On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:06:49AM -0500, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de was heard
to say:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:55:11PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:55:11PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using
eth0 or /dev/eth0 before, so I didn't check if such a file
existed. A network
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:55:11PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using
eth0 or /dev/eth0 before, so I didn't check if such a file
existed. A network interface is a device which I expect to be
represented under /dev.
Not
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:55:11PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using
eth0 or /dev/eth0 before, so I didn't check if such a file
existed. A network
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:55:11PM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using
eth0 or /dev/eth0 before, so I didn't check if such a file
existed. A network interface is a device which I expect to be
represented under /dev.
Not so, at
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
James Youngman wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:40:00PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090529225111.gf1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee
In 20090603155614.gv1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
It always turned eth0 into eth1 for me, extremely annoying.
This is a result of an attempt to make interface names persistent by tying
them to MAC addresses. It falls on its face often. There really needs to
be some sort of
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:40:00PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090529225111.gf1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
Anyway, I'd like to know what happened
to /dev/eth0.
I've never had a Linux box where
James Youngman wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:40:00PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090529225111.gf1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
Anyway, I'd like to know what happened
to /dev/eth0.
In 20090601003859.gq1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:12:09PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In the rare case that I needed to specify an interface name, I used the
raw kernel name (e.g. eth0) and not a pathname. Usually, I've only done
this for lo,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:12:09PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using
eth0 or /dev/eth0 before.
In the rare case that I needed to specify an interface name, I used the raw
kernel name (e.g. eth0) and not a pathname.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:40:00PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090529225111.gf1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
Anyway, I'd like to know what happened
to /dev/eth0.
I've never had a Linux box where /dev/eth0 existed. That said, I'm only been
using it as my main OS
In 20090530163014.gh1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:40:00PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090529225111.gf1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
Anyway, I'd like to know what happened
to /dev/eth0.
I've never had a Linux box where
On Fri,29.May.09, 00:35:38, lee wrote:
Hi,
what happened to network devices like /dev/eth0?
cat:~# dhcp_probe -f /dev/eth0
note: starting, version 1.3.0
error: dhcp_probe: bad interface '/dev/eth0': SIOCGIFADDR: /dev/eth0: No
such device
note: exiting
Hhhm, I never needed to put
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:35:47PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri,29.May.09, 00:35:38, lee wrote:
Hi,
what happened to network devices like /dev/eth0?
cat:~# dhcp_probe -f /dev/eth0
note: starting, version 1.3.0
error: dhcp_probe: bad interface '/dev/eth0': SIOCGIFADDR
In 20090529225111.gf1...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com, lee wrote:
Anyway, I'd like to know what happened
to /dev/eth0.
I've never had a Linux box where /dev/eth0 existed. That said, I'm only been
using it as my main OS since the end of 2004.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-.
Hi,
what happened to network devices like /dev/eth0?
cat:~# dhcp_probe -f /dev/eth0
note: starting, version 1.3.0
error: dhcp_probe: bad interface '/dev/eth0': SIOCGIFADDR: /dev/eth0: No such
device
note: exiting
cat:~# find / -name eth0
/proc/irq/20/eth0
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/eth0
17 matches
Mail list logo
