On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:21:27 +0200, go...@dobosevic.com in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
So, I think the best solution is to ask developers to upload
swfdec-mozilla to debian-volatile and to support it there too.
What do you guys think?
I'm think you are right. This days most of end
Aniruddha mailingdotl...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can tell there are four possibilities to achieve this:
1) Temporary enable testing/unstable
So, I think the best solution is to ask developers to upload
swfdec-mozilla to debian-volatile and to support it there too.
What do you guys think?
I'm think you are right. This days most of end user's can't live without
this things (messenger, flash etc.)and they very often change.
--
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:50:27AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon,18.May.09, 16:28:55, Barclay, Daniel wrote:
Michael M. Moore wrote:
...
mcu...@drifter:~$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Default-Release stable;
APT::Cache-Limit 33554432;
At some time in the past,
On Sat,23.May.09, 19:59:31, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Has that been fixed yet?
Short answer: No. Long answer: see #97564, #254716, #423234 and #509471.
If not, how can one avoid having aptitude try to upgrade you to a newly
release version (before you more directly choose to)?
I'd
On Mon,18.May.09, 16:28:55, Barclay, Daniel wrote:
Michael M. Moore wrote:
...
mcu...@drifter:~$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Default-Release stable;
APT::Cache-Limit 33554432;
At some time in the past, APT::Default-Release worked only with the
status-based
release names (stable,
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:23 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
Do you happen to know where I can' find more info about this
process?
There'll be a large chapter on this in my forthcoming book. Until
then, I suggest you check out the stuff I wrote about pbuilder in
the current
also sprach Aniruddha mailingdotl...@gmail.com [2009.05.20.0852 +0200]:
Looking forward to the release of your book :) What about rebuilding
packages with apt-get source / dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b? Is
this also possible (instead of building a Debian package from
scratch)?
If you do
On Sun,17.May.09, 14:06:47, Michael M. Moore wrote:
I use a pretty conservative pinning, more conservative than what is
given on the wiki. Mine is taken from Martin Krafft's book The Debian
System, recently recommended on this list:
mcu...@drifter:~$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
also sprach Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com [2009.05.18.0847 +0200]:
The Default-Release option in apt.conf will set stable's
priority to 990, why are you changing it again to 900?
Two stitches are better than one? ;)
In general, I'd say to prefer /etc/apt/preferences over apt.conf,
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:57 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
By the way, even though one can mix testing and unstable, I suggest
to avoid that. http://backports.org contains packages backported
from testing and compiled for the stable distribution, which
integrate better with
also sprach Aniruddha mailingdotl...@gmail.com [2009.05.18.0954 +0200]:
Thanks for the answer. And what about downloading an occasional
package from packages.debian.org? (like the latest swfdec) is this
more preferable then apt-pinning?
This is more or less identical to pinning, except you are
Michael M. Moore wrote:
...
mcu...@drifter:~$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Default-Release stable;
APT::Cache-Limit 33554432;
At some time in the past, APT::Default-Release worked only with the status-based
release names (stable, testing, etc.) but didn't work (and didn't report any
error
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can tell there are four possibilities to achieve this:
1) Temporary enable testing/unstable repositories and install the program
2) Download *.deb from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/17/09 09:40, Aniruddha wrote:
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can tell there are four possibilities to achieve this:
1)
Harry Rickards wrote:
On 05/17/09 09:40, Aniruddha wrote:
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can tell there are four possibilities to achieve this:
1) Temporary enable
Aniruddha wrote:
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can tell there are four possibilities to achieve this:
1) Temporary enable testing/unstable repositories and install the
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:38 PM, JoeHill joeh...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Aniruddha wrote:
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can tell there are four possibilities to achieve this:
1)
Aniruddha wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:38 PM, JoeHill joeh...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Aniruddha wrote:
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can tell there are four
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 21:50 +0200, Aniruddha wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:38 PM, JoeHill joeh...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Aniruddha wrote:
I would like to install the latest version swfdec-mozilla (because it
offers autoplay). I intent to track stable as closely as possible. As
far I can
20 matches
Mail list logo
