Hi DC,
Am 2008-06-22 21:31:41, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
Yes, they require the opening of an account to write to them. I
suppose that it is similar in that many FOSS mailing lists one must
subscribe to post: they are weeding out the spammers. End to end it
took me about five minutes to open the
2008/6/24 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Solidworks =2005 runs in codeweavers, but nothing in wine.
Which version? Anything below 1.0.0 underwent (and will in the future
under the 1.1 tree) development at a significant rate of change.
Frequently, prior to 1.0, things that didn't work one
2008/6/24 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 23/06/2008, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) I must be interoperable with the other engineers running Solidworks.
Your definition of interoperable seems a little weird. It sounds too
much like the definition of vendor lock-in.
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 21:31 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
If anyone has any proprietary Windows apps that they'd like to see
ported to Linux, then mention them and I will write to the developers
as well.
Wouldn't it be a better thing in the long term to encourage vendors to
take a far more
2008/6/24 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 21:31 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
If anyone has any proprietary Windows apps that they'd like to see
ported to Linux, then mention them and I will write to the developers
as well.
Wouldn't it be a better thing in the long term to
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 01:03 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/6/24 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 21:31 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
If anyone has any proprietary Windows apps that they'd like to see
ported to Linux, then mention them and I will write to the developers
as
2008/6/24 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it possible to wine your way out of this one? Forgive me if this has
already been brought up; I appear to only have the thread after the
subject change.
Solidworks =2005 runs in codeweavers, but nothing in wine. I need a
later version anyway. I
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 01:24 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/6/24 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it possible to wine your way out of this one? Forgive me if this has
already been brought up; I appear to only have the thread after the
subject change.
Solidworks =2005 runs in
On 23/06/2008, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) I must be interoperable with the other engineers running Solidworks.
Your definition of interoperable seems a little weird. It sounds too
much like the definition of vendor lock-in.
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
2008/6/22 Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008 Jun 21 10:05 -0500]:
When someone develops and maintains a FOSS solution that runs on Linux
that lets me interoperate with my Solidworks-using colleagues
flawlessly I will happily donate to the project twice what
* Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008 Jun 22 01:45 -0500]:
2008/6/22 Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008 Jun 21 10:05 -0500]:
When someone develops and maintains a FOSS solution that runs on Linux
that lets me interoperate with my Solidworks-using
2008/6/22 Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Proprietary binary formats.
Which makes your whole proposition very dicey. As a practical matter,
trying to implement not publicly documented formats leads to a chasing
of the taillights scenario where every time the FOSS developers get
close to
Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/6/22 Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Proprietary binary formats.
Which makes your whole proposition very dicey. As a practical matter,
trying to implement not publicly documented formats leads to a chasing
of the taillights scenario where every time the FOSS
2008/6/22 Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Writing to them at the address you provided means creating an account.
I think they already have made up their minds insofar as price/benefits of a
Linux port.
Yes, they require the opening of an account to write to them. I
suppose that it is
2008/6/21 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 21/06/2008, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally would be satisfied paying thousands of dollars for
Solidworks and not having access to the source code so long as it runs
on my OS.
I think this is rather nearsighted.
* Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008 Jun 21 10:05 -0500]:
When someone develops and maintains a FOSS solution that runs on Linux
that lets me interoperate with my Solidworks-using colleagues
flawlessly I will happily donate to the project twice what I would be
paying to Solid. That's a lot
16 matches
Mail list logo
