Hi Greg
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 2:43 AM
> From: "Greg Wooledge"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: From which kernel should I upgrade my installed Debian to
> linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64?
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 07:38:02PM +0100, St
On 11 Dec 2023 21:45 -0700, from charlescur...@charlescurley.com (Charles
Curley):
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057967
And from the looks of that bug report thread, message #72 onwards,
there is now a candidate fix.
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 04:15:33 +
Tom Furie wrote:
> Do we know yet which wifi drivers are "troublesome"? I haven't seen
> anything concrete yet anywhere.
You can read the gory details at Mr. Price's bug report.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057967
--
Does anybody read
Kevin Price writes:
> 6.1.0-15 brought not only the ext4-bugfix, but along with it introduced
> a terrible new bug: Most computers work fine with -15, except for some
> of those that have wifi, depending upon the driver. There was a certain
> change in Linux's cfg80211 kernel module, which
Hey Stella, hey all:
Am 11.12.23 um 19:38 schrieb Stella Ashburne:
> Thank goodness it only happens once in a blue moon.
May I please clarify some basic (mis-)conceptions?
There's "linux-image-amd64". This is a metapackage that contains nothing
but a constructed dependency upon the latest
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 07:38:02PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Please see Greg's reply to my other post (URL:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/12/msg00640.html).
>
> For your convenience, I quote a section of his reply (see below):
>
> "Yes, because linux-image-amd64 *right now*
Hi Andy
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 11:25 PM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: From which kernel should I upgrade my installed Debian to
> linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64?
>
>
> If you're not currently booted i
evice into
> > (1) linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (the problematic kernel)
>
> NO. Don't ever boot that as it might then toast your ext4.
>
> > (2) linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 (which precedes the buggy one)
>
> Yes.
>
> > (3) doesn't matter which kernel to
ever boot that as it might then toast your ext4.
> (2) linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 (which precedes the buggy one)
Yes.
> (3) doesn't matter which kernel to upgrade from
Yes, it largely doesn't matter, apart from the exception above.
HTH
--
Kevin Price
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:16:39PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> (3) doesn't matter which kernel to upgrade from
That.
)
However..
Suppose I wish to upgrade to linux-image-6.1.0-15-amd64.
Should I do it after booting my device into
(1) linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (the problematic kernel)
or
(2) linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 (which precedes the buggy one)
or
(3) doesn't matter which kernel to upgrade from
I
Stephen P. Molnar, on 2018-10-08:
> I'm confused a normal state for me, one of increasing mental
> entropy)?
Let's exchange some, then...
> I decided to try Buster in VirtualBox on my Stretch AMD
> platform and downloaded the dvd1. The installer installed the
> 4.16.0 kernel, but no header
I'm confused a normal state for me, one of increasing mental entropy)?
I decided to try Buster in VirtualBox on my Stretch AMD platform and
downloaded the dvd1. The installer installed the 4.16.0 kernel, but no
header fiels for that kernel, but rather the header files for the 4.18.0
Dennis Wicks wrote on 09/27/2018 06:40 PM:
> I notice that there is available two different kernels;
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-686-pae
>
> and
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-rt-686-pae
>
> I am running on a Pentium 4.
>
> Which one of these should I be using? And just for
> curiosities
On Thursday 27 September 2018 19:40:59 Dennis Wicks wrote:
> I notice that there is available two different kernels;
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-686-pae
>
> and
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-rt-686-pae
>
> I am running on a Pentium 4.
>
> Which one of these should I be using? And just for
>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 06:40:59PM -0500, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> I notice that there is available two different kernels;
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-686-pae
>
> and
>
> linux-image-4.9.0-8-rt-686-pae
>
> I am running on a Pentium 4.
>
> Which one of these should I be using? And just
I notice that there is available two different kernels;
linux-image-4.9.0-8-686-pae
and
linux-image-4.9.0-8-rt-686-pae
I am running on a Pentium 4.
Which one of these should I be using? And just for
curiosities sake, why?
TIA!
Dennis
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 07:44:17AM -0800, ray wrote:
> I am installing Debian 9.3 non-free on anamd64 machine. During installation
> of the base system, it asks to choose a kernel
> Linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64
> Linux-image-amd64
> What is the difference of these?
>
You probably want
I am installing Debian 9.3 non-free on anamd64 machine. During installation of
the base system, it asks to choose a kernel
Linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64
Linux-image-amd64
What is the difference of these?
Yes. Two of the above.
You are running Debian kernel 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3 which is compatible
with the kernel ABI used in Debian kernel *package* 3.16.0-4-686-pae.
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5195 confirms
that you want 3.16.36-1+deb8u2.
Thank you for your quick
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:18:03PM +0100, Georg Stillfried wrote:
> can someone please help me find out which kernel version (and
> sub-version) I have?
uname -a
> $ uname -v
> #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3 (2016-07-02)
>
> $ uname -r
> 3.16.0-4-686-pae
Or that. I
Hello,
can someone please help me find out which kernel version (and
sub-version) I have? Don't scould, I have done the search on Google and
in the Debian documentation on how to find one's kernel version, but I
am confused by the results:
$ uname -v
#1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3
emachines, which kernel module for lan card?
Si quelqu'un a un module compilé pour un
noyau/kernel 2.6.26-1-686
pour la carte Ethernet :
01:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. Device 002b (rev 01)
ou :
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Attansic Technology Corp. Device 1062 (rev
I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
Ionreflex wrote:
[quote]
Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
[/quote]
What does `lol' mean here? Is it some version of something, or did you
simply put this over there because you have some sense of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merciadri Luca wrote:
Ionreflex wrote:
[quote]
Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
[/quote]
What does `lol' mean here?
I guess it's just the hostname of the computer in question.
- --
Johannes
In questions
Merciadri Luca wrote:
I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
NB: Apparently, the original post you replied to was to debian-laptop,
not debian-user...
--
Johannes
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the
humble reasoning of a single individual.
-
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:04 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
I have no answer to your question, but I am wondering...
Ionreflex wrote:
[quote]
Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
[/quote]
What does `lol' mean here? Is it some version of something, or
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Merciadri Luca wrote:
Ionreflex wrote:
[quote]
Linux lol 2.4.27-3-586tsc #1 Tue Dec 5 22:06:26 UTC 2006 i586 GNU/Linux
[/quote]
What does `lol' mean here?
I guess it's just the hostname of the computer in question.
Special, but funny. Must be some
Wolodja Wentland wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:04 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
A very unique and inventive hostname - if that is the output of 'uname
-a'
That is, objectively, the reason why one tries to find an unique
hostname, but we will all agree on the special character of
Recently the 2.6.32-3-686 kernel was posted to testing. When it was
added to the grub menu it was put *after* the 2.6.32-trunk-686 kernel.
Which is the newer kernel? If 2.6.32-3 is newer why was it placed in
second position?
--
All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote:
Recently the 2.6.32-3-686 kernel was posted to testing. When it was
added to the grub menu it was put *after* the 2.6.32-trunk-686 kernel.
Which is the newer kernel? If 2.6.32-3 is newer why was it placed in
second position?
On 29 Jan., 07:50, Paul Csanyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
[..]
Which kernel module is for the usb-ethernet adapter:
usbnet, or other?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Regards, Paul Csanyihttp://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
Hello
usbnet is just the framework for usb
Hello!
I shall buy an usb-ethernet adapter for my laptop.
Will works any usb-ethernet adapter with Debian Etch
system?
Which kernel module is for the usb-ethernet adapter:
usbnet, or other?
Any advices will be appreciated!
--
Regards, Paul Csanyi
http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:45:40AM +0100, Paul Csanyi wrote:
Hello!
I shall buy an usb-ethernet adapter for my laptop.
Will works any usb-ethernet adapter with Debian Etch
system?
Which kernel module is for the usb-ethernet adapter:
Chances are that the evice will load automatically
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:28:48AM +0800, Kun Niu wrote:
Thank you for tracing my problem.
It's true that my root system is of ext3 format.
I only got the compiled image from the mirror site security.debian.org.
I don't know if ext3 is compiled is built into the kernel or compiled
as a
is 2.4.27 on 386 system.
I've ever tried 2.6.8 smp kernel but the system fails to boot.
I wonder if the cpu is supported by etch and which kernel I should
choose to use if it is supported.
Thanks for any help in advance.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
to boot.
I wonder if the cpu is supported by etch and which kernel I should
choose to use if it is supported.
Thanks for any help in advance.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.6.8 smp kernel but the system fails to boot.
I wonder if the cpu is supported by etch and which kernel I should
choose to use if it is supported.
Thanks for any help in advance.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
on 386 system.
I've ever tried 2.6.8 smp kernel but the system fails to boot.
I wonder if the cpu is supported by etch and which kernel I should
choose to use if it is supported.
Thanks for any help in advance.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
is supported by etch and which kernel I should
choose to use if it is supported.
Thanks for any help in advance.
Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
I would like to run 32 bit Debian Testing/Larry on my AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
Dual Core Processor 4400+ CPU.
Which kernel should I choose? I switched from the default 2.6.18-4-486
to 2.6.18-4-amd64 but I am having trouble compiling an Nvidia module. I get:
ld: Relocatable linking
On 5/25/07, Chaim Keren Tzion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run 32 bit Debian Testing/Larry on my AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
Dual Core Processor 4400+ CPU.
Which kernel should I choose? I switched from the default 2.6.18-4-486
to 2.6.18-4-amd64 but I am having trouble compiling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/07 20:12, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On 5/25/07, Chaim Keren Tzion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run 32 bit Debian Testing/Larry on my AMD Athlon(tm)
64 X2
Dual Core Processor 4400+ CPU.
Which kernel should I choose? I
Just trying to do an expert non-gui install of Etch. During base system
installation, it asks which kernel to install:
linux-image-2.6.18-4-486
linux-image-2.6-486
none (yeah, right. Here I just pull one out of my . . . sleeve.)
So how can I tell which one to install? The screen defaults
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:05PM -0500, Default User wrote:
Just trying to do an expert non-gui install of Etch. During base system
installation, it asks which kernel to install:
linux-image-2.6.18-4-486
this is a specific kernel version and refers to a package which
actually contains
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:53:51 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:05PM -0500, Default User wrote:
Just trying to do an expert non-gui install of Etch. During base system
installation, it asks which kernel to install:
[snip]
none (yeah
, it asks which kernel to install:
[snip]
none (yeah, right. Here I just pull one out of my . . . sleeve.)
roll your own, of course :)
A
On an install?
okay, I've never done it (adds it to list of things to do before
dying), but you should be able to switch to a VT, chroot
lack highmem support, and
suspect this is the cause of my problem. I guess I need to install a new
kernel? uname -a reports the following:
Linux artoo 2.6.15-1-486 #2 Mon Mar 6 15:19:16 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
I have been searching packages.debian.org, but am not sure which kernel
would
that some kernels lack highmem support, and
suspect this is the cause of my problem. I guess I need to install a new
kernel? uname -a reports the following:
Linux artoo 2.6.15-1-486 #2 Mon Mar 6 15:19:16 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
I have been searching packages.debian.org, but am not sure which
6 15:19:16 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
I have been searching packages.debian.org, but am not sure which
kernel would be the most suitable. I have an AMD64 processor, but I
chose to use the regular i386 port because the amd64 port is
unofficial.
Could anyone suggest which would be the most
Hi,
I have tried to install the Nvidia video drivers on
the current stable release (Sarge). But it needs
kernel sources installed. I have installed the
2.6.8.2-686 kernel (as offered by the standard
DVD install program of Sarge).
I don't know which kernel sources (or kernel
headers?) I have
of Sarge).
I don't know which kernel sources (or kernel
headers?) I have to install. Another problem
is, that I have currently no Internet access
from Debian (will change soon) and have only
the first DVD (AFAIK there are 2). I don't
found a kernel-headers-2.6.8.2-686 package,
only a kernel
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by:
$ COLUMNS=160 dpkg -l
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 11:47 -0500, H. S. wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select
H. S. wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by:
$
H. S. wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by:
$
Hello
Oliver Fuchs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
at the moment I am running a 2.2.20 kernel (compiled by myself) on my
debian woody box. For the upcoming next version (sarge) I'd like to
know if I have to upgrade my kernel to another version (2.4 or even
2.6) and what version exactly is
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Hello
Oliver Fuchs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
at the moment I am running a 2.2.20 kernel (compiled by myself) on my
debian woody box. For the upcoming next version (sarge) I'd like to
know if I have to upgrade my kernel to another version
Hi,
at the moment I am running a 2.2.20 kernel (compiled by myself) on my debian
woody box. For the upcoming next version (sarge) I'd like to know if I have
to upgrade my kernel to another version (2.4 or even 2.6) and what version
exactly is recommended (for example in the 2.4 version line)?
Hi
I have installed Debian-3.0r2-i386, I have installed ax25-tools,
ax25-apps, libax25 packages. And turn around and installed
ax25-config-03.3 package. Now i have been told that I need to compile
the kernel for Packet radio work right. I have been googlen and reading
how to compile the
Johnny wrote:
Hi
I have installed Debian-3.0r2-i386, I have installed ax25-tools,
ax25-apps, libax25 packages. And turn around and installed
ax25-config-03.3 package. Now i have been told that I need to compile
the kernel for Packet radio work right. I have been googlen and
reading how to
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 20:21, Johnny wrote:
Hi
I have installed Debian-3.0r2-i386, I have installed ax25-tools,
ax25-apps, libax25 packages. And turn around and installed
ax25-config-03.3 package. Now i have been told that I need to compile
the kernel for Packet radio work right. I have
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:56:07PM -0500, matt zagrabelny wrote:
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 20:21, Johnny wrote:
Hi
I have installed Debian-3.0r2-i386, I have installed ax25-tools,
ax25-apps, libax25 packages. And turn around and installed
ax25-config-03.3 package. Now i have been told that
I'm using kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686-smp for such a machine
(incl. an init RD for raid1 and reiserfs). But how can I
enable HT there? [Note: I need a Debian stock kernel, not
a home-grown, for this machine.]
I would check the BIOS to see if there is a setting to turn on
hyper-threading.
Hi,
I'm using kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686-smp for such a machine
(incl. an init RD for raid1 and reiserfs). But how can I
enable HT there? [Note: I need a Debian stock kernel, not
a home-grown, for this machine.]
Cheers, WB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 24 October 2003 09:32 am, W. Borgert wrote:
Hi,
I'm using kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686-smp for such a machine
(incl. an init RD for raid1 and reiserfs). But how can I
enable HT there? [Note: I need a Debian stock kernel, not
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej,
I have now a number of times tried to upgrade my kernel from Woodys
stable default 2.2.20 (installed from boot floppies), to a 2.4 version.
I have tried with kernel-image-2.4.18-386
(kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-386) as well as
Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 07:50:58AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:55, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 07:50:58AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:55, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel
Hello
WARNING : don't follow thread, perhaps out of subject.
briefly, I've got same chipset, excepted a spurious message at boot, have
no problems, 48Mo/s with DMA on ata5 'if remember fine) on HD and good rate
on (RW-)CD's.
Running 2.4.20 but 2.4.18 fine (customs kernel)
Hop'it'elp
David
Pigeon wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:53:54PM -0700, Al Davis wrote:
I have since installed Debian, with 2.4.20-bf2.4, and now I
wonder if it is safe to re-enable DMA.
I have a VIA 82C686 southbridge, and 2.4.20 enables its VIA
southbridge workaround when it boots. So presumably the
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 22:55, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel image from Unstable. Which image do I
need for this chip, or will
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:53:54PM -0700, Al Davis wrote:
I was getting disk corruption with an older kernel (2.4.8 or
2.4.18, Mandrake). A colleague said it might have something
to do with a hardware bug (south bridge VIA VT82C686). He also
said there was a fix in recent kernels. I
Pigeon said:
I think there are a lot of VIA chipsets out there but most people
don't have problems; presumably some other factor is needed to make the
bug show up. Wonder what?
not entirely related but thought to mention ..
about a year and a half ago I was looking for a MB to get an Athlon
A bit off topic here.. sorry
Others ahve expressed problems with Asus based on memory issues. Anyone
have any thoughts?
The recent comment was on the A7V8X being very picky with RAM. My
friend picked up a different KT400 based system and popped in the same
PC2700 (not PC3200) that didnt work
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel image from Unstable. Which image do I
need for this chip, or will I have to roll my own?
Thanks!
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel image from Unstable. Which image do I
need for this chip, or will I have to roll my own?
The Via C3 series, of which the Ezra is part of, is
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:50, Kent West wrote:
Got a Walmart Microtel $300 computer with a Via Ezra microprocessor. I
want to upgrade to a 2.4.20 kernel image from Unstable. Which image do I
need for this chip, or will I have to roll my own?
The Via C3 series, of
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for my IDE
disks.
I get mesages like:
hdc: timeout waiting for DMA
ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func. only: 14
hdc: status error: status=0x58 {
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
my IDE disks.
On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
If you have a VIA chipset try making sure that VIA chipset
support is included in the kernel.
How
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 13:42, Al Davis wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
my IDE disks.
On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
If you have a VIA chipset try making sure that
Al Davis wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
my IDE disks.
On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
If you have a VIA chipset try making sure that VIA chipset
support is included in
Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
my IDE disks.
On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
If you have a VIA chipset try making
Ron Johnson wrote:
Well, 1st, do you know which chipset the A7V266-D runs?
Btw, the ASUS web site only mentions the A7V266-C.
http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7v266-c/overview.htm
Try this url for the dual model. (D is for dual.)
http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7m266-d/overview.htm
Bob
Wayne Topa wrote:
Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
How do I find out?
I am using the one on the woody bf2.4 cd.
lspci will show if you have VIA and
grep VIA /usr/src/linux/.config will show if you have enabled it.
If you are using the bf24 kernel then the config is
On Sunday 19 January 2003 02:48 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
Wayne Topa wrote:
Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
How do I find out?
If you are using the bf24 kernel then the config is installed
in /boot.
grep VIA /boot/config-2.4.18-bf2.4
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 03:10:23PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 13:42, Al Davis wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
my IDE disks.
On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:43, Bob Proulx wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Well, 1st, do you know which chipset the A7V266-D runs?
Btw, the ASUS web site only mentions the A7V266-C.
http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7v266-c/overview.htm
Try this url for the dual model. (D is for dual.)
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:48, Bob Proulx wrote:
Wayne Topa wrote:
Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
How do I find out?
I am using the one on the woody bf2.4 cd.
lspci will show if you have VIA and
grep VIA /usr/src/linux/.config will show if you have enabled
Pigeon wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for my IDE
disks.
...
If you have a VIA chipset try making sure that VIA chipset support is
included in the kernel.
No, it's an Asus A7M266-D, which has
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:48, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
...
But the A7M266-D doesn't use a Via chipset.
From http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7m266-d/overview.htm :
The A7M266-D leverages the technology of the AMD 760MPX chipset
A quick google, and the *first* URL shown on
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for my IDE
disks.
I get mesages like:
hdc: timeout waiting for DMA
ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func. only: 14
hdc: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady, SeekComplete, DataRequest }
hdc: drive not ready for
devices?
- If yes, may I know which kernel parameter to alter?
- Also, may I know how much the limit is?
thank you.
--
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim -- vLSM.org -- http://rms46.vLSM.org --
=== Debian Does Dallas: http://wmbr.mit.edu/shows/ddd/ =
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello!
Instead of mirroring the bulky DEBIAN pool, I have a plan to do
the same thing for the woody images. Unfortunately, there are only
eight /dev/loop devices.
Questions:
- Is there any way to add more loop devices?
- If yes, may I know which kernel parameter to alter?
Yes
, there are only
eight /dev/loop devices.
Questions:
- Is there any way to add more loop devices?
- If yes, may I know which kernel parameter to alter?
- Also, may I know how much the limit is?
thank you.
--
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim -- vLSM.org -- http://rms46.vLSM.org --
=== Debian Does Dallas
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:18:39PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:10:32 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
There are those who think that 2.2 is more stable
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
...
Please correct me if I have misunderstood. It was my impression that
the odd numbered kernel sub-versions eg., 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 are/were
testing/unstable. When they are ready for prime time, they are
promoted. Thus 2.1 became 2.2, 2.3 became
Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
thnx Tim
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
There are those who think that 2.2 is more stable than 2.4 in
production server environments.
Being a home user, I haven't had any problems with 2.4, starting
with 2.4.3, up
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:10:32 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
There are those who think that 2.2 is more stable than 2.4 in
production server environments.
Being a home user, I
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
