Dietrich Bollmann wrote:
I would like to install Debian on my IBM X60s laptop.
The processor is an Intel Core Duo T2300.
Which release has better chances to work, sarge or etch?
As suggested elsewhere, I would start with sarge and then upgrade to
etch, if need arises.
Also check out www.thinkw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 02:23:28AM +0900, Dietrich Bollmann wrote:
> Albert Dengg wrote:
> >though if you can spend the bandwith to try i would probably reocmmend
> >to try to start with a standard sarge netinst cd
> >(if you want to have the newer
Albert Dengg wrote:
though if you can spend the bandwith to try i would probably reocmmend
to try to start with a standard sarge netinst cd
(if you want to have the newer apps later on, you can easily upgrade,
but not downgrade).
Ok, so I will start with a sarge netinst.
By the way, is it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Dietrich Bollmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to install Debian on my IBM X60s laptop.
> The processor is an Intel Core Duo T2300.
> Which release has better chances to work, sarge or etch?
>
It depends...
Hi,
I would like to install Debian on my IBM X60s laptop.
The processor is an Intel Core Duo T2300.
Which release has better chances to work, sarge or etch?
Thanks for your help, Dietrich
Motivation:
I already tried to install DeMuDi ( http://demudi.org/ ) as I am
interested in a low-latency ke
5 matches
Mail list logo
