>> > options snd_hda_intel id=[HDMI,PCH] index=1,0
>> Might be you need to write with dashes, as the module files is named
>> with dashes.
> Thank you for the reply. However, dashes and underscores can be
> interchanged in these files.
FWIW: That's been my experience for the `modprobe` command arg
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 10:00:20AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> Have you read log messages reported by journalctl? There is a systemd unit
> to load modules, but I expect that this one should be autoloaded in response
> to an udev event.
Yes, I did try to find anything relevant using journalctl.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:52:26PM +0200, Franco Martelli wrote:
> > I am running debian testing, updated daily.
> I'm on stable, so I can't help much
>
> >
> > After yesterday's update, the kernel module snd_hda_intel is being
> > loaded with the wrong (default) parameters.
> Have you verified t
On 03/09/2024 22:51, ael wrote:
I have /etc/modprobe.d/snd-hda.conf
which specifies:
options snd_hda_intel id=[HDMI,PCH] index=1,0
[...]
Maybe there are some release notes that I have failed to read? Can
anyone point me in the right direction? (If the direction is Devuan,
I have already moved
Hi,
On 03/09/24 at 17:51, ael wrote:
Hello,
I am running debian testing, updated daily.
I'm on stable, so I can't help much
After yesterday's update, the kernel module snd_hda_intel is being
loaded with the wrong (default) parameters.
Have you verified this by running the following command
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 04:51:02PM +0100, ael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running debian testing, updated daily.
>
> After yesterday's update, the kernel module snd_hda_intel is being
> loaded with the wrong (default) parameters.
>
> I have /etc/modprobe.d/snd-hda.conf
> which specifies:
> options
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 08:33:54PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> ael (12024-09-03):
> > options snd_hda_intel id=[HDMI,PCH] index=1,0
>
> Might be you need to write with dashes, as the module files is named
> with dashes.
Thank you for the reply. However, dashes and underscores can be
interchang
ael (12024-09-03):
> options snd_hda_intel id=[HDMI,PCH] index=1,0
Might be you need to write with dashes, as the module files is named
with dashes.
Might be brackets are not the correct syntax for an array option.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Hello,
I am running debian testing, updated daily.
After yesterday's update, the kernel module snd_hda_intel is being
loaded with the wrong (default) parameters.
I have /etc/modprobe.d/snd-hda.conf
which specifies:
options snd_hda_intel id=[HDMI,PCH] index=1,0
The details are very unlikely to b
> I'm running Debian/Trixie on an AMD64 system, using the Plasma 5 over X
> desktop. Firefox 115.12.0esr is crashing multiple times per day. It
> frequently happens when page I'm transfers to another page that creates
> a PDF or just has a complicated link. It's annoying.
>
> To visit some pages, I
On 2024-08-17 22:47, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 9:07 PM Gary Dale wrote:
[...]
Out of frustration with this and another problem, I did a complete fresh
install yesterday - first to Bookworm then a full-upgrade to Trixie. I
started with a new profile for Firefox then synced it
Aug 18, 2024, 01:07 by g...@extremeground.com:
> Firefox ESR is still crashing intermittently. Again, I can trigger it fairly
> consistently just by visiting some pages (usually ones that try to generate a
> PDF, for example). At other times it just crashes for no apparent reason.
>
You're usi
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 9:07 PM Gary Dale wrote:
> [...]
> Out of frustration with this and another problem, I did a complete fresh
> install yesterday - first to Bookworm then a full-upgrade to Trixie. I
> started with a new profile for Firefox then synced it to restore my
> passwords and bookmar
On 2024-07-19 11:19, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-19 11:09, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-19 10:42, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2024-07-19 at 10:34, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-18 09:52, Gary Dale wrote:
Thanks for the tips guys, but I'm not going to switch to XFCE, I'm
using an old AMD graphics car
Children are taught in elementary school that computer == Windows.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:44:37AM +0800, hlyg wrote:
[...]
> PS: i am aware that linux has more success in server market
... and the mobile market. Android is, on its underbelly, Linux
after all. So Linux might have the most installations out there,
I guess.
Not that Microsoft didn't try -- th
i realize i have asked hard question: why free OS hasn't beaten M$ in
past 30 years? there's no easy answer, it requires years of experience
in Windows and Linux
1st, programmers from proprietary software company are as clever as best
from open source community. perhaps they
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 07:55:29PM -0600, Shawn Jefferds wrote:
Your final statement makes me curious about learning Dvorak.
Shawn Jefferds
??n ??f?rdz
Noli fovere canem ardentum
Vote Vader 2024!
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 11:37 Russell L. Harris wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:48:19PM +080
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 10:03 AM Joe wrote:
>
>
> Basically, I think that with many more users, we would see more Windows
> users and they would be less secure in their habits. We've already seen
> this to some extent with Ubuntu. I don't think it's any more difficult
> to write a virus for Li
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 04:48:19PM +0800, hlyg wrote:
On 7/21/24 02:33, Russell L. Harris wrote:
The same reasons the standard typewriter keyboard is QWERTY rather
than Dvorak:
= The precedent set by the first to market is powerful.
= The influence of advertising upon a populace lacking in di
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 12:19 PM Hans wrote:
>
> I do not agree to this. Updates should be installed as soon as they are
> available. Especially security updates. It shows , that within 24 hours after
> the release of an update, an exploit is available for this security hole.
I think you may be c
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > - software updates that run as root (including Debian updates)
> > can run anything else as root
>
> So, maybe a more relevant discussion is: what will happen when a Debian
> stable security update comes with a "big blunder" that crashes the most
> machines in earl
hlyg writes:
> why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of development?
But it has. The internet and what connects to it now mostly run Linux,
other than Microsoft's single niche. Mobile phones run a Linux
variant. The PC desktop is the only exception where they ha
t;> organization deciding which of the most recent three versions each
>> of their computers will get) but just with a data-files update
>> (which, as we have seen here, appears to go out to all clients
>> regardless of version).
>
> At minimum, it is negligence.
Agreed.
I do not agree to this. Updates should be installed as soon as they are
available. Especially security updates. It shows , that within 24 hours after
the release of an update, an exploit is available for this security hole.
But you should do it corrdectly, like some hospitals did: First check wi
gt;>
>> Their is essentially no one in the linux arena to sue if things go
>> south, so it doesn't take more than an eighth grade education to
>> see why they won't ever recommend linux no matter how superior it
>> may be at the end of a P&L report. They hav
Dan Ritter writes:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Jeffrey Walton writes:
>>
>> Yes the updates should be tested at every stage. Maybe people think that
>> they cannot stop updates, but they can use Group Policy to stop Windows
>> Update. Or maybe they are afraid if they don't allow virus updates then
>>
Joe (12024-07-21):
> And the important phrase there is 'if you want to'. The point is that
> many people, especially those accustomed to running with admin
> privileges on their Windows computers, would continue to do that.
No, they will not. They will continue to follow the system
default, whate
Alain D D Williams (12024-07-21):
> I only needed root as it was for another user.
Exactly. On a computer with only one user account, once the pirate have
access to that account, they can do everything that matters. Including
spy the root password next time it is typed, but why waste the t
gle
(but not keystrokes I think), MS Edge does likewise - which is why I stick to
Firefox.
But if you have root access it is easy, I did it on a Unix system V machine in
the late 1980s, a few minutes work. I only needed root as it was for another
user.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail
Joe (12024-07-21):
> I accept what you say, the point I was making is that the more users,
> and they will be less IT-competent users, the more will login as root.
No, they will not.
And it does not matter, because on a personal computer the root account
is not what matters, what matters is the u
d it takes a bit
of fiddling to set up an unprivileged user and *always* *use* *it*.
It's inconvenient to keep entering the admin password (there's still no
sudo, as far as I know), so people prefer to run with admin privileges.
In most cases, nobody has ever told them why they shouldn
> - software updates that run as root (including Debian updates)
> can run anything else as root
So, maybe a more relevant discussion is: what will happen when a Debian
stable security update comes with a "big blunder" that crashes the most
machines in early boot?
Admittedly, the wider vari
Richmond wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton writes:
>
> Yes the updates should be tested at every stage. Maybe people think that
> they cannot stop updates, but they can use Group Policy to stop Windows
> Update. Or maybe they are afraid if they don't allow virus updates then
> they will allow a virus?
Th
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> This is alarming (to me) from the YC post:
>
> "we push software to your machines any time we want,
> whether or not it's urgent, without testing it" seems to be
> core to the model...
>
> Updates need to be tested inside an organization's lab, and then
> test
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 12:40 AM wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:27:17PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > And even you Hans, leave out the major, all encompassing, reason for the
> > lack of market share, which is that most business that have a
> computerized
> > system to run things
Contrary to popular belief, the QWERTY layout was not designed to slow the
typist down, but rather to speed up typing.
Indeed, there is evidence that, aside from the issue of jamming, placing
often-used keys farther apart increases typing speed, because it encourages
alternation between the ha
hlyg (12024-07-21):
> is it possible to remap keyboard to Dvorak in X Window?
Yes, of course.
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Debian+dvorak
> does anyone use it
> to speed up typing?
No, only to feel smug.
# Later experiments have shown th
On 7/21/24 02:33, Russell L. Harris wrote:
The same reasons the standard typewriter keyboard is QWERTY rather
than Dvorak:
= The precedent set by the first to market is powerful.
= The influence of advertising upon a populace lacking in discernment
and addicted to novelty is deadly.
Add to t
was Linux deployed on
> those machines. And nothing would be different if Crowdstrike didn't
> exist, as some other equally useless vendor would be involved.
>
> There is a need to examine why companies are putting high privilege
> junk software on their machines. It's got nothing to do with Linux
> vs Windows.
Jeff
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:17:54AM +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> The CrowdStrike outage emulated the very thing it is alleged to protect
> against - a zero day exploit.
It was also a demonstration of a huge vulnerability. If $EvilActor were to get
an agent employed at CrowdStrike/whoever then the
arch will
tell you what to do but not why, I have sometimes found that the recommendation
is wrong and that enabling something else is a better solution.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 https://www.phcomp
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:27:17PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
> And even you Hans, leave out the major, all encompassing, reason for the
> lack of market share, which is that most business that have a computerized
> system to run things also value what their MBA says. And since there is no
ing in this story would be different if it was Linux deployed on
those machines. And nothing would be different if Crowdstrike didn't
exist, as some other equally useless vendor would be involved.
There is a need to examine why companies are putting high privilege
junk software on their machine
On 21/7/24 10:07, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
All this points to an incompetent board. If someone's head is going to
be taken (figuratively), then it should start with the CEO and other
executives.
Yes.
But, the people who should be sacked, with loss of benefits, are the
board members and the CE
goes through a release cascade, with
> each organization deciding which of the most recent three versions each
> of their computers will get) but just with a data-files update (which,
> as we have seen here, appears to go out to all clients regardless of
> version).
At minimum, it is neg
On 21/7/24 07:28, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
Again lacking data center experience? Every server in your data center
that is outward-facing will be contacted by intruders on its open ports.
That includes your Debian servers. If your apache server or application
server running on Debian is vulne
On 21/7/24 06:38, The Wanderer wrote:
The first would be poor institutional practice; the others would be
potentially-questionable software design, although it's hard to know
without seeing the internal architecture of the software in question and
understanding*why* it's designe
Windows
For this specific issue, if Linux were used at the same scale and
for the same purposes as these affected Windows machines, then a
similar issue would affect Linux sooner or later.
The reason why this is the case is that the current motivation for
the use of Crowdstrike's softwa
ual new client version (which goes through a release cascade, with
> each organization deciding which of the most recent three versions each
> of their computers will get) but just with a data-files update (which,
> as we have seen here, appears to go out to all clients regardless of
> ver
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 2:09 PM Joe wrote:
>
> You missed one: Linux is virtually a virus-free environment, and a
> large user base would mean many more people running as root, and it
> would become worth the time of malware writers to target Linux. Linux
> would become as virus-ridden as Windows.
with a data-files update (which,
as we have seen here, appears to go out to all clients regardless of
version).
The first would be poor institutional practice; the others would be
potentially-questionable software design, although it's hard to know
without seeing the internal architecture
Thank Clug and all that reply !
On 7/20/24 18:36, George at Clug wrote:
Do you think Windows is not reliable? Why is that?
Windows used to crash often, i rarely use it now, they say it's more
stable these day
Do you use Linux yourself?
surely i use as this is debian user list
Hav
Andy Smith (12024-07-20):
> And yes here in the UK where we allowed the Post Office to pay
> billions to Fujitsu to develop the Horizon IT system that
> incorrectly accused hundreds of postmasters of fraud, resulting in
> criminal prosecutions and at least one case of suicide.
That was not a bug,
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 09:44:52PM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> It seems clear to me that what's needed is a change in the law. At the
> moment here in the UK we have national news services explaining that
> airline passengers won't be able to get compensation because the
> 'even
e reliable than Windows
>
> For this specific issue, if Linux were used at the same scale and
> for the same purposes as these affected Windows machines, then a
> similar issue would affect Linux sooner or later.
>
> The reason why this is the case is that the current motivation
I would think linux is better as server OS due to reasons of security,
performance and
Operability etc.
Once aol mail was running on windows. But now aol is merged into yahoo
mail which was originally run on freebsd but now linux mostly.
And the initial hotmail was running on freebsd too IIRC
sed at the same scale and
for the same purposes as these affected Windows machines, then a
similar issue would affect Linux sooner or later.
The reason why this is the case is that the current motivation for
the use of Crowdstrike's software on those Windows machines would
be exactly the sam
> You missed one: Linux is virtually a virus-free environment, and a
> large user base would mean many more people running as root, and it
> would become worth the time of malware writers to target Linux. Linux
> would become as virus-ridden as Windows.
>
> It would also become a target for data h
take more than an eighth grade education to see why
they won't ever recommend linux no matter how superior it may be at the
end of a P&L report. They have to have someone to sue. Bill Shakespear
said it best when he wrote "first, we kill all the lawyers." But MBA's
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:59:14 +0200
Hans wrote:
> Hello,
>
> well, the thing is: Do we really want to go to more market share?
>
> Let's imagine, Debian becomes market relevant, what will happen?
> Sure, more developers get paid, what is very nice. But not all
> developers will.
>
> Many good d
The same reasons the standard typewriter keyboard is QWERTY rather
than Dvorak:
= The precedent set by the first to market is powerful.
= The influence of advertising upon a populace lacking in discernment
and addicted to novelty is deadly.
Add to that extortion and bribes and a compromised leg
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 12:16 AM wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 02:45:37PM +1000, David wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 11:54 +0800, hlyg wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of
> > > development?
> >
Which is not quite correct. As a hamradio (I am one), you are allowed to
develop your very owh rf-devices. Transceivers, measure equipment, whatever
you like.
Many things, we are using today in consumer devices are first developed by
radio amateurs (example shorthand "packet radio", which is da
On 7/20/24 09:58, Larry Martell wrote:
I’ve never owned a machine running windows in my life.
I've owned one. I needed a lappy I could use with a gps for roadmap, had
the then new XP on it, cleared the disk a week later and put mandrake on
it because XP had no drivers that could run the broadco
gene heskett (12024-07-20):
> > If they were, you'd have support for software-defined radio signal
> > processing in FFmpeg, for example.
> Which the current rules for such does not allow, by FCC edicts, only sealed
> FCC approved blobs are allowed to play in the rf field.
> So don't blame the code
On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 23:59 Hans wrote:
> Hello,
>
> well, the thing is: Do we really want to go to more market share?
>
> Let's imagine, Debian becomes market relevant, what will happen? Sure, more
> developers get paid, what is very nice. But not all developers will.
>
> Many good dev
On 7/20/24 04:28, Nicolas George wrote:
hlyg (12024-07-20):
Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
develop more apps,
The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necessarily
the ones w
Hello,
well, the thing is: Do we really want to go to more market share?
Let's imagine, Debian becomes market relevant, what will happen? Sure, more
developers get paid, what is very nice. But not all developers will.
Many good developers will not be paid and when the market will rule things,
I’ve never owned a machine running windows in my life.
On 20/7/24 18:35, George at Clug wrote:
On Saturday, 20-07-2024 at 13:54 hlyg wrote:
> crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
The CrowdStrike issue was not a Windows issue, it was a CrowdStrike issue.
The problem did not affect our Windows computers as we have no
My reason to keep windows is that I can’t play Starcraft under Linux.
--
Jeff Pang
jeffp...@aol.com
On 2024-07-20, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2024 16:57 +0800, from hlyg2...@outlook.com (hlyg):
>> statistics about market share might come from web servers and game servers,
>> they know how many users use linux and Windows.
>
> No. They at most can know what platform user agents report.
On 2024-07-20, Michael Grant wrote:
> OpenOffice is quite featureful, it is not 100% bug for bug compatible with
> real MS Office products.
I failed to read an old version word file on a newer word. And succeed
with libreoffice. So yes it's not 100% bug compatible :)
> choices. There is no clea
On 20 Jul 2024 16:57 +0800, from hlyg2...@outlook.com (hlyg):
> statistics about market share might come from web servers and game servers,
> they know how many users use linux and Windows.
No. They at most can know what platform user agents report.
Which isn't necessarily the same thing at all.
On 20 Jul 2024 17:25 +0800, from jeremy.ard...@gmail.com (jeremy ardley):
>> A lot of paid-for programmer time isn't necessarily for what the
>> individual programmer_wants_ to do. If one's employer dictates that
>> their products should support Mac OS and Windows, for example, then
>> there's usu
Am 20.07.2024 um 05:54 schrieb hlyg:
> why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of development?
I want to kickoff by reminding, that WHY questions are rarely useful, it
is what small kidz are asking, when they want to learn, how to argue
with adults. ;-)
But approaching t
t for almost every tool like Gimp for Photoshop but
> it's not Photoshop. Most photographers have heard of or used Photoshop,
> but not many know or know about Gimp. These are just a few examples,
> there are many others. This effect has a knock-on effect of lower
> uptake
ays with.
>
> it is evident that many people around still use Windows
I would agree that Windows is the most used OS for desktop PCs.
>
> i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
Do you think Windows is not reliable? Why is that?
>
> according to some statistics linu
On 7/20/24 15:02, Michel Verdier wrote:
Linux is not on the market. I buy M$ but download debian. How can you say
how many people is using debian? Once upon a time there was a
linuxcounter...
Thank tomas, Verdier and George!
statistics about market share might come from web servers and game
On 20/7/24 16:56, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 20 Jul 2024 10:28 +0200, fromgeo...@nsup.org (Nicolas George):
Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
develop more apps,
The programmers who are attra
On 20 Jul 2024 10:28 +0200, from geo...@nsup.org (Nicolas George):
>> Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
>> recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
>> develop more apps,
>
> The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necess
hlyg (12024-07-20):
> Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
> recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
> develop more apps,
The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necessarily
the ones who are interested in developing qualit
Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
develop more apps, which attract more users. e.g. many vpn providers
support Windows and android, not linux.
linux can get distributed by word-of-mouth if it i
On 2024-07-20, hlyg wrote:
> i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
no doubt :)
> according to some statistics linux has only 4% desktop market, 73% for MS, 15%
> for MacOS
Linux is not on the market. I buy M$ but download debian. How can you say
how many people is using debian? Once u
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 02:45:37PM +1000, David wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 11:54 +0800, hlyg wrote:
[...]
> > why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of
> > development?
>
> Because people don't have it hammered into them via the educati
nly 4% desktop market, 73%
> for
> MS, 15% for MacOS
Market share is not a reliable recommendation for quality.
How much market share do Rolls Royce or Bugatti have?
> why free OS hasn't gained more share even after 30 years of
> development?
Because people don't have it ham
crowdstrike makes news headlines, many Windows become blue screens
it is evident that many people around still use Windows
i wonder if linux is more reliable than Windows
according to some statistics linux has only 4% desktop market, 73% for
MS, 15% for MacOS
why free OS hasn't gained
On 2024-07-19 11:09, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-19 10:42, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2024-07-19 at 10:34, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-18 09:52, Gary Dale wrote:
Thanks for the tips guys, but I'm not going to switch to XFCE, I'm
using an old AMD graphics card, it's a desktop machine, and the
prob
On 2024-07-19 10:42, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2024-07-19 at 10:34, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-18 09:52, Gary Dale wrote:
Thanks for the tips guys, but I'm not going to switch to XFCE, I'm
using an old AMD graphics card, it's a desktop machine, and the
problem isn't specific to PDFs - although t
On 2024-07-19 at 10:34, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 2024-07-18 09:52, Gary Dale wrote:
>> Thanks for the tips guys, but I'm not going to switch to XFCE, I'm
>> using an old AMD graphics card, it's a desktop machine, and the
>> problem isn't specific to PDFs - although that seems to be one of
>> the ma
On 2024-07-18 09:52, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-17 21:25, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running Debian/Trixie on an AMD64 system, using the Plasma 5 over
X desktop. Firefox 115.12.0esr is crashing multiple times per day. It
frequently happens when page I'm transfers to another page that
creates a PDF
getting elderly is brilliant.
After getting everything just nice, experienced several system crashes.
"I'll install the nvidia driver and see if that fixes it."
Then I remember why I tried to remove the nvidia driver.
an upgrade caused X to refuse to start.
Install No3 and halfway
On 2024-07-18 13:51, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:41:50AM -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 07:55 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
HOW did you upgrade? Did you go via 11?
Fresh install on reformatted boot and root partitions.
OK
I can't do that with my o
On 2024-07-18 09:52, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2024-07-17 21:25, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running Debian/Trixie on an AMD64 system, using the Plasma 5 over
X desktop. Firefox 115.12.0esr is crashing multiple times per day. It
frequently happens when page I'm transfers to another page that
creates a PDF
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:41:50AM -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 07:55 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >
> > HOW did you upgrade? Did you go via 11?
> >
> Fresh install on reformatted boot and root partitions.
>
OK
> > > I can't do that with my old Dell Vostro 1700 because
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 07:55 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:00:06PM -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-07-17 at 22:17 -0400, e...@gmx.us wrote:
> > > On 7/17/24 21:25, Gary Dale wrote:
> > > > I'm running Debian/Trixie on an AMD64 system, using the Plasma
> > > >
On 2024-07-17 21:25 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> I'm running Debian/Trixie on an AMD64 system, using the Plasma 5 over
> X desktop. Firefox 115.12.0esr is crashing multiple times per day. It
> frequently happens when page I'm transfers to another page that
> creates a PDF or just has a complicated li
On 2024-07-17 21:25, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running Debian/Trixie on an AMD64 system, using the Plasma 5 over
X desktop. Firefox 115.12.0esr is crashing multiple times per day. It
frequently happens when page I'm transfers to another page that
creates a PDF or just has a complicated link. It's an
On 2024-07-18 04:00, Van Snyder wrote:
On Wed, 2024-07-17 at 22:17 -0400, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 7/17/24 21:25, Gary Dale wrote:
> I'm running Debian/Trixie on an AMD64 system, using the Plasma 5
> over X
> desktop. Firefox 115.12.0esr is crashing multiple times per day. It
> frequently happens w
1 - 100 of 4147 matches
Mail list logo
