On 2020-09-11 07:21, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 10 Sep 2020 at 16:15:05 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
On 2020-09-09 23:02, David wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 11:26, David Christensen
wrote:
On 2020-09-09 08:03, David Wright wrote:
... having been bitten by
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
On Fri 11 Sep 2020 at 13:03:44 (+1000), David wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 08:30, David Christensen
> wrote:
> > On 2020-09-10 09:44, David Wright wrote:
>
> > > I don't like parted particularly, and don't know what "free" does.
> > > Can you elucidate?
>
> > > $ man parted | grep -i free
>
On Thu 10 Sep 2020 at 16:15:05 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-09-09 23:02, David wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 11:26, David Christensen
> > wrote:
> > > On 2020-09-09 08:03, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > > > ... having been bitten by
> > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
On 2020-09-10 20:03, David wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 08:30, David Christensen... wrote:
On 2020-09-10 09:44, David Wright wrote:
I don't like parted particularly, and don't know what "free" does.
Can you elucidate?
$ man parted | grep -i free
$ info --output=/dev/stdout --subnodes par
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 09:15, David Christensen
wrote:
> On 2020-09-09 23:02, David wrote:
> > parted /dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST3300622AS_ 'unit compact print
> > free unit s print free unit b print free'
> That parted(8) incantation has issues
It works for me, but then again my disks are n
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 08:30, David Christensen
wrote:
> On 2020-09-10 09:44, David Wright wrote:
> > I don't like parted particularly, and don't know what "free" does.
> > Can you elucidate?
> > $ man parted | grep -i free
> > $ info --output=/dev/stdout --subnodes parted | grep -i free
> I al
On 2020-09-09 23:02, David wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 11:26, David Christensen
wrote:
On 2020-09-09 08:03, David Wright wrote:
... having been bitten by
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923561
I have a 300 GB drive that has been causing me some confusion. Did I
elicit
On 2020-09-10 09:44, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 10 Sep 2020 at 16:02:59 (+1000), David wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 11:26, David Christensen
wrote:
,,, I'm not sure what to ask for in terms of the encryption:
See cryptsetup(8) with the 'isLuks' action and/or the '-v' option.
For exampl
On Thu 10 Sep 2020 at 16:02:59 (+1000), David wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 11:26, David Christensen
> wrote:
> > On 2020-09-09 08:03, David Wright wrote:
>
> > > ... having been bitten by
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923561
>
> > I have a 300 GB drive that has been
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 11:26, David Christensen
wrote:
> On 2020-09-09 08:03, David Wright wrote:
> > ... having been bitten by
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923561
> I have a 300 GB drive that has been causing me some confusion. Did I
> elicity the bug when I partitione
On 2020-09-09 08:03, David Wright wrote:
... having been bitten by
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923561
I have a 300 GB drive that has been causing me some confusion. Did I
elicity the bug when I partitioned the disk as follows?
2020-03-03 08:39:57 root@po ~
# pa
David Wright writes:
> On Wed 09 Sep 2020 at 08:53:20 (-0600), Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
>> > On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 04:39:05 PM David Christensen wrote:
>> >> Neither the string "2 MiB" nor the string "2 M" appear on page you have
>> >> cited.
>> >
>> > That is co
On Wed 09 Sep 2020 at 08:53:20 (-0600), Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> > On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 04:39:05 PM David Christensen wrote:
> >> Neither the string "2 MiB" nor the string "2 M" appear on page you have
> >> cited.
> >
> > That is correct, that's is what I have no
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 04:39:05 PM David Christensen wrote:
>> Neither the string "2 MiB" nor the string "2 M" appear on page you have
>> cited.
>
> That is correct, that's is what I have not found on that page.
>
>> Please provide a URL that advocates "start
On Tue 08 Sep 2020 at 17:43:21 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 04:39:05 PM David Christensen wrote:
> > Neither the string "2 MiB" nor the string "2 M" appear on page you have
> > cited.
>
> That is correct, that's is what I have not found on that page.
>
> >
On 2020-09-08 14:43, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 04:39:05 PM David Christensen wrote:
Neither the string "2 MiB" nor the string "2 M" appear on page you have
cited.
That is correct, that's is what I have not found on that page.
Please provide a URL that advocat
On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 04:39:05 PM David Christensen wrote:
> Neither the string "2 MiB" nor the string "2 M" appear on page you have
> cited.
That is correct, that's is what I have not found on that page.
> Please provide a URL that advocates "start the first partition at 2 MIB"
Maybe
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:53:00PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes
that leaves room for whatever may need to be at the beginning of the disk
(like maybe the MBR, or LILO, or ???)?
The current basic default is 1MByte
On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 12:53:00 PM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096
bytes that leaves room for whatever may need to be at the beginning of the
disk (like maybe the MBR, or LILO, or ???)?
I've seen the advice to
On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 12:53 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes
> that leaves room for whatever may need to be at the beginning of the disk
> (like maybe the MBR, or LILO, or ???)?
I believe it's for &#
Sorry, the Wikipedia article is Advanced Format:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format
On Tuesday, September 08, 2020 12:53:00 PM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096
> bytes that leaves room for whatever may need to be
Why start the first partition at 2 MIB, why not at any multiple of 4096 bytes
that leaves room for whatever may need to be at the beginning of the disk
(like maybe the MBR, or LILO, or ???)?
I've seen the advice to align partitions properly by starting them at a
multiple of 4096 bytes,
22 matches
Mail list logo
