lp")
There is a good tutorial here: https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/HowToUse
from hard disk to the desktop (apt complains when
I load it directly).
4-. Executed: sudo apt install firmware-realtek
5-. Executed: sudo depmod -a
6-. Executed: sudo modprobe r8712u
Then, Wicd didn't show anything. I ran udevadm, I don't remember how,
to see if the USB WiFi adapter wa
t; les informations
techniques d'une connexion Wifi ?
A titre d'information, sur Mac, on a par exemple le channel, le nombre
de NSS, etc.
Avec Network Manager, je n'ai pas ces infos sur Debian...
Peut-être avec un autre outil ? Une extension de Gnome ?
Merci d'avance.
David.
"facilement" les informations
> techniques d'une connexion Wifi ?
> A titre d'information, sur Mac, on a par exemple le channel, le nombre
> de NSS, etc.
> Avec Network Manager, je n'ai pas ces infos sur Debian...
>
> Peut-être avec un autre outil ? Une extension de Gnome ?
>
> Merci d'avance.
>
> David.
>
>
On 2/26/21 11:00 AM, David BERCOT wrote:
Bonjour,
Savez-vous comment on peut obtenir "facilement" les informations
techniques d'une connexion Wifi ?
A titre d'information, sur Mac, on a par exemple le channel, le nombre
de NSS, etc.
Avec Network Manager, je n'ai pas ces infos
bonjour
j'utilise LinSSID
je ne sais si ça correspond à ton besoin
Le 26/02/2021 à 11:00, David BERCOT a écrit :
Bonjour,
Savez-vous comment on peut obtenir "facilement" les informations
techniques d'une connexion Wifi ?
A titre d'information, sur Mac, on a par exemple le c
Bonjour,
Savez-vous comment on peut obtenir "facilement" les informations
techniques d'une connexion Wifi ?
A titre d'information, sur Mac, on a par exemple le channel, le nombre
de NSS, etc.
Avec Network Manager, je n'ai pas ces infos sur Debian...
Peut-être avec un autre o
David (12021-02-19):
> This link reports setting "D3 cold" or similar in BIOS worked for that
> Intel 3165, does that help you?
> https://askubuntu.com/questions/1204683/intel-3165-not-working-on-ubuntu-19-10
Thank you both. I had not found that link.
I tried looking in the setup as suggested,
a proposed enhancement to your
search term:
"can't change power state" +wifi +linux
on DDG yields some possibly promising hits:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=261636
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/bug-cant-change-power-state-from-d3cold-to-d0-config-space-inaccessi
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 21:31, Nicolas George wrote:
> [ 19.292289] iwlwifi :01:00.0: can't change power state from D3hot to
> D0 (config space inaccessible)
This link reports setting "D3 cold" or similar in BIOS worked for that
Intel 3165, does that help you?
[ Re-sending this mail, because it didn't arrive the first time. ]
Hi.
I have one of the laptops given to the students and teachers of
Île-de-France, i.e. cheap hardware (overcharged to taxpayers), booted
with Debian Live (KDE+firmware edition), and the wifi does not work.
The wifi controller
i've solved on my own again:
iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
wpa-ssid JHotel
wpa-key-mgmt NONE
it's copied from debian
handbook:https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/sect.network-config.en.html#sect.interface-wireless
i'm sure it's ok because it use same freq 2437 MHZ as fedora
i've moved to other hotel, wifi is good, it seems closer to APthough freq is
still 2412 MHz
On 11/02/2021 10:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
FWIW, Debian stable's current kernel is 4.19.
Cheers
- t
I don't think OP bothered to update his system.
--
Kind regards,
pioruns2019
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 22:00, Long Wind wrote:
> i've solved on my own:
>
> allow-hotplug wlx502b73d50a69
> iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
> wireless-mode managed
> wireless-essid JHotel
>
> at first, 3rd line is missing, that's cause of trouble
> link/level is around 60 though it uses freq
i've solved on my own:
allow-hotplug wlx502b73d50a69
iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
wireless-mode managed
wireless-essid JHotel
at first, 3rd line is missing, that's cause of troublelink/level is around 60
though it uses freq 2412 MHz
Thanks to all that reply!
our computer is using a different program (than my computer does)
> to control your WIFI interface.
>
> You need to figure out what that is, and use whatever method it requires
> to force the channel change to 2462 MHz.
>
> I am sorry, I cannot help you with that, because
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 04:38, Long Wind wrote:
> Thank David! but /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf doesn't exist.
Ok. If /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf doesn't exist, that means
that your computer is using a different program (than my computer does)
to control your W
ot;JHotel"
freq_list=2462
...
}
WARNING: This will configure your wifi to ONLY work
on channel 11 on this SSID and it will ignore all other channels
on this SSID.
The documentation is in
/usr/share/doc/wpasupplicant/examples/wpa_supplicant.conf
want to see:
freq: 2462
Do NOT post your wpa_supplicant.conf file here,
because it contains private password information.
Some basic explanation:
https://www.metageek.com/training/resources/why-channels-1-6-11.html
https://www.metageek.com/training/resources/wifi-signal-strength-basics.html
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:04:45AM +, Long Wind wrote:
> i don't know how to find out firmware, i guess it uses same as debian
Don't guess.
dpkg -l | grep firmware
Thank David! below is your requested output by ubuntu and debianbut link/level
in debian is above 50, it's ok, i'm afraid it offer little clue to my problem
output by ubuntu:zhou@zhou-Lenovo:~$ iw dev wlx502b73d50a69 info
Interface wlx502b73d50a69
ifindex 2
wdev 0x1
addr
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:18:49AM +, pioruns2020 wrote:
> On 11/02/2021 10:04, Long Wind wrote:
> >here is Ubuntu's kernel, according "uname -a"
> >Linux zhou-Lenovo 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29
> >18:03:19 UTC 2019 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
> >
> >it's built from
On 11/02/2021 10:04, Long Wind wrote:
here is Ubuntu's kernel, according "uname -a"
Linux zhou-Lenovo 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29
18:03:19 UTC 2019 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
it's built from stretch/sid according its /etc/debian_version
i don't know how to find out
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 09:46, Long Wind wrote:
> auto wlx502b73d50a69
> iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
> wireless-essid JHotel
> i use above to set up wireless connection in stretch
> but often link/level is low (about 30) according to xosview
> and connection can be easily lost
> if
here is Ubuntu's kernel, according "uname -a"
Linux zhou-Lenovo 4.15.0-45-generic #48~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 29 18:03:19
UTC 2019 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
it's built from stretch/sid according its /etc/debian_version
i don't know how to find out firmware, i guess it uses same as debian
Le 11/02/2021 à 07:42, Long Wind a écrit :
zhou@debian:~$ inxi -F
System:
Host: debian Kernel: 4.9.0-8-686-pae i686 bits: 32 Desktop: twm
Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)
[...]
Topology: Dual Core model: Pentium E6500 bits: 64 type: MCP
[...]
Device-1: Ralink MT7601U Wireless
On Mi, 10 feb 21, 22:45:23, Long Wind wrote:
> auto wlx502b73d50a69
> iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
> wireless-essid JHotel
> i use above to set up wireless connection in stretchbut often link/level is
> low (about 30) according to xosviewand connection can be easily lostif
> link/level is
you mean i stick with ubuntu?i'm long-time user of debianubuntu is new to me,
i'm not comfortable with it
Long Wind writes:
> ubuntu can easily connect above link/level 60, it's stable
If you mean with same hardware and same location then why not stick with
it since it works better? If you don't mean that then what do you mean?
On 2/10/21 5:40 PM, Long Wind wrote:
i've just installed inxi, but i don't think it's helpful
try inxi -F
zhou@debian:~$ inxi
CPU: Dual Core Pentium E6500 (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 1603/1603/2936 MHz
Kernel: 4.9.0-8-686-pae i686 Up: 4m Mem: 390.5/4005.9 MiB (9.7%)
Storage: 74.53 GiB (42.2%
On 10/02/2021 22:45, Long Wind wrote:
auto wlx502b73d50a69
iface wlx502b73d50a69 inet dhcp
wireless-essid JHotel
Means nothing. You need to provide full report from inxi or similar tool.
i use above to set up wireless connection in stretch
but often link/level is low (about 30) according to
maine des puces de communication sans fil est la
réglementation, qui interdit les fabricant de fournir du
matériel qui serait capable d'opérer en dehors des bandes
autorisées.
Il y avait également un ou plusieurs message concernant quelques
références pour des puces wifi libres, mais elle ne semblaien
eventuellement ...
Merci a vous
Le lun. 8 févr. 2021 à 18:12, jerome moliere a
écrit :
> Bonjour a tous,
> je suis victime d'un souci sournois sur 1 laptop System76 lemur pro dote
> de composants Intel 11eme generation.
> Suite a l'upgrade du kernel en 5.10-2 (et 3 depuis) je n'ai plus de wif
boote pas
...-(
La carte Wifi est vue par le systeme avec lspci -nnk et le module essaie de
se charger Et juste avant l'update (jusqu'a Dimanche soir ou Lundi)
elle fonctionnait tres biem
Cela me parait etre du soft pur et dur
Pour les numeros de version a noter que Garuda (Arch based
> [4.769684] iwlwifi :00:14.3: check git://
> git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git
> [4.769744] iwlwifi :00:14.3: Couldn't request the fw
> [4.783252] iwlwifi: probe of :00:14.3 failed with error -2
[...]
> Que puis je faire ?
Bonjour a tous,
je suis victime d'un souci sournois sur 1 laptop System76 lemur pro dote de
composants Intel 11eme generation.
Suite a l'upgrade du kernel en 5.10-2 (et 3 depuis) je n'ai plus de wifi:
- lspci voit toujours la carte lspci -nnk
lspci -nnk|grep -i network
Bonjour François,
c'est tout à fait normal que ton wifi plante du fait que ta carte
ne dispose pas du bon module ...
En premier tu vas chercher sur le dépôt Git la référence suivante :
- rtl8188ce.ko
la documentation se trouve en anglais sur ce site :
https://askubuntu.com/questions/296833
- Mail original -
> De: "Francois Meyer"
> À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Vendredi 5 Février 2021 12:45:12
> Objet: wifi qui se déconnecte
>
> Bonjour,
>
> sur mon thinkpad sous buster, le wifi ne se met plus en place (après
>
Bonjour,
sur mon thinkpad sous buster, le wifi ne se met plus en place (après une
maj, semble-t-il).
- lspci voit bien la carte (realtek rtl 8188ce)
- lsmod voit bien les modules qui vont avec, firmware-realtek est bien
installé à jour
- iwlist voit bien les points d'accès à proximité
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 08:15:57 -0800
cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote:
> > You're going to have to be more specific about what software
> > framework you're using to manage your WiFi access, and what you
> > mean by "remove."
>
> Under XFCE, I want to clea
Celejar writes:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 07:25:45 -0800
> cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote:
>
> > How do you remove a WiFi AP in Buster?
>
> You're going to have to be more specific about what software framework
> you're using to manage your WiFi access, and
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 07:25:45 -0800
cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote:
> How do you remove a WiFi AP in Buster?
You're going to have to be more specific about what software framework
you're using to manage your WiFi access, and what you mean by "remove."
Celejar
How do you remove a WiFi AP in Buster?
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover, cono...@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/
On 2021-01-26 01:05, basti wrote:
On 26.01.21 09:28, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 25 ian 21, 20:16:21, basti wrote:
Hello,
at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
WAN in 2 months.
I'm search for wifi AP to get the best out of my WAN connection.
I know I need
On 2021-01-26 01:07, basti wrote:
On 26.01.21 00:39, David Christensen wrote:
Am 25.01.21 um 20:16 schrieb basti:
Hello,
at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
WAN in 2 months.
I'm search for wifi AP to get the best out of my WAN connection.
I know I need 5GHz
Am 26.01.21 um 17:25 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
>> I mean wifi 802.11n so I get round about 4 MB/s if I would get 30-40
>> MB/s its ok.
>
> Thanks! I see so few reports of wifi rates with which I can relate,
> that it's like a breath of fresh air.
>
> I have seen 25MB/s
> I mean wifi 802.11n so I get round about 4 MB/s if I would get 30-40
> MB/s its ok.
Thanks! I see so few reports of wifi rates with which I can relate,
that it's like a breath of fresh air.
I have seen 25MB/s actual download rate on my smartphone when connected
over wifi in a coffe
On 26.01.21 16:31, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:59:43PM +0100, basti wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Yes I know, Wifi can't get 1Gbit at the moment, I would only get close
>> to it. 500Mbit/s are also OK (the TP-link Archer C7) seems to get it and
>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:59:43PM +0100, basti wrote:
[...]
>
> Yes I know, Wifi can't get 1Gbit at the moment, I would only get close
> to it. 500Mbit/s are also OK (the TP-link Archer C7) seems to get it and
> this is much more than my 300Mbit that I have at the moment.
>
If 30
> Well,
> judging by your e-mail address you are from Germany.
> Check your local magazines for some reviews (C't might be one).
> If you really think you can get a 1Gbit stream via Wifi you
> are fantazing. If you have a decent router connect via cable.
> And if you are c
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 10:05 +0100, basti wrote:
> On 26.01.21 09:28, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 25 ian 21, 20:16:21, basti wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250
> > > Mbit up
> > > WAN in
On Ma, 26 ian 21, 10:05:30, basti wrote:
> On 26.01.21 09:28, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 25 ian 21, 20:16:21, basti wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
> >> WAN in 2 months.
> >> I'm sea
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:00:44PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
[...]
> AIUI the embedded Linux inside Ubiquiti products is "EdgeOS".
>
>
> STFW I am not finding much. This should be it:
>
> https://github.com/EdgeOS/
As far as my search engineering [0] reaches for now, EdgeOS is
a
On 26.01.21 00:39, David Christensen wrote:
>> Am 25.01.21 um 20:16 schrieb basti:
>>> Hello,
>>> at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
>>> WAN in 2 months.
>>> I'm search for wifi AP to get the best out of my W
On 26.01.21 09:28, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 25 ian 21, 20:16:21, basti wrote:
>> Hello,
>> at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
>> WAN in 2 months.
>> I'm search for wifi AP to get the best out of my WAN connection.
On Lu, 25 ian 21, 20:16:21, basti wrote:
> Hello,
> at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
> WAN in 2 months.
> I'm search for wifi AP to get the best out of my WAN connection.
> I know I need 5GHz wifi.
>
> Are there any recommends?
A dev
On 2021-01-25 14:53, Dan Ritter wrote:
Frank Michael Dienst wrote:
Hi,
have a look to ubiquiti-AP.
https://www.ui.com/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-pro/
The AP-AC-Pro systems with two RJ45-connectors work with bonding up to 2,5
Gbit.
Has Ubiquiti started complying with the GPL yet? They were
Am 25.01.21 um 20:16 schrieb basti:
Hello,
at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
WAN in 2 months.
I'm search for wifi AP to get the best out of my WAN connection.
I know I need 5GHz wifi.
Are there any recommends?
On 2021-01-25 13:11, Frank Michael Dienst
Frank Michael Dienst wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> have a look to ubiquiti-AP.
>
> https://www.ui.com/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-pro/
>
> The AP-AC-Pro systems with two RJ45-connectors work with bonding up to 2,5
> Gbit.
Has Ubiquiti started complying with the GPL yet? They were
remarkably bad about it in years
Hi,
have a look to ubiquiti-AP.
https://www.ui.com/unifi/unifi-ap-ac-pro/
The AP-AC-Pro systems with two RJ45-connectors work with bonding up to
2,5 Gbit.
Am 25.01.21 um 20:16 schrieb basti:
Hello,
at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
WAN in 2 months
Hello,
at the moment I use 802.11n /2.4GHz wifi. I get 1 Gbit down/250 Mbit up
WAN in 2 months.
I'm search for wifi AP to get the best out of my WAN connection.
I know I need 5GHz wifi.
Are there any recommends?
best regards
Le 20/01/2021 à 22:13, benoit a écrit :
[...]
En cherchant j'ai trouvé un post sur le forum d'ubuntu suggérant de désactiver
le secure-boot dans le bios.
Ainsi le module 8821ce a pu se charger et le wifi fonctionne !
[...]
Ah, oui, j'avais totalement oublié ce problème: le Secure Boot ne
.0-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_8821ce.ko
/lib/modules/5.10.0-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw88_8821c.ko
/lib/modules/5.10.0-1-amd64/updates/dkms/8821ce.ko
J'ai viré le module rtw88_8821ce, car network-manager ne détecte aucun réseau
wifi (il y en a).
m
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 19:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 19 ian 21, 10:37:57, Gareth Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 07:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:51:21, Gareth Evans wrote:
> >
> > > > I thought without eg. connman
On Ma, 19 ian 21, 10:37:57, Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 07:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:51:21, Gareth Evans wrote:
>
> > > I thought without eg. connman, a dropped connection on a wifi NIC
> > > configured in /etc/network/inte
.d) config override nm (etc)?
>
> It should (barring misconfiguration).
>
> > I thought without eg. connman, a dropped connection on a wifi NIC
> > configured in /etc/network/interfaces would not automatically be
> > re-established,
>
> The physical WiFi connection i
out eg. connman, a dropped connection on a wifi NIC
> configured in /etc/network/interfaces would not automatically be
> re-established,
The physical WiFi connection is established and maintained by
wpasupplicant, which runs as a daemon and should reconnect as needed.
The major di
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, at 20:33, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-18 01:14, Long Wind wrote:
> > buster's wifi connection is ok for several hours, so i think problem
> > disappearbut after rebooting pc, problem appears again
> > wifi is provided by hotel, they hide AP so
On 2021-01-18 01:14, Long Wind wrote:
buster's wifi connection is ok for several hours, so i think problem
disappearbut after rebooting pc, problem appears again
wifi is provided by hotel, they hide AP somewhere, i don't know where, i think
it's reliable
buster can connect to hot spot
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:14:06AM +, Long Wind wrote:
> buster's wifi connection is ok for several hours, so i think problem
> disappearbut after rebooting pc, problem appears again
> wifi is provided by hotel, they hide AP somewhere, i don't know where, i
> think it's relia
Le 17/01/2021 à 21:15, Long Wind a écrit :
wifi is ok with cell phone, it isn't with buster
allow-hotplug wlx0022c0001a59
[...]
is it a wireless card managed by the mt76 driver (perhaps am I mistaken
but the name reminds me of it)?
mt76 support having been introduced in Linux 4.19, it's
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 17 ian 21, 20:12:38, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 16 Jan 2021 at 20:57:19 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > > This
> > > may have advantages and disadvantages, but you don't get to control
> > > those :)
> >
> > In
On 2021-01-18 00:52, Long Wind wrote:
Thank David, but my problem disappear, i don't why
Maybe your neighbor(s) stopped using Wi-Fi.
Do the radio survey and see what choices you have for the active
channel(s) (2.4 and/or 5 Hhz bands).
David
On Monday, January 18, 2021, 3:53:23 PM GMT+8, David Christensen
wrote:
What is the make and model of the device that serves as your Wi-Fi
access point (AP)?
Does the AP have the ability to do a radio channel congestion survey?
Is the AP configured to automatically select a
On 2021-01-17 12:15, Long Wind wrote:
wifi is ok with cell phone, it isn't with buster
allow-hotplug wlx0022c0001a59
iface wlx0022c0001a59 inet dhcp
wireless-essid JHotel
buster can connect to wifi with above
but after some time, connection is lost
i have to run ifdown/ifup again
any idea
dpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi
> > > card with built in closed source firmware, and closed source
> > > firmware that is loaded by the kernel like ath10k. Either way the
> > > firmware is only running on the card, Not the CPU, correct?
>
On Du, 17 ian 21, 12:43:26, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> In theory, I imagine it would be possible to make some sort of hook for
> apt here. That is, in the same way that apt-listbugs and apt-listchanges
> fire off before apt runs and as "Are you still sure you want to install
> these packages?", it
On Sb, 16 ian 21, 17:04:54, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> Nothing immediate for the former, but for the latter, you may want to
> look at the 'vrms' package.
>
> It stands for 'virtual Richard M. Stallman', in honor of RMS' role as
> the orienting compass of the Free Software movement (although its
>
On Sat 16 Jan 2021 at 20:57:19 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:19:21PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
> > My main concern for the laptop in question is security. So from a
> > security standpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi
> > card
On Sat 16 Jan 2021 at 21:12:54 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
[...]
> https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware is the page giving full details.
That is quite a smart page, explaining the need for firmware during
a Debian installation succinctly. It should have some prominance for
users.
The -devel
On 17/01/2021 05:03, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Nothing immediate for the former, but for the latter, you may want to
>> look at the 'vrms' package.
> Yes, I use that as well. But that's an "opt-in", and it's rather crude
> (and operates after the fact). I think Debian would benefit from having
>
at
> runs on the system containing wireless hardware (e.g., WiFi OEM's stock
> firmware, OpenWrt, etc.).
Thanks for /that/ reminder. I totally forgot that, for a "box"
the whole thing (what we consider an operating system) also
runs as "firmware". It's "firmwares all th
Le 16/01/2021 à 22:55, Stefan Monnier a écrit :
[...]
I often enable `non-free` because I need it for one package or another
(GFDL docs for example), but I strongly dislike the fact that as soon as
it's enabled, all its packages become "silently" installable.
[...]
On this particular point,
> Nothing immediate for the former, but for the latter, you may want to
> look at the 'vrms' package.
Yes, I use that as well. But that's an "opt-in", and it's rather crude
(and operates after the fact). I think Debian would benefit from having
this kind of mechanism be much more "in your face"
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:52:25 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 12:25:10PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
> > I have a laptop with a QCA9377 Atheros AC wifi card. When I install
> > debian 10.7 amd64 I get a warning about missing non-free firmware and
On 2021-01-16 at 16:55, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/01/msg00151.html
>> Very informative.
>
> Yes, I agree with Ted Tso's suggestion.
>
> I think the `non-free` repository needs to be significantly improved, so
> that the user is properly
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/01/msg00151.html
> Very informative.
Yes, I agree with Ted Tso's suggestion.
I think the `non-free` repository needs to be significantly improved, so
that the user is properly warned/informed when something is installed
from there (in both senses:
On Saturday 16 January 2021 12:25:10 Steven Mainor wrote:
> I have a laptop with a QCA9377 Atheros AC wifi card. When I install
> debian 10.7 amd64 I get a warning about missing non-free firmware and
> the wifi doesn't work. It was my understanding that ath10k was open
> source
gt; > > standpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi card with built in
> > > closed source firmware, and closed source firmware that is loaded by the
> > > kernel like ath10k. Either way the firmware is only running on the card,
> > > Not
> > > the
Please do not top post.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:19:21PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
> My main concern for the laptop in question is security. So from a
> security standpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi card
> with built in closed source firmware, and closed source
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:19:21PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
> My main concern for the laptop in question is security. So from a
> security standpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi
> card with built in closed source firmware, and closed source
> firmware th
On Sat 16 Jan 2021 at 18:27:58 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:19:21PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
> > My main concern for the laptop in question is security. So from a security
> > standpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi card with buil
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:19:21PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
> My main concern for the laptop in question is security. So from a security
> standpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi card with built in
> closed source firmware, and closed source firmware that
My main concern for the laptop in question is security. So from a
security standpoint, what is the difference between using a wifi card
with built in closed source firmware, and closed source firmware that is
loaded by the kernel like ath10k. Either way the firmware is only
running on the card
Hi.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 12:25:10PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
> I have a laptop with a QCA9377 Atheros AC wifi card. When I install
> debian 10.7 amd64 I get a warning about missing non-free firmware and
> the wifi doesn't work. It was my understanding that ath10k was open
I have a laptop with a QCA9377 Atheros AC wifi card. When I install
debian 10.7 amd64 I get a warning about missing non-free firmware and
the wifi doesn't work. It was my understanding that ath10k was open
source and included in linux. Is this not the case?
If not is there any wireless AC
Bonjour,
Mon système d'exploiation est une Debian Sid AMD64 et j'utilise Wicd pour me
connecter automatiquement à un site cela marche très bien, cependant quand il
y a un répéteur Wifi il choisit souvent le répéteur Wifi qui a une puissance de
réception plus faible étant plus éloignée de
Le 14-12-2020, à 17:54:35 +0100, MERLIN Philippe a écrit :
Bonjour,
Mon système d'exploiation est une Debian Sid AMD64 et j'utilise Wicd pour me
connecter automatiquement à un site cela marche très bien, cependant quand il
y a un répéteur Wifi il choisit souvent le répéteur Wifi qui a une
Gracias a los dos.
De momento tampoco cuesta mucho hacer esto cada vez que actualizo el kernel:
make clean
make
make install
A ver si en las últimas versiones de kernel lo añaden, la verdad que de
momento no me está dando ningún problema.
Un saludo.
--
Josu Lazkano
701 - 800 of 5926 matches
Mail list logo
