On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:21:31PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
log. Quick check verifies that there is just the builtin 82845G
chipset video - no extra video
On 9/12/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:21:31PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
log. Quick check verifies that there
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 02:32:57PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/12/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:21:31PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:41:34PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/9/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
one note from the logs, it is selecting an initial resolution of
1920x1200. Does your monitor really support that? it looks like a
hitachi from 1996, and I'd be
Andrew: Just a quick feedback to say thanks a bunch for poring over
that lengthy post - really appreciate the details about what you tried
that worked and your insights into the verbose-yet-cryptic X error
log. Quick check verifies that there is just the builtin 82845G
chipset video - no extra
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Andrew: Just a quick feedback to say thanks a bunch for poring over
that lengthy post - really appreciate the details about what you tried
that worked and your insights into the verbose-yet-cryptic X error
log. Quick check
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
log. Quick check verifies that there is just the builtin 82845G
chipset video - no extra video card - and certainly no second
monitor(!!).
happy to help, though
Have answered my own questions about bug reporting and joining, and
have chimed in on open bugs 424952 and 438650. They both appear to be
still open, with no evidence of upstream changes yet.
(Perhaps addressed in unstable?? Not that I would dare run that on this box.)
On 9/11/07, Gordon
On 9/9/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:19:10PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel 845.
i810 is being replaced by intel, so fix up your xorg.conf to reflect
intel instead, but that's not
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel 845.
This is a fresh etch install, i386, 2004 hardware. See DETAILED
NOTES below for hardware notes, xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log.
Does anyone have X working on one of these builtin Intel 845 chipsets?
I have tried the following changes to
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:19:10PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel 845.
This is a fresh etch install, i386, 2004 hardware. See DETAILED
NOTES below for hardware notes, xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log.
Does anyone have X working on one of
On 9/9/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the detailed suggestions - too late tonight to experiment,
so will do so Monday and report back.
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:19:10PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel
12 matches
Mail list logo
