Until I had setted up testing chroot's, I was a happy apt-move user.
But now due to #342802 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=342802)
I'm looking for an alternative. Actually I don't need apt-move's mirroring
capabilities. All I want are archiving my downloaded debs and removing
Hi,
I currently have a single local apt-repo (created by apt-move) that
serves (via http) my sarge box. The apt-move.conf on that sarge box is
fairly default except for a LOCALDIR= that points to an nfs mount.
My network also consists of several etch boxes, and I would like to sync
those boxes
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:03:30 +0200
Gilles Mocellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le samedi 19 août 2006 17:45, Joseph Le-Phan a écrit :
Hello,
I recently was able to utilize apt-move for a repo on a
machine that serves a local lan. Once a machine has fetched debs
from remote repos, an apt
Thus spake Greg Madden :
Use the 'sync' option with apt-move. The man page says it will dl all
files installed on your box.
I've tried apt-move sync, but nothing appears to happen. This could
mean that either the packages used during installation found it's
way into my repo without my knowing
Hello,
I recently was able to utilize apt-move for a repo on a
machine that serves a local lan. Once a machine has fetched debs
from remote repos, an apt-move update makes those debs
available to the rest of the lan.
I'd like to know if it's possible to mirror the files
Le samedi 19 août 2006 17:45, Joseph Le-Phan a écrit :
Hello,
I recently was able to utilize apt-move for a repo on a
machine that serves a local lan. Once a machine has fetched debs
from remote repos, an apt-move update makes those debs
available to the rest of the lan.
I'd like to know
:/var/local/mirrors/debian testing main contrib
deb cdrom:[titel der DVD1]/ testing main contrib
deb cdrom:[titel der DVD2]/ testing main contrib
...
-
..fuettere? Also anders ausgedrueckt: Kann apt-move mit Quellen auf
verschiedenen DVDs umgehen? Denn man apt-move sagt:
APTSITES
Hallo,
Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Ich muss demnaechst einen Debian Mirror aus den Dateien der weekly-build
Testing DVDs bauen und eine kleine Rechnerfarm daraus speisen.
ist es wichtig, dass es ein 'richtiger' Mirror ist, oder reicht es, wenn
alle Rechner auf alle Pakete zugreifen können?
Also sprach Wolf Wiegand [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, 2 Aug 2006
21:33:13 +0200):
Hallo,
Hoi.
Richard Mittendorfer wrote:
Ich muss demnaechst einen Debian Mirror aus den Dateien der
weekly-build Testing DVDs bauen und eine kleine Rechnerfarm daraus
speisen.
ist es wichtig, dass es ein
) - and that is what
'apt-cache policy' is picking up on.
However, with the introduction of keys when priorities are equal it
appears that sources with a Releases.gpg file are preferred over ones
without (which is kind of logical).
As apt-move doesn't generate this file - unless a pin is used to
increase
Hi --
I have the following cron job that runs nightly :
/usr/bin/apt-get update
/usr/bin/apt-get autoclean
/usr/bin/apt-get -dy dist-upgrade
/usr/bin/apt-move update
/usr/bin/apt-get update
This downloads updates currently needed, and puts them into an
apt-move style archive in /usr/mirror
Hello
Chris Stiles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have the following cron job that runs nightly :
/usr/bin/apt-get update
/usr/bin/apt-get autoclean
/usr/bin/apt-get -dy dist-upgrade
/usr/bin/apt-move update
/usr/bin/apt-get update
This downloads updates currently needed, and puts
On 2/18/06, Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This downloads updates currently needed, and puts them into an
apt-move style archive in /usr/mirror, which is then picked up like so
in sources.list:
deb file:/usr/mirror/debian testing main
However, even if a file exists
Hi --
To keep ADSL usable during the day I have a script that runs the
following actions overnight:
/usr/bin/apt-get update
/usr/bin/apt-get autoclean
/usr/bin/apt-get -dy dist-upgrade
/usr/bin/apt-move update
/usr/bin/apt-get update
I have an apt-move.conf file with these values set
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:28:04PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
I read with interest about dfsbuild and would like to try it, but it
wants a Packages.pgp file from my local mirror. Setting apt-move and
gpg up for this is proving to be difficult.
short:~# gpg -K
/root/.gnupg
Simo Kauppi wrote:
James Vahn wrote:
# Set this to key name to be used for signing Release files.
SIGNINGKEY=
What is it wanting me to put there?
Hi,
I haven't used apt-move, but from the gpg point of view the name is
either the name
-move, but from the gpg point of view the name is
either the name of the user or the key-id. In your case C633A12A or
James Vahn.
The problem here is that apt-move uses gpg in batch mode and in batch
mode it cannot ask you your passphrase. In that case you shoudn't use
passphrase with your
, which is ran
from the apt-move script, to use the non-passphrase file (which is
probably not possible).
You're absolutely correct! :-)
I used Kgpg to set up a new key and remove my previous efforts. The
directions said dfsbuild must run as root, so I did the gpg keys that way
as well
I read with interest about dfsbuild and would like to try it, but it
wants a Packages.pgp file from my local mirror. Setting apt-move and
gpg up for this is proving to be difficult.
short:~# gpg -K
/root/.gnupg/secring.gpg
sec 1024D
sec 1024D/C633A12A 2005-09-24
uid James Vahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssb 1024g/14633FD3 2005-09-24
Do you see a key name for apt-move in there?
# Set this to key name to be used for signing Release files.
SIGNINGKEY=C633A12A
Title: apt-move and debootstrap: stable vs sarge
I am running sarge and am trying to run debootstrap from an apt-move repository. I first noticed that apt-move chose to name the release stable rather then sarge. So within debootstrap(0.2.45-0.2), I created /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/stable
I am running sarge and am trying to run debootstrap from an apt-move
repository. I first noticed that apt-move chose to name the release
stable rather then sarge. So within debootstrap(0.2.45-0.2), I created
/usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/stable (based on sarge).
Now when I run this command, I
Patterson, Richard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I am running sarge and am trying to run debootstrap from an apt-move
| repository. I first noticed that apt-move chose to name the release
| stable rather then sarge. So within debootstrap(0.2.45-0.2), I created
| /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts
Title: Re: Re: apt-move and debootstrap - stable vs sarge
Thank you for your response
debootstrap --resolve-deps appears to only be a valid option for the 'unstable' release I'm not sure why I'm having trouble with the 'stable' version.
Is there a query that can be run to check that my
Hallo Debian-Liste,
mit apt-move mirror habe ich mir einen lokalen mirror hier hingestellt.
Nun wie halte ich ihn aktuell?
Reicht eine cronjob für apt-move mirror aus oder muß davor noch ein
apt-get update durchgeführt werden?
Mir ist heute aufgefallen, als ich mit aptitude ein Update
Am Donnerstag 04 August 2005 10:52 schrieb Ralf Schmidt:
Hallo Debian-Liste,
mit apt-move mirror habe ich mir einen lokalen mirror hier hingestellt.
Nun wie halte ich ihn aktuell?
Reicht eine cronjob für apt-move mirror aus oder muß davor noch ein
apt-get update durchgeführt werden?
Mir
Hi ralf,
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:52 AM
Subject: mirror mit apt-move
mit apt-move mirror habe ich mir einen lokalen mirror hier hingestellt.
Nun wie halte ich ihn aktuell
Ralf Schmidt schrieb:
Hallo Debian-Liste,
mit apt-move mirror habe ich mir einen lokalen mirror hier hingestellt.
Nun wie halte ich ihn aktuell?
Reicht eine cronjob für apt-move mirror aus oder muß davor noch ein
apt-get update durchgeführt werden?
Mir ist heute aufgefallen, als ich mit
Hallo Markus,
Am Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:20:05 +0200 schrieb Markus Boas:
Schau dir mal debmirror an, ich kenn apt-move jetzt nicht aber ich hab
meinen Mirror mit debmirror erstellt und halte ihn damit auch
aktuell.
Danke für den Tipp, werde ich mir mal anschauen.
Viele Grüße aus Köln
Ralf
Ralf Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Debian-Liste,
mit apt-move mirror habe ich mir einen lokalen mirror hier
hingestellt. Nun wie halte ich ihn aktuell?
Reicht eine cronjob für apt-move mirror aus oder muß davor noch ein
apt-get update durchgeführt werden?
Ich habe das so gelöst
Hallo Ulrich,
Am Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:08:42 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Fürst:
Ich habe das so gelöst, dass ich statt apt-get update ein Script
aufrufe in dem zuerst ein autoclean gemacht wird. Dann apt-move
upgedated wird, dann apt-get upgedated wird und zum Schluss werden
noch aktuallisierbare
Ralf Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Ulrich,
Am Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:08:42 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Fürst:
Ich habe das so gelöst, dass ich statt apt-get update ein Script
aufrufe in dem zuerst ein autoclean gemacht wird. Dann apt-move
upgedated wird, dann apt-get upgedated wird und
was
wondering if I can somehow create a set of ISO images using the
machine were debian is already installed.
This is where apt-move comes in quite handy: with it, you can get the
packages you used to install your system, move them into a directory
tree quite similar to that of Debian servers (with pool
to download, but I was
wondering if I can somehow create a set of ISO images using the
machine were debian is already installed.
This is where apt-move comes in quite handy: with it, you can get the
packages you used to install your system, move them into a directory
tree quite similar
I've been using apt-move update to populate a local hierarchy for use
by my other machines via nfs:
deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable/updates main contrib non-free
Since the sarge release, however, the security updates seem
W M Brelsford wrote:
I've been using apt-move update to populate a local hierarchy for use
by my other machines via nfs:
deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable/updates main contrib non-free
Since the sarge release, however
W M Brelsford wrote:
I've been using apt-move update to populate a local hierarchy for use
by my other machines via nfs:
deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb file:/n/di/var/debian stable/updates main contrib non-free
Since the sarge release, however
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:36:03PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
I'm using apt-move since some time without problems.
Suddenly(?) the following error message appears:
The problem has been solved: It was a consecutive fault of
a DNS resolution problem. The funny thing is, that it
worked before w
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
Can you tell me exactly what apt-move command you were using when you
got that error message?
It was apt-move get, IIRC. (not in the office now...)
Cheers,
--
W. Borgert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I'm using apt-move since some time without problems.
Suddenly(?) the following error message appears:
Updating from local Packages files...
mawk: cannot open testing.i386/bak for output (Not a directory)
Unknown error: getfiles: 2.
Do you have an idea what the cause could be?
I never
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:36:03PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
I'm using apt-move since some time without problems.
Suddenly(?) the following error message appears:
Can you tell me exactly what apt-move command you were using when you
got that error message?
--
Chuan-kai Lin
http
para que los indices de los paquetes conseguidos con el update se
pasasen de una maquina a otra?. Quiero icir... Yo hago el apt-get
update, me bajo los 6 megas a una maquina y creo que con apt-move se
pueden mandar esos índices al otro, pero no se como.¿Eni jelp? :)
PD: Ya he mirado en google
On Nov 13, 12:21, Jim Bailey wrote:
Hi,
Is there a quick and dirty way to get debian to use the
/var/cache/apt/archives .debs from another machine?
Bad form to answer my own question but the answer for me seems to be
no there is however a very good tool called apt-move, which I used to
set
Aupa:
Hasta ahora me iba bien (o eso creía) utilizar apt-move para crear un
repositorio en el portátil con el que podía actualizar el sobremesa de casa.
Sin embargo, ahora que lo he actualizado añadiendo dos nuevos servidores
para instalar cinelerra y mplayer, me encuentro que cuando hago un
or at least it seems to ;)
It wont talk to /var/cache/apt/archives
I normally run 'apt-move update' to move all packages to a local
mirror. But it no longer does anything. I start it and it says:
Updating from local Packages files...
Moving files...
and thats it, it will sit there for days
Hallo,
ich habe momentan apt-move auf meinen 2 Rechnern laufen.
Die momentane (auf beiden Rechner jeweils mit apt-move local)
Vorgehensweise möchte ich optimieren. Was mich jetzt beschäftigt ist
die Frage, funktionert es mit apt-move sync den pool aktuell (nur die
installierten Pakete aller
Hallo
Wie handelt Ihr das?
Nachdem ich eine Zeit lang das ganze von Hand gemacht habe, bin ich
glücklicherweise dank eines Hinweises auf apt-proxy gestoßen. Nach kleineren
Problemen bei der Konfiguration läuft das nun super. Auf meinem Server liegen
nun alle Pakete, die in regelmäßigen
Hi,
ich bin ein wenig verzweifelt... beim Aufruf von 'apt-move move' kommt
folgender Fehler:
snip
Moving files...
sed: -e expression #1, char 281: invalid reference \6 on `s' command's
RHS
Skipping files:
Moving files:
All done, exiting.
snap
und die Pakete aus meinem Cache werden
Moin,
Moving files...
sed: -e expression #1, char 281: invalid reference \6 on `s' command's
hm.. sieht sehr stark danach aus, dass apt-move selbst bei dir kaputt
ist. Zumindest jedoch einen falschen sed-Aufruf enthält. Habe gerade
mal mein apt-move durchgegreppt und finde da nichts, dass einen 6
Hi,
danke für die schnelle Antwort.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 01:37:33PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Moin,
Moving files...
sed: -e expression #1, char 281: invalid reference \6 on `s' command's
hm.. sieht sehr stark danach aus, dass apt-move selbst bei dir kaputt
ist. Zumindest
When running apt-move mirror I'm getting a lot of errors like this:
Failed to fetch
ftp://debian.ihug.com.au/debian/pool/main/f/fontilus/fontilus_0.4-2.tar.gz Unable to
fetch file, server said '/debian/pool/main/f/fontilus/fontilus_0.4-2.tar.gz: No such
file or directory '
Failed to fetch
ftp
Hello List,
I've created my apt-get repository the way I want it. I can add Debian
packages to my heart's content. But I'm wondering what is the proper way
to remove packages from my apt-get repository.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
--
Rick King
Unix Messaging Team, Boise ID
Hello all,
I just finished downloading the necessary packages for my mirror, I did
this with the apt-move mirror command.
The problem I'm having is using the apt-move move command to move the
files from /var/cache/apt/archives to /local/debian/cache/apt/archives.
The man pages indicates
, but only
about 200 downloaded by apt-move.
Still trying...
--Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it to A and install it.
I though that apt-move sync is my freind. From the manpage:
sync Similar to the mirror function, but
only gets the packages that are cur-
rently installed on your system. It
uses dpkg(8) --get-selections to find
out
on B into a mirror (on B), then burn that
onto a CDROM, carry it to A and install it.
I though that apt-move sync is my freind. From the manpage:
sync Similar to the mirror function, but
only gets the packages that are cur-
rently installed on your
This old topic again...
I'm not really interested in creating a local hierarchy and maintaining
another set of sources on my machines, but I would like a system where
when a I do a dist-upgrade that before fetching the remote package it
first checks another source for the .deb. In other words
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:48:38 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
BTW -- IIRC, someone posted a way to trim /var/cache/apt/archives to the
most current one (or two) versions and purge the rest. Anyone remember
that?
apt-get autotrim
--
paul
Programming without a hex editor is
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 04:12:27PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:48:38 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
BTW -- IIRC, someone posted a way to trim /var/cache/apt/archives to the
most current one (or two) versions and purge the rest. Anyone remember
that?
apt-get
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 12:48:38PM -0800, Bill Moseley said
This old topic again...
I'm not really interested in creating a local hierarchy and maintaining
another set of sources on my machines, but I would like a system where
when a I do a dist-upgrade that before fetching the remote
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:03:42PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 04:12:27PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:48:38 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
BTW -- IIRC, someone posted a way to trim /var/cache/apt/archives
to the most current one (or two) versions
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 10:08:09PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:03:42PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 04:12:27PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:48:38 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
BTW -- IIRC, someone posted a way to trim
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 22:08:09 +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:03:42PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 04:12:27PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:48:38 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
BTW -- IIRC, someone posted a way to trim
Trying to get apt-move to move an apparently unknown package
(libsensors-1debian1) into the partial mirror, I've created a file,
/mirrors/debian/.apt-move/testing.binary.local containing this line:
libsensors-1debian1 optional main/l/lm-sensors-
The docs seem pretty thin
that I would be able to use as an apt source for future
installations of debian using ' apt-move update '
It seems to process fine, but
when I try to use it as a mirror, either by file:// or http:// (with apache
configured), It tells me the index files are missing, and the mirror is not
used
James Vahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to get apt-move to move an apparently unknown package
(libsensors-1debian1) into the partial mirror, I've created a file,
/mirrors/debian/.apt-move/testing.binary.local containing this line:
libsensors-1debian1 optional main/l/lm-sensors
Am 2003-10-17 15:15:08, schrieb Stefan Wolber:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a problem with apt-move. I use it to bring all the deb packages that I
downloaded on my main machine in a form that other machines that are not
connected via a network can use them.
After apt
/apache_1.3.28-1_i386.deb
apt-move seems more involved than I need -- after all I can still just
use my old way to scp the .debs to where I need them. And I don't
really want to setup a mirror, just a cache.
Of course apt-move seems to have some nice features, such as only .debs
of installed packages
to
/var/cache/apt/archives and have apt-get check there first before
fetching the package.
For example, before fetching apache_1.3.28-1_i386.deb from a source
listed in my sources.list, it first tries something like:
http://somelocalmachine/debian/apache_1.3.28-1_i386.deb
apt-move seems
Albert Dengg wrote:
Hi
well...
you could set up apt-proxy (apt-proxy.sf.net)...
just be aware that it has sometimes painfully long waiting times but otherwise it
works for me
Actually, you can just apt-get install apt-proxy. It is reasonably
easy to setup.
-Roberto
pgp0.pgp
Description:
Hi,
I try to maintain a partial mirror of unstable but I have a problem
with apt-move, mainly it's a bit too efficient.
apt-move update (as root) will build a repository in
/mnt/data/mirrors/debian but then delete _all_ the debs it copied over.
Also, it won't build Packages.gz or Release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 20 July 2003 02:22 pm, Patrick Albuquerque wrote:
Hi,
I try to maintain a partial mirror of unstable but I have a problem
with apt-move, mainly it's a bit too efficient.
apt-move update (as root) will build a repository in
/mnt/data
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 17:22:03 -0500
Patrick Albuquerque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I try to maintain a partial mirror of unstable but I have a problem
with apt-move, mainly it's a bit too efficient.
apt-move update (as root) will build a repository in
/mnt/data/mirrors/debian
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 04:24:57PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 20 July 2003 02:22 pm, Patrick Albuquerque wrote:
Hi,
I try to maintain a partial mirror of unstable but I have a problem
with apt-move, mainly it's a bit too
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:31:32PM -0400, Kevin McKinley wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 17:22:03 -0500
Patrick Albuquerque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I try to maintain a partial mirror of unstable but I have a problem
with apt-move, mainly it's a bit too efficient.
apt-move update
Hallo,
nachdem ich ja einen eigenen localen Debian-Server habe (und nicht
genug platz auf der Platte), habe ich den unvollstaendigen Mirror
von WOODY gekillt und einen mit apt-move erstellt... ;-))
Das ganze von allen derzeit 23 Computern. Also der Plattenplatz hat
sich dramatisch reduziert
distributions (Woody). All I needed was
similar CDs of the security updates. Unfortunately, CD images of the
security updates were not to be found anywhere, so I decided to make
them myself, somehow, and burn them.
I know from the Securing Debian HOWTO, and elsewhere, that one can use
apt-move
for using apt-move to make the CD images of
the security updates distribution.
If you want to locally mirror security updates, I suggest either an FTP
mirror application or rsync.
5. Directions to a detailed description of Debian's distributions
scheme, showing the meaning/rationale
I have a really silly question for all you apt-move users out there. Is
there a way to syncronize a testing box to unstable? For instance, I have
a testing box and I want to build an unstable archive as well as a testing
archive. I already have a testing archive syncronized on a nightly basis
hi,
have you considered the debmirror package?
--sean
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:18:43AM -0500, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
I have a really silly question for all you apt-move users out there. Is
there a way to syncronize a testing box to unstable? For instance, I have
a testing box and I
Nov 2002, sean finney wrote:
hi,
have you considered the debmirror package?
--sean
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:18:43AM -0500, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
I have a really silly question for all you apt-move users out there. Is
there a way to syncronize a testing box to unstable
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 06:50, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
This package may work, however I only want to mirror the packages that are
installed on my server, nothing else.
Have you looked at apt-proxy? Works very nicely here.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi. I just did an upgrade and found myself with a new version of
apt-move with incompatible changes from previous versions.
I did an apt-move fsck and then an apt-moveget which worked ok. When
I tried an apt-move move it skipped a number of packages including
the newest samba packages which I
Buenos días por la mañana! :-)
Tengo una duda sobre apt-move.
Yo uso debmirror para hacer un mirror de Sid. Pero me actualizo todos
los días, y mi mirror tiene los paquetes del día anterior. Por lo tanto
en /var/cache/apt/archives suele haber tesoritos que incorporo al mirror
con apt-move, para
Andreas Metzler schrieb:
keines dieser komplexen, hie und da durch Sicherheitsprobleme
auffallenden Schwergewichte verwenden und stattdessen zu vsftpd,
twoftpd, publicfile oder eventuell auch bsd-ftpd greifen.
Kenne die alle nicht - und was der Bauer nicht kennt, kann er im
Zweifel auch
Rainer Ellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler schrieb:
keines dieser komplexen, hie und da durch Sicherheitsprobleme
auffallenden Schwergewichte verwenden und stattdessen zu vsftpd,
twoftpd, publicfile oder eventuell auch bsd-ftpd greifen.
Kenne die alle nicht - und was der Bauer
Ihr Lieben,
hat eigentlich schon jemand von euch einen workarround für den apt-move
BUG #156817 ?
Ich habe schon wie dort empfohlen dpkg dpkg-dev apt-move wieder auf
stable zurückgefahren, aber schiebt apt-move die runtergeladenen Pakete
nur in den mirror, um sie dann gleich wieder zu löschen
einer apt-move Konfiguration nur einen
einzigen Zweig verwalten. Lief es denn mal richtig? Sind die zu
spiegelnden Sites definiert, ist der apt-move Baum als file:// in der
sources.list? Ein wenig verstehbare Info wär nicht schlecht.
Vermutlich nimmst Du besser direkt das neueste apt-proxy. Das
mirror nach unstable
schiebt.
Hää?? - kannitverstan!!
Soweit ich weiss, kann man mit einer apt-move Konfiguration nur einen
einzigen Zweig verwalten.
Danke, das war die Info die mir fehlte!
Lief es denn mal richtig?
Nein, aber ich habs nicht gemerkt, da ich faktisch eh nur Pakete aus
Klaus-M. Klingsporn schrieb:
Vermutlich nimmst Du besser direkt das neueste apt-proxy. Das ist
geeigneter um mehrere Zweige zu spiegeln.
Ich werd's mir mal ansehen!
Für mehrere Zweige parallel definitiv die bessere Lösung. Am Anfang am
besten die Timeouts auskommentieren und MAX_VERSIONS
Hello,
How can I create Release ans Packages file with apt-move result tree ?
This seems to be requied for debootstrap !
François
--
Woody 3.0
Linux tanna 2.4.14 #3 SMP Thu Dec 6 14:04:03 CET 2001 i686 unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Bonjour/soir maintenant,
en explorant apt-move et faisant par hasard un find sur la
hiérachie obtenue, j'ai cru voir que les paquets (pas tous?)
était stockés en double. Une fois sous archi 386, une autre sous
all(binary-...)
est-ce que
* j'ai la berlue
* je sais pas utiliser apt-move
* j'ai
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:51:36PM +0200, georges mariano wrote:
Bonjour/soir maintenant,
en explorant apt-move et faisant par hasard un find sur la
hiérachie obtenue, j'ai cru voir que les paquets (pas tous?)
était stockés en double. Une fois sous archi 386, une autre sous
all(binary
Hi Goran
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:18:16AM +0100, Goran Ristic wrote:
Dieses nette kleine Ding erzeugt aber lediglich einen lokalen mirror der
in /v/c/a/a liegenden Pakete. apt-proxy such aber auch dem Bereich pool
heraus.
Hat da jemand einen Lösungsvorschlag?
Ja, apt-proxy-import macht
away the existing
copy (on the grounds that I didn't have anything to lose) and rerunning
`dselect update', which recreated it correctly. What's going on here?
Not sure. Did you originally create your local mirror with apt-move 3.x
(potato version) ? Are you now using 4.x (woody version) ? If so
again about an hour ago, but I recovered by blowing away the existing
copy (on the grounds that I didn't have anything to lose) and rerunning
`dselect update', which recreated it correctly. What's going on here?
Not sure. Did you originally create your local mirror with apt-move
3.x
I have successfully created a local mirror moved the packages from the
apt/archive to the local mirror using apt-move (nice tool). I would now
like to populate it with more packages. I have 8 of the woody iso's and
would like to somehow get the packages directly from these as opposed to
using
C. Madden wrote:
I have successfully created a local mirror moved the packages from the
apt/archive to the local mirror using apt-move (nice tool). I would now
like to populate it with more packages. I have 8 of the woody iso's and
would like to somehow get the packages directly from
Richard Cobbe wrote:
I've added the local mirror to sources.list, but neither apt-get nor
dselect appears to see these files. What step have I missed?
It's a simple typo. Change deb file:///home... to deb file://home...
BTW when I reply to your message only part of it shows up in my mailer.
slashes are in fact correct. Turns out you have to write
the Release files by hand. (I have to say, I do wish this part of the
process were documented better---if not necessarily in the apt-move
manpage, then at least in /usr/share/doc/apt-move. It looks like there
are already some bug reports
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
