Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-23 Thread Katipo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 17, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote: * Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem with these "kept back" packages? Thanks! Which packages are you referring to

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-23 Thread Katipo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 17, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote: * Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem with these "kept back" packages? Thanks! Which packages are you referring to

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-22 Thread ms419
On Oct 17, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote: * Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem with these "kept back" packages? Thanks! Which packages are you referring to exactly? Regards, The li

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back

2004-10-22 Thread rds
--- rds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The thing is I install all my packages using aptitude. If I use apt-get, I > believe the aptitude database will be out of synch and I'd like to avoid > that. > > I tried "aptitude dist-upgrade bind9 dnsutils --simulate" but that offers me > to > install 626 NE

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back

2004-10-21 Thread rds
--- robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try apt-get install one of the packages and check the output. > Robin The thing is I install all my packages using aptitude. If I use apt-get, I believe the aptitude database will be out of synch and I'd like to avoid that. I tried "aptitude dist-upgrade bin

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back

2004-10-20 Thread ms linux
rds wrote: > Hi, > > Ran "aptitude upgrade --show-versions" today and got the following. Can anyone > shed some light on why these packages are kept back? And what should I do about > it (I'd like to keep the system in synch with testing)? > > Thanks in advance > >

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back

2004-10-20 Thread robin
rds wrote: Hi, Ran "aptitude upgrade --show-versions" today and got the following. Can anyone shed some light on why these packages are kept back? And what should I do about it (I'd like to keep the system in synch with testing)? Thanks in advance -- Checking

aptitude: packages have been kept back

2004-10-20 Thread rds
Hi, Ran "aptitude upgrade --show-versions" today and got the following. Can anyone shed some light on why these packages are kept back? And what should I do about it (I'd like to keep the system in synch with testing)? Thanks in advance -- Checking if the

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-17 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem > >with these "kept back" packages? > > > >Thanks! > > > Which packages are you referring to exactly? > Regards, This seems to be a new featu

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-16 Thread Katipo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem with these "kept back" packages? Thanks! Which packages are you referring to exactly? Regards, David. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-16 Thread j64669
On (16/10/04 16:05), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back? > Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:05:35 -0700 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME > au

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-16 Thread ms419
On Oct 7, 2004, at 3:59 AM, robin wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or how I might find out? I guess what I'd like to know is how to get more information about why aptitude is concluding that these couple packages should be "kep

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-07 Thread robin
Brian Pack wrote: On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or how I might find out?

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-06 Thread Brian Pack
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or > >> how I might find out? > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-06 Thread ms419
On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or how I might find out? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=aptitude Enjoy. Thanks for the tip, Thomas, but did you mean this problem has alr

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-02 Thread Thomas Adam
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or > how I might find out? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=aptitude Enjoy. -- Thomas Adam = "The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- http://linuxgazette.net "TAG Editor"

aptitude: packages have been kept back?

2004-10-01 Thread ms419
I'm a long time apt-get user, trying to make sense of aptitude. I really like aptitude's automatic dependancy tracking; but it keeps "keeping packages back" whenever I run "aptitude dist-upgrade". "apt-get dist-upgrade" doesn't keep packages back. Examining these "kept back" packages in aptitude