On Vi, 19 oct 12, 08:05:46, Kelly Clowers wrote:
Oh well. I mean obviously people are free to use what they want, I
just cannot understand why anyone would use apt-* when there is
aptitude. And 90% of the time I use interactive mode, which doesn't
exist *at all* in apt-*, and when I do use
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:05:55AM -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
I recommend using aptitude for everything. It replaces apt-get and
apt-cache, ...
root@tal:~# dpkg -S /usr/bin/apt-get
apt: /usr/bin/apt-get
root@tal:~# apt-cache policy aptitude
aptitude:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.6.8.1-2
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:05:55AM -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
I recommend using aptitude for everything. It replaces apt-get and
apt-cache, ...
root@tal:~# dpkg -S /usr/bin/apt-get
apt: /usr/bin/apt-get
On Friday 19 October 2012 16:05:46 Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:05:55AM -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
I recommend using aptitude for everything. It replaces apt-get and
apt-cache, ...
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 19 October 2012 16:05:46 Kelly Clowers wrote:
I swear I saw it on the Aptitude page on the Debian wiki, but I guess
it was somewhere else, because I just looked and it is not.
I swear I _saw_ it - past tense!
5 matches
Mail list logo