Re: automount - gnome-volume-manager vs. nautilus

2010-02-08 Thread Wincent
I use xface4 (locale is zh_CN.UTF-8), thunar-volman automount portable disk. However, when it mounts, it doesn't take care of encoding. Thus, all the files with non-English (e.g. Chinese) characters don't show correctly. How can I solve this issue? Thanks. Well, if it works, why not. It should

automount - gnome-volume-manager vs. nautilus

2009-06-10 Thread Wolodja Wentland
Hi all, I have been using gnome-volume-manager to automount USB/CD/.. media but that no longer works for me. I am *not* running GNOME, but some GNOME related daemons and it seems like I have been bitten by the solutions for bug #507630 [1] and #507630 [2]. The situation with g-v-m and

Re: automount - gnome-volume-manager vs. nautilus

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Wolodja Wentland wrote: Hi all, I have been using gnome-volume-manager to automount USB/CD/.. media but that no longer works for me. I am *not* running GNOME, but some GNOME related Does anybody have good suggestions? What kind of desktop environment are you running? If you need a

Re: automount - gnome-volume-manager vs. nautilus

2009-06-10 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Wolodja Wentland wrote: Hi all, I have been using gnome-volume-manager to automount USB/CD/.. media but that no longer works for me. I am *not* running GNOME, but some GNOME related Does anybody have good suggestions?

Re: automount - gnome-volume-manager vs. nautilus

2009-06-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Wolodja Wentland wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Wolodja Wentland wrote: Hi all, I have been using gnome-volume-manager to automount USB/CD/.. media but that no longer works for me. I am *not* running GNOME, but some GNOME related Does anybody have good

Re: automount - gnome-volume-manager vs. nautilus

2009-06-10 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:54 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: It seems like ivman is orphaned [1], so i don't think it is a good alternative. Well, if it works, why not. It should probably have been titled as RFA. Unfortunately it does not work. I see the behaviour described in bug #521325