I have upgraded from 1.3.1 to hamm with some difficulty, but feel like
I'm getting there. My latest problem is that when invoking emacs from a
console, I get segmentation fault, and no emacs.
I don't believe that emacs was upgraded during the deselect process so I
suspect that the version I
I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
packages that are headed as obsolete, one being emacs. Does this mean
what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded
around it and now it needs upgrading too? Probobly.
There are some other packages
i had the same thing happen and i had selected to upgrade emacs to
20.xx...made a mess. it was the only really broken package.
had been wanting to check out xemacs so ended up purging emacs and
installing xemacs-20.whatever and like it. anyway, suspect you will need
to purge emacs and do a
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
packages that are headed as obsolete, one being emacs. Does this mean
what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded
around it and now it needs upgrading
, July 08, 1998 9:01 AM
To: Edward J. Young
Cc: debian list
Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
packages that are headed as obsolete, one being emacs
Young, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, I'm still confused...
Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming.
There are now *four* emacsen in hamm: emacs-19.34, emacs-20.2,
xemacs-19.16, and xemacs-20.4, and you need to choose which you want.
The emacs package is obsolete
as it will coexist with GNU Emacs.
Any comments or caveats or experiences here?
My priorities:
Emacs (of some variety)
X
AX25Utils.
I also need to be able to compile and do some code development.
Thanx,
Ed
Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
Young, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Young, Ed wrote:
Ok, I'm still confused...
Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming.
No, that's not what I meant. IIRC, there was once emacs and now
there are emacs19 and emacs20 and no plain emacs. If you have a bo
emacs package, you
Young, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanx for the fast replies.
I'd like to have two emacsen if possible or one that will fit the bill for
both purposes. The machine I'm working on upgrading is going to be an
experimental Amateur radio packet machine and is somewhat minimalist. (486
dx66
9 matches
Mail list logo
