Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-08 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 08 March 2016 10:07:35 Haines Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:46:14PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > > It sounds as though your Jessie is being identified as Wheezy. > > > > > You get that warning with Wheezy, even if it is 64bit Wheezy > > > > > with 64bit Google-Chrome.

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-08 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Tuesday 08 March 2016 15:07:35 Haines Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:46:14PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > > It sounds as though your Jessie is being identified as Wheezy. > > > > > You get that warning with Wheezy, even if it is 64bit Wheezy > > > > > with 64bit Google-Chrome.

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-08 Thread Haines Brown
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:46:14PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > It sounds as though your Jessie is being identified as Wheezy. > > > > You get that warning with Wheezy, even if it is 64bit Wheezy > > > > with 64bit Google-Chrome. Presumably because Google hasn't > > > > written a string of

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-08 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 07 March 2016 18:29:50 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 07 March 2016 17:14:40 Haines Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:54:22PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Monday 07 March 2016 00:30:44 Haines Brown wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:43:56PM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-07 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 07 March 2016 17:14:40 Haines Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:54:22PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Monday 07 March 2016 00:30:44 Haines Brown wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:43:56PM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > > > Correct syntax is: > > > > > > > > -- > > > >

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-07 Thread Haines Brown
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:54:22PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 07 March 2016 00:30:44 Haines Brown wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:43:56PM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > > Correct syntax is: > > > > > > -- > > > deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-07 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 07 March 2016 00:30:44 Haines Brown wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:43:56PM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > Correct syntax is: > > > > -- > > deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main > > -- > > > > On 6 March 2016 at 20:10, Haines Brown

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-06 Thread Haines Brown
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:43:56PM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > Correct syntax is: > > -- > deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main > -- > > On 6 March 2016 at 20:10, Haines Brown wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:47:26PM +0300, Reco

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-06 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Correct syntax is: -- deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main -- On 6 March 2016 at 20:10, Haines Brown wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:47:26PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 14:34:25 -0500 > > Haines Brown

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-06 Thread Haines Brown
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:47:26PM +0300, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 14:34:25 -0500 > Haines Brown wrote: > > > I have jessie installed on an AMD64 machine, which lacks any desktop > > environment. > > > > I downloaded google-chrome AMD64 deb from the

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-06 Thread Sven Hartge
Reco wrote: > 1) Locate the line like this in a file inside /etc/apt/sources.list.d: > deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ > 2) Change it to: > deb [amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ > This warning should go away. This will only be a temporary fix

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-06 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 14:34:25 -0500 Haines Brown wrote: > I have jessie installed on an AMD64 machine, which lacks any desktop > environment. > > I downloaded google-chrome AMD64 deb from the Chrome website and > installed by running dpkg -i on it. It works OK.

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-06 Thread Sven Hartge
Haines Brown wrote: > I have jessie installed on an AMD64 machine, which lacks any desktop > environment. > I downloaded google-chrome AMD64 deb from the Chrome website and > installed by running dpkg -i on it. It works OK. But now I want to add > flashplugin-nonfree for it

binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

2016-03-06 Thread Haines Brown
I have jessie installed on an AMD64 machine, which lacks any desktop environment. I downloaded google-chrome AMD64 deb from the Chrome website and installed by running dpkg -i on it. It works OK. But now I want to add flashplugin-nonfree for it or, if that fails to use it for my iceweasel. In