Andrew wrote:
Something must have gone wrong because the system now complains about
unresoloved symboles after the phrase calculating module
dependancies.
This often happens - did you rm all the old modules first?
I know this is a little risky, so you probably should take the system
I had written:
Even more badly, I mv'd all modules in /lib to my ~/ directory
expecting the OS still to work assuming all relevant OS routines are
located in RAM. Bad idea - no 'cp', no 'mv' , no nothing, the system
is completely useless. I guess if I'm not able to get a small linux
system
Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote:
make clean
make oldconfig dep bzImage
and bzImage is in arch/i386/boot/bzImage.
How exactly did you try to build your kernel? Did you get any error
message?
The kernel build process has nothing to do with Debian or any other
distribution. It just needs
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
make bzImage helped to create arch/i386/boot/bzImage as you stated.
I used before make zImage which in fact had put the file in
arch/i386/boot/compressed/. So the size of about 0.6MB is valid. I was
just wondering because the 2.0.38 kernel I recently
However, if you use make-kpkg to create your kernel package, you
should find the *.deb file in the parent directory to the linux
source.
Good Luck!
Oh my dear - what has happened!
I thought the inquiry was very clear, this has nothing to do with
package installing!
Of course I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Of course I installed all neccessary src's, how would I've launched
make xconfig without doing this first?
Nobody said otherwise.
The kernel compiled without any errors - but which file is the
Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Of course I installed all neccessary src's, how would I've launched
make xconfig without doing this first?
Nobody said otherwise.
The kernel compiled without any errors - but which file is the correct
one?
Hai Robert Wilhelm,
I think we have a communication problem here, so let's at both sides
try to be more explicit and maybe a little more informative:)
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:18:26PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
...
Ok, I think I got it. Debian seems to provide a combined
Carel Fellinger wrote:
Hai Robert Wilhelm,
I think we have a communication problem here, so let's at both sides
try to be more explicit and maybe a little more informative:)
Thanks for your patience, Carel.
No, it is a three step process.
0) get the kernel source and apply all the
robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
[...]
As far as I'm concerned most distributions and README's recommend to
create a linux/ dir as a sub of src/ and I did so.
In the end this makes up:
/usr/src/linux/kernel-source-2.2.17/arch/i386/boot
- after x-tar'ing the kernet-sourcexx.tar.gz. Usually you
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 06:11:30PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Carel Fellinger wrote:
No, it is a three step process.
0) get the kernel source and apply all the necessary patches
1a) configure the kernel
1b) and compile the kernel
1c) and build a deb file from it clearing the
brian moore wrote:
Thats a nice and short explaination - thank you very much! I guess 2a
includes make modules_install and mv's the system.map to the
appropiate place?
Yes, it does.
Just got a message from another deb user - it didn't.
and I would really like to understand why the
Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote:
robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
[...]
As far as I'm concerned most distributions and README's recommend to
create a linux/ dir as a sub of src/ and I did so.
In the end this makes up:
/usr/src/linux/kernel-source-2.2.17/arch/i386/boot
- after x-tar'ing
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:00:18PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
brian moore wrote:
Thats a nice and short explaination - thank you very much! I guess 2a
includes make modules_install and mv's the system.map to the
appropiate place?
Yes, it does.
Just got a message from
robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote:
[...]
A small example of what you call masochistic:
cd /usr/src/linux-2.2.18pre18
make config|menuconfig|xconfig
make-kpkg --revision 9:blabla kernel_image
dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.2.18pre18_blabla*.deb
If you keep up
Just rebuilt my first 2.2.17 kernel, unfortunatly I'm not able to find
the kernelimage(!)
The readme reports to look at /usr/src/././arch/i386/boot/ but _this_
zImage is a binary only of 25xx bytes!
There's one vmlinux at /usr/src/././arch/i386/boot/compressed/ in
0.6MB size - quite contrary to
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:05:33PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
Just rebuilt my first 2.2.17 kernel, unfortunatly I'm not able to
find the kernelimage(!)
OK. This is my second version of my reply email. I had to get my
brain goalie back on the ice before I said something nasty. ;-) My
17 matches
Mail list logo
