-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:35:02AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Shoot the maintainer of xcdroast an email asking him about the issue,
or open a wishlist bug.
Submitted wishlist bug against xcdroast.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:42:17AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
Using a setuid root program (sudo) to avoid having cdrecord or cdrdao set up
as setuid root just does not any sense to me at all.
Well, sudo can be used as a means of authentication to
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:42:17AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
Using a setuid root program (sudo) to avoid having cdrecord or cdrdao set
up as setuid root just does not any sense to me at all.
Well, sudo can be used as a means of authentication to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:20:42AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
The point is that cdrdao requires root priveledge to run, period
No, I meant I don't understand why someone would protect cdrao with sudo...
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae [EMAIL
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:41:29PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
permissions
Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
permissions or something like that I should be able to control which
Here is the way Debian installs cdrecord
-rws--x---1 root cdrom177k Apr 9 2002 /usr/bin/cdrecord
The package I see in unstable installs as -rwsr-xr-- if you're running
setuid, which is much more sensible (there's a comment in the Debian
policy manual noting that there's
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:24:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
setuid. Afaik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
command line since xcdroast will do it all in one shot for me.
- --
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:23:59AM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
Sudo is a solution.
Well, that way a user that can run cdrdao can run basically everything,
can't he?
No. By sudo you can limit the user to run a specific program, even with
specific options.
In that case sudo might be worth looking into and I will do just that, :-)
David
--
To
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:24:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
setuid. Afaik
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:07:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
command line since xcdroast will do it all in one
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:07:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
command line since xcdroast will do
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:59, Qian Gong wrote:
Sudo is a solution.
Well, that way a user that can run cdrdao can run basically everything,
can't he?
No. By sudo you can limit the user to run a specific program, even with
specific options.
sudo is a setuid program, it needs to be to do
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:56, David Fokkema wrote:
I think you might need to setuid cdrdao
hth
Bob
If there is any other way, I'd rather not do that, :-)
I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody
I think you might need to setuid cdrdao
hth
Bob
If there is any other way, I'd rather not do that, :-)
I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
setuid. Afaik that is
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:22, David Fokkema wrote:
Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
permissions or something
Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
permissions or something like that I should be able to control which
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:17:45AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:22, David Fokkema wrote:
Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
cdrdao to run without setuid.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
setuid. Afaik that is because it
Hi,
I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
cdrdao scanbus
should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
up as normal, everything works fine. The problem is that I don't get it to
work for a
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:07, David Fokkema wrote:
Hi,
I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
cdrdao scanbus
should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
up as normal, everything works
Hi,
I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
cdrdao scanbus
should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
up as normal, everything works fine. The problem is that I don't get it
24 matches
Mail list logo
