On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
D G Teed:
It is finicky. I played with various repo sources and once did
see clamav package group appear as possible. I said 'n' to abort
because I wanted to understand exactly where the package was
coming from.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:25:07 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de
wrote:
You can use 'apt-cache policy $package' to see which source apt chooses
for a given package.
Thanks for that tip.
I waited for awhile to see how this worked
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:25:07 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
Version table:
0.97.1+dfsg-1~squeeze1 0
500 http://mirror.its.dal.ca/debian/ squeeze-updates/main amd64
Packages
*** 0.97+dfsg-2~squeeze1 0
Back to the initial topic...
I did get an updated clamav yesterday on my home system.
Checking at work with the same repos (except Debian multimedia)
I don't see updates to clamav packages as of 14:58:23 UTC 2011.
0.97.1+dfsg-1~squeeze1 is the package version I have at home.
The site :
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:04:33 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
Back to the initial topic...
I did get an updated clamav yesterday on my home system.
Yes, it was announced some days ago:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce/2011/07/msg0.html
(they're also coming to oldstable)
Checking
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Packages are in there:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/clamav/?C=M;O=D
Did you refresh your repos (apt-get update)?
It is finicky. I played with various repo sources and once did
see clamav package group appear
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:11:55 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Packages are in there:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/clamav/?C=M;O=D
Did you refresh your repos (apt-get update)?
It is finicky. I played with various repo
D G Teed:
It is finicky. I played with various repo sources and once did
see clamav package group appear as possible. I said 'n' to abort
because I wanted to understand exactly where the package was
coming from.
You can use 'apt-cache policy $package' to see which source apt chooses
for
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:02:18 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
I prefer installing from scratch, in-site upgrades is something I avoid
as much as I can :-)
Forget your experiences with SuSE. This is Debian. :)
True is last time I did a zypper dup to upgrade to the next upper
version
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:07:23 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
I will try to keep lenny until reaches its end of life, which should
happen when wheezy comes out.
NACK. Security support for stable releases ends one year after stable+1:
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#lifespan
Camaleón:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:07:23 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
NACK. Security support for stable releases ends one year after stable+1:
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#lifespan
Lenny will reach its EOL in January 2012.
Hey, but that was not my understanding for lenny. I know
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:04:28 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
(...)
Lenny will reach its EOL in January 2012.
Hey, but that was not my understanding for lenny. I know that was how
it used to be but now aren't we based on a 2-year of release fixed
cycle? :-?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:04:28 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
(...)
Lenny will reach its EOL in January 2012.
Hey, but that was not my understanding for lenny. I know that was how
it used to be but now aren't
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:18:15 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
(please, avoid using html formatted e-mails)
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
I can only speculate about this, but I don't think this announcement
is relevant any more. The document is from July
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:59:44AM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:51:28 -0700, Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:46:32PM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Note you don't need to use squeeze-updates, so we are opting into
something which can be a little more
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:52:35PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:04:28 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Camaleón:
(...)
Lenny will reach its EOL in January 2012.
Hey, but that was not my understanding for lenny. I know that was how
it used to be but now aren't we
Camaleón:
I prefer installing from scratch, in-site upgrades is something I avoid
as much as I can :-)
Forget your experiences with SuSE. This is Debian. :)
(Disclaimer: I am still running one lenny system as well, but that's
mostly because I need to prod my hosting provider to install a
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:51:28 -0700, Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:46:32PM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Note you don't need to use squeeze-updates, so we are opting into
something which can be a little more bleeding edge.
Please, note that we are not talking about clamav
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still with lenny (now oldstable) but I was even told that not all
security flaws reached votatile, just some, depending of the nature of
the flaw...
And again, if this policy has recently changed is more than very
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:54:23 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still with lenny (now oldstable) but I was even told that not all
security flaws reached votatile, just some, depending of the nature of
the flaw...
And again, if
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:44:26 -0400, Andrew Reid wrote:
(...)
ClamAV is the archetypical example for this, but given the recent
announcements, I wonder if iceweasel might find itself in this channel
also
+1
I suggested the same time ago.
But now there is:
http://mozilla.debian.net/
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:54:23 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
The statement for squeeze-updates repo purpose makes it very clear it
isn't for security:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/2011/msg0.html
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:14:33 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:54:23 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
The statement for squeeze-updates repo purpose makes it very clear it
isn't for security:
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 19:05:50 Camaleón wrote:
I will try to keep lenny until reaches its end of life, which should
happen when wheezy comes out.
+1
Now I feel old.
I _am_ old. ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Camaleón:
I will try to keep lenny until reaches its end of life, which should
happen when wheezy comes out.
NACK. Security support for stable releases ends one year after stable+1:
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#lifespan
Lenny will reach its EOL in January 2012.
Now I feel old.
I
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:07:23AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
I feel old because squeeze is the fifth Debian release I have used. 8-)
Whippersnapper :)
The first Debian I started using properly was Bo. Until then I was a
Slackware user, but first experienced Debian in its Buzz incarnation.
Hi list,
In my understanding, the stable-updates repo was esthablished in order to
replace the volatile repo. Thus, updated clamav should be pushed in it, but
I note it's only available in the testing branch.
Did I misunderstood the role of the stable-updates repo, or is clam 0.97.1
just coming
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Eric Viseur eric.vis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
In my understanding, the stable-updates repo was esthablished in order to
replace the volatile repo. Thus, updated clamav should be pushed in it, but
I note it's only available in the testing branch.
Did I
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:43 +0200, Eric Viseur wrote:
In my understanding, the stable-updates repo was esthablished in order
to replace the volatile repo. Thus, updated clamav should be pushed in
it, but I note it's only available in the testing branch. Did I
misunderstood the role of the
Hi,
Thanks for the answers. I know the DB still gets updated, but when you're
in charge of almost 20 servers, each beginning to cry like babies at every
little problem, things like this can get pretty annoying.
Guess I'll have to wait till the release on squeeze-updates.
Eric
2011/6/27
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:56:53 +0200, Eric Viseur wrote:
2011/6/27 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
(...)
... for the stable/olstable branch is my understanding that only
security bugfixes are corrected, so if the clamav update does not
closes any serious flaw you will keep seeing the clamav
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:43 +0200, Eric Viseur wrote:
In my understanding, the stable-updates repo was esthablished in order
to replace the volatile repo. Thus, updated clamav should be pushed in
it, but I note it's
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:07:28 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:43 +0200, Eric Viseur wrote:
(...)
I have a server complaining about clam not being up to date every
night, so it's getting a little
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:46:32PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:07:28 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:43 +0200, Eric Viseur wrote:
(...)
I have a server complaining about clam
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:46:32PM +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:07:28 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:58:43 +0200, Eric Viseur wrote:
(...)
I have a server complaining about clam
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:07:28 -0300, D G Teed wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, squeeze-updates is the new volatile, nothing has changed.
Our expectations for squeeze-updates to release clamav ahead of stable
merely to be current are
36 matches
Mail list logo
