>> "ifconfig" can not handle multiple IPv4 addresses on one interface
>and
>> needs this kind of crutch.
>>
>> The far more modern command "ip" has no such limitations.
>
>I've found my own brain to have a similar limitation, and find
>interface
>aliases useful for clarity even when I have ip(8)
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:10:16PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Worth noting: the interface:alias notation was introduced because
> "ifconfig" can not handle multiple IPv4 addresses on one interface and
> needs this kind of crutch.
>
> The far more modern command "ip" has no such limitations.
I'v
Dominik George wrote:
>> I need to know that what is the difference b/w eth1.0101 and eth:1.
>> actually i need to know what is the main difference in "." and ":".
>> any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
> : denotes an alias (second address on same interface), . denotes a VLAN, and
> eth:
sorry what i meant is eth1:1 sorry my mistake.
but thanks for the clarification.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan
wrote:
> sorry what i meant is eth1:1 sorry my mistake.
> but thanks for the clarification.
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Pascal Hambourg
> wrote:
>
>>
Le 04/03/2017 à 18:40, Dominik George a écrit :
eth:1 is nonsense.
Why ? There could be an interface named "eth".
Hi,
>I need to know that what is the difference b/w eth1.0101 and eth:1.
>actually i need to know what is the main difference in "." and ":".
>any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
: denotes an alias (second address on same interface), . denotes a VLAN, and
eth:1 is nonsense.
Cheers,
Nik
Hi All,
I need to know that what is the difference b/w eth1.0101 and eth:1.
actually i need to know what is the main difference in "." and ":".
any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Yousuf
7 matches
Mail list logo
