On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 12:29:30PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
If you're really hard core about security and encryption (and I'm going
to be heretical here, but hey, I have to plug my home), try OpenBSD.
Since it's main repository is in Canada, US crypto laws don't apply. I
played with it
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
locally compiled
Title: RE: crypto patch
snip
hesitant to put it in by default. Who knows, maybe some other
distirbution does? Bastille Linux?
[Andrew Weiss]
So would you run this OS on a headless server? :-)
Epitaph for Bill Gates: This man performed an illegal operation and was shut down --BBC
SGI
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 12:29:30PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
If you're really hard core about security and encryption (and I'm going
to be heretical here, but hey, I have to plug my home), try OpenBSD.
Since it's main repository is in Canada, US crypto laws don't apply. I
played with it
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get
--compile source packagename'. if you haven't used it before
here's how it works :)
with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
locally compiled
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 02:02:35AM -0400, Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get
--compile source packagename'. if you haven't used it before
here's how it works :)
with
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
locally compiled
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 01:25:15AM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
with the annoying side
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
I guess ultimately, what would be best, would be to keep track of the
sources that you have installed, so that you know when the sources
have been updated. Or have apt recompile for you.
well i just don't understand why apt thinks it should
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--revision just sets an epoch, which is rather evil since it will
think your package is newwer then ANY upgraded package unless the
upgraded package has an epoch yours.
The --revision flag in kernel-package only makes an epoch if you
explicitly
you have to get the international kernal patch from either
www.kerneli.org, or in the non-US section. Then you have to patch the
kernel and recompile.
with the new mellowing of usa crypto laws, is there any chance that the
international kernel patch could be included in the default debian
Adam == Adam Shand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you have to get the international kernal patch from either
www.kerneli.org, or in the non-US section. Then you have to
patch the kernel and recompile.
with the new mellowing of usa crypto laws, is there any chance
that the
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 10:49:10PM -0400, Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
Adam == Adam Shand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
with the new mellowing of usa crypto laws, is there any chance
that the international kernel patch could be included in the
default debian kernel?
Probably
Probably not. Beside the crypto laws, there is also the DSFG that
debian adheres to, and many of the encryption schemes have patents on
them, thus makeing them non-free, and not in debian by default.
oh yeah, i forgot about that ... still there are some that are patent
unencumbered aren't
that ... still there are some that are
patent unencumbered aren't there?
Yep, there are those that are distributed with the kernel-int patch
that's distributed in non-US. I'm guessing that since the crypto
patch isn't actually part of the actual kernel source, people would be
hesitant to put
Hola~
Rookie question here. I'm trying to setup an encrypted filesystem as per:
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Loopback-Encrypted-Filesystem-HOWTO-3.html
The first step is installing the latest crypto patch. How do I install the
latest crypto patch using apt-get?
My sources.list include
Michael O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rookie question here. I'm trying to setup an encrypted filesystem as per:
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Loopback-Encrypted-Filesystem-HOWTO-3.html
The first step is installing the latest crypto patch. How do I install the
latest crypto patch
Michael == Michael O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hola~ Rookie question here. I'm trying to setup an encrypted
filesystem as per:
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Loopback-Encrypted-Filesystem-HOWTO-3.html
The first step is installing the latest crypto patch. How do I
18 matches
Mail list logo
