Re: debian.org/security is wrong to say what it does

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 09:36:47PM +0100, maxwillb wrote: > December 26, 2021 1:25:30 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater" > wrote: > > > but that doesn't mean that everything marked as vulnerable is still at risk. > Hi maxwillb I've tried to explain what I understand by the security tracker. The

Re: debian.org/security is wrong to say what it does

December 26, 2021 1:25:30 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote: > but that doesn't mean that everything marked as vulnerable is still at risk. I couldn't understand what you meant, and figured you were referring to some extra hardening done by Debian. Did some googling, and apparently, it's the

Re: debian.org/security is wrong to say what it does

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 01:19:53AM +0100, maxwillb wrote: > December 25, 2021 4:16:59 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater" > wrote: > > > So you're raising issues that everyone knows but can't do a great deal > > about given the difficulties > > I hate to be a broken record, but you could edit >

debian.org/security is wrong to say what it does

December 25, 2021 4:16:59 PM CET "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote: > So you're raising issues that everyone knows but can't do a great deal about > given the difficulties I hate to be a broken record, but you could edit https://www.debian.org/security/ so that it does not say "We handle all