Hi all,
one of my servers has experienced degradation in one of its RAID arrays:
root@micro ~ # cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md2 : active raid1 sda3[0]
1424121720 blocks super 1.2 [2/1] [U_]
md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
29295544 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com [2011.09.24.1034
+0200]:
one of my servers has experienced degradation in one of its RAID arrays:
What happened?
root@micro ~ # mdadm --add /dev/md2 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sdb3 as 2: Invalid argument
Does
Hi Milos,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
root@micro ~ # mdadm --add /dev/md2 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sdb3 as 2: Invalid argument
Try like this instead:
mdadm /dev/md2 --add /dev/sdb3
--
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 07:09:57PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi Milos,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
root@micro ~ # mdadm --add /dev/md2 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sdb3 as 2: Invalid argument
Try like this instead:
mdadm /dev/md2 --add /dev/sdb3
root@micro ~ #
also sprach Andrew McGlashan andrew.mcglas...@affinityvision.com.au
[2011.09.24.1109 +0200]:
root@micro ~ # mdadm --add /dev/md2 /dev/sdb3
Try like this instead:
mdadm /dev/md2 --add /dev/sdb3
That's the same to mdadm.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
i never go
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:50:17AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com [2011.09.24.1034
+0200]:
one of my servers has experienced degradation in one of its RAID arrays:
What happened?
I was in the middle of system update via aptitude
Hi,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 07:09:57PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi Milos,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
root@micro ~ # mdadm --add /dev/md2 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sdb3 as 2: Invalid argument
Try like this instead:
mdadm /dev/md2 --add
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:30:01AM +0100, Milos Negovanovic wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:50:17AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com
[2011.09.24.1034 +0200]:
one of my servers has experienced degradation in one of its RAID arrays:
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com [2011.09.24.1130
+0200]:
I was in the middle of system update via aptitude last week, and it
started giving me strange errors that it cant access /dev/sdb3 ... I
suspect these were errors from underlaying RAID array. At about the same
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 07:33:23PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 07:09:57PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi Milos,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
root@micro ~ # mdadm --add /dev/md2 /dev/sdb3
mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/sdb3 as
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com [2011.09.24.1134
+0200]:
For details see host's SYSLOG (default: /var/log/syslog).
And?
Please try to provide all relevant information up front. It takes
a lot of effort of others if we have to pull all information out of
your nose.
--
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com [2011.09.24.1143
+0200]:
Hmmm this line looks suspicious:
/dev/sdb3: LABEL=home UUID=4030e91a-c6fa-4640-81eb-654e2ad8c180
TYPE=ext4
Where is blkid getting its info from? fdisk sees /dev/sdb3 as linux RAID
partition.
From the
Hi Milos,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
root@micro ~ # blkid
Edited the following
/dev/sda3: UUID=9bca8a2b-2283-9bed-c8fe-9f89b0860cb2 LABEL=micro:2 TYPE=linux_raid_member
/dev/sdb3: LABEL=home UUID=4030e91a-c6fa-4640-81eb-654e2ad8c180 TYPE=ext4
root@micro ~ # mdadm --detail --scan
ARRAY
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 08:30:06PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi Milos,
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
root@micro ~ # blkid
Edited the following
/dev/sda3: UUID=9bca8a2b-2283-9bed-c8fe-9f89b0860cb2
LABEL=micro:2 TYPE=linux_raid_member /dev/sdb3: LABEL=home
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com [2011.09.24.1305
+0200]:
If the disk is failing as it appears from the smartctl message ...
then I also concur that you should look at replacing the disk ASAP.
Ill try to fix the RAID first, Ive seen crappy drives going into
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Milos Negovanovic
milos.negovano...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 08:30:06PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
Where is blkid getting its info from? fdisk sees /dev/sdb3 as linux RAID
partition.
I expect blkid gets its
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 01:46:21PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@gmail.com [2011.09.24.1305
+0200]:
If the disk is failing as it appears from the smartctl message ...
then I also concur that you should look at replacing the disk ASAP.
Milos Negovanovic wrote:
Ive dd-ed /dev/sdb3 and that did the trick! I was able to re-add the
partition to RAID array.
Great, but keep an eye on that disk. I would definitely be wanting to
ensure it's integrity ... at the very least make sure you have good
backups. I'm sure you know that
18 matches
Mail list logo