Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

On Lu, 30 mar 20, 12:47:45, Martin wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 20:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > > For my apt preferences I had: > > > > > > Package: * > > > Pin: release a=testing > > > Pin-Priority: 650 > > > > > > Package: * > > > Pin: release a=unstable > > > Pin-Priority: 600 > > > >

Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 20:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > According to your 'apt policy' you also had repositories configured for > Skype and Docker. Did you remove those as well? They remain, just were in their own files. > > > For my apt preferences I had: > > > > Package: * > > Pin: release

Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

On Du, 29 mar 20, 16:40:03, Martin wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 13:33, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > > Pinned packages: > > > libpython3.8-minimal -> 3.8.2-1 with priority -3 > > > libcrypt1 -> 1:4.4.15-1 with priority -3 > > > libcrypt1:i386 -> 1:4.4.15-1 with priority

Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 13:33, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > So you have a multiarch (amd64 and i386) system, with amd64 repositories > for Skype and Docker. > > Why do you need i386? I'm guessing you might have some locally installed > packages as well. Please show also the output of > > aptitude

Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

On Du, 29 mar 20, 12:37:39, Martin wrote: > > Here is apt policy: > > Package files: > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > release a=now > 500 https://repo.skype.com/deb stable/main amd64 Packages > release o=. stable,a=stable,n=stable,l=. stable,c=main,b=amd64 > origin repo.skype.com >

Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

I commented out the testing repository in my apt sources list and ran apt update/upgrade/clean/autoremove. It helped e.g. with updating firefox from 69 to 74 but other packages are still stuck. apt list --upgradable libc-bin/unstable 2.30-4 amd64 [upgradable from: 2.29-2] libc6/unstable 2.30-4

Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

Hello Andrei, thank you for your time! > With this sources list you appear to be running unstable, not testing. > Please show also the output of 'apt policy'. > sorry, yes I am usually happy to be on "unstable". Here is apt policy: Package files: 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status release a=now

Re: Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

On Sb, 28 mar 20, 23:59:17, Martin wrote: > > I have a debian bullseye/testing machine on a 2017 HP i7 machine that > I used daily for many months but was not running since end of November > 2019. I upgraded everything with apt update + dist-upgrade + > autoremove + clean this week. [...] >

Unsolvable dependency problems around libc / libcrypt on debian testing/bullseye

Dear all, I have a debian bullseye/testing machine on a 2017 HP i7 machine that I used daily for many months but was not running since end of November 2019. I upgraded everything with apt update + dist-upgrade + autoremove + clean this week. I can't exactly say how but while everything appeared

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Hi Sven, Thanks for that suggestion. I've quickly tried this on a test VM and indeed crossgrading seems to work much better in debian 9 compared to debian 7. Thanks, Pieter > On 16 Jan 2018, at 16:03, Sven Hartge wrote: > > Pieter Van Isacker

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Hi, On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:58:48 +0100 Pieter Van Isacker wrote: > Hi all, > > While testing change a Debian Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit I ran into an > issue. Following the guide on https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading >

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Sven Hartge wrote: > Still, there is no guarantee it will work and for production systems I > strongly advise you to just backup the data and reinstall from scratch > as 64bit system. +1 copy data (backup) dpkg --get-selections install 64 dpkg --set-selections migrate configurations 90% is

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Pieter Van Isacker wrote: > While testing change a Debian Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit I ran into an > issue. Following the guide on https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading > Once we've change to 64bit we > plan to update to

Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Hi all, While testing change a Debian Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit I ran into an issue. Following the guide on https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading Once we've change to 64bit we plan to update to Debian 8 and then possibly to Debian 9 Changing the kernel

Re: Sid google-earth-stable dependency problems

snip: I also build a deb from make-googleearth-package with following result: I deleted libcurl.so.4 in /opt/google-earth Now it works. Thanks 4 you input! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Sid google-earth-stable dependency problems

and directories currently installed.) Unpacking google-earth-stable (from .../google-earth-stable_current_amd64(1).deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of google-earth-stable: google-earth-stable depends on lsb-core (= 3.2); however: Package lsb-core is not installed. google-earth-stable

Sid google-earth-stable dependency problems

.../google-earth-stable_current_amd64(1).deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of google-earth-stable: google-earth-stable depends on lsb-core (= 3.2); however: Package lsb-core is not installed. google-earth-stable depends on ia32-libs; however: Package ia32-libs is not installed

Re: Sid google-earth-stable dependency problems

The Sunday 28 July 2013 23:14:45, sp113438 wrote : On my Sid system it is not possible to install google-earth. I tried to install the downloaded program from Googles site: Hi What about http://packages.debian.org/sid/googleearth-package Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Sid google-earth-stable dependency problems

On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:45:56 +0200 Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote: The Sunday 28 July 2013 23:14:45, sp113438 wrote : On my Sid system it is not possible to install google-earth. I tried to install the downloaded program from Googles site: Hi What about

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:18:16PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: Hello, On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Xan wrote: I have a NSLU2 device (armel computer). With Debian 5.0.2 installed. I cannot use reportbug because exim4 is not configured properly Use reportbug -o bugreport.txt to

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

(this really isn't Debian-arm specific; please direct follow-ups, if any, to the debian-user mailinglist) On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:11:43PM +0200, Xan wrote: Hi, I have a NSLU2 device (armel computer). With Debian 5.0.2 installed. I cannot use reportbug because exim4 is not configured

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

En/na Wouter Verhelst ha escrit: The issue is that php5 depends on libapache2-mod-php5 | libapache2-mod-php5filter | php5-cgi; i.e., it does allow you to do this, but *by default* will depend on the apache versions. If you wish to use PHP5 with cherokee, you need to explicitly select php5-cgi,

Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

Hi, I have a NSLU2 device (armel computer). With Debian 5.0.2 installed. I cannot use reportbug because exim4 is not configured properly but it's not the story. I have two possible bugs of too much dependencies: 1) When I want to install php5, apt install me apache2 packages. I think

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:11:43PM +0200, Xan wrote: Hi, I have a NSLU2 device (armel computer). With Debian 5.0.2 installed. I cannot use reportbug because exim4 is not configured properly but it's not the story. I have two possible bugs of too much dependencies: 1) When I want

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

On 2009-07-22 18:06 +0200, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:11:43PM +0200, Xan wrote: apt-get install php5 -s look at apt-cache show php5, you will see that it is a meta package that depends on the following: ... Depends: libapache2-mod-php5 (= 5.2.0-8+etch13) |

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

En/na Andrew Sackville-West ha escrit: look at apt-cache show php5, you will see that it is a meta package that depends on the following: ... Depends: libapache2-mod-php5 (= 5.2.0-8+etch13) | libapache-mod-php5 (= 5.2.0-8+etch13) | php5-cgi (= 5.2.0-8+etch13), php5-common (= 5.2.0-8+etch13) ...

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

En/na Sven Joachim ha escrit: Note that if you install them at the same time, you must list php5-cgi _before_ php5 at the command line, because otherwise the apt resolver would still bring in libapache2-mod-php5. See bug #122304¹ and its siblings for details. Sven ¹

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

On Qua, 22 Jul 2009, Xan wrote: Maybe other person could enlight us really c-compiler or subversion are needed? They aren't really needed. $ apt-cache show ikiwiki Package: ikiwiki Priority: optional Section: web Installed-Size: 5880 Maintainer: Joey Hess jo...@debian.org Architecture:

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

Hello, On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Xan wrote: PS: Please, CC always debian-arm list (I'm just only subscribed here) or CCme directly. None of the bugs you describe are specific to the arm architecture so you should really be sending your future reports about this to debian-user and _not_

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

In Debian stable lenny apt automatically installs recommended packages. If you want to select packages manually you can do so using the aptitude front-end or by using apt --no-install-recommends. Regards, Kapil. -- Wow!!. Why that? I previous use debian and apt only install needed

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:05:24PM +0200, Xan wrote: In Debian stable lenny apt automatically installs recommended packages. If you want to select packages manually you can do so using the aptitude front-end or by using apt --no-install-recommends. Wow!!. Why that? I previous use debian and

Re: Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

They are recommends, and recommends are installed by default. But you can change this. How can this be changed? I looked through the man pages for apt-get and the config file but didn't see any way to do so. TIA, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

Hi, root mike.j...@nethere.com writes: They are recommends, and recommends are installed by default. But you can change this How can this be changed? I looked through the man pages for apt-get and the config file but didn't see any way to do so. Just add APT { Install-Recommends

Installing linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 on lenny (dependency problems)

Hi There, We have a fresh install of lenny on a VM and tried to perform the initial apt-get update/upgrade but are having issues with dependency problems. Can someone point me in the correct direction here please? Thanks Simon # apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency

how to manually fix dependency problems?

I installed an external package. This is the dependency list for the package:- dpkg-deb -I typo3-src-4.2_4.2.1-2_all.deb Depends: ttf-dejavu, libapache2-mod-php5 | libapache-mod-php5 | php5-cgi, php5-cli, libjs-prototype (= 1.6.0) However only libjs-prototype 1.6.0.2-4 is available, so I

Re: how to manually fix dependency problems?

Philip wrote: I installed an external package. This is the dependency list for the package:- dpkg-deb -I typo3-src-4.2_4.2.1-2_all.deb Depends: ttf-dejavu, libapache2-mod-php5 | libapache-mod-php5 | php5-cgi, php5-cli, libjs-prototype (= 1.6.0) However only libjs-prototype 1.6.0.2-4

Re: debconf dependency problems

Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there any workaround? There[1] seem to be a problem with debconf-i18n package in sid. It is to do with the Perl 5.10 transition. [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/05/msg00019.html

debconf dependency problems

I am trying to dist-upgrade my sid machine and am getting a dependency error: == $ apt-get -d --print-uris --ignore-hold dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Failed The following packages have unmet

Re: debconf dependency problems

Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there any workaround? There[1] seem to be a problem with debconf-i18n package in sid. It is to do with the Perl 5.10 transition. [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/05/msg00019.html hth raju -- Kamaraju S

Re: resources to resolve dependency problems

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:34:40PM -0900, Tim Jordan wrote: Hi, Can someone point me to documentation that could help resolve a dependency problem? The following packages have unmet dependencies. libapache2-mod-php4: Depends: apache2.2-common but it is not installed libxine1:

RE: resources to resolve dependency problems

-Original Message- From: Andrew Sackville-West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 7:08 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: resources to resolve dependency problems On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:34:40PM -0900, Tim Jordan wrote: Hi, Can someone

Re: resources to resolve dependency problems

-Original Message- From: Andrew Sackville-West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 7:08 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: resources to resolve dependency problems On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:34:40PM -0900, Tim Jordan wrote: Hi

resources to resolve dependency problems

Hi, Can someone point me to documentation that could help resolve a dependency problem? The following packages have unmet dependencies. libapache2-mod-php4: Depends: apache2.2-common but it is not installed libxine1: Depends: libavcodec0d (= 0.cvs20060823) but it is not installed

Re: resources to resolve dependency problems

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:34:40PM -0900, Tim Jordan wrote: Hi, Can someone point me to documentation that could help resolve a dependency problem? The following packages have unmet dependencies. libapache2-mod-php4: Depends: apache2.2-common but it is not installed libxine1:

Re: Dependency problems with GNOME 2.12 in testing

dbus-1 will be removed anyway you should recompile package, which depends on dbus-1 with new version of dbus (0.60) or you can install them from unstable Or you can wait untill dbus 0.60 transition ends, and all packages will be recompiled agains dbus 0.60 and hal 0.5.* On 2/14/06, André Wendt

apt-get openoffice dependency problems

Hello all, Perhaps because my subject was not specific enough, I did not get a response. I really need to get this computer up and usable but for now, I cannot get over this dependency issue. I dont even want openoffice installed right now. Please let me know. I recently installed a new

Re: apt-get openoffice dependency problems

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:56:15 -0800 (PST) Caleb Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Perhaps because my subject was not specific enough, I did not get a response. I really need to get this computer up and usable but for now, I cannot get over this dependency issue. I dont even want

Re: apt-get openoffice dependency problems

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:56:15AM -0800, Caleb Walker wrote: Hello all, Perhaps because my subject was not specific enough, I did not get a response. I really need to get this computer up and usable but for now, I cannot get over this dependency issue. I dont even want openoffice installed

Re: gimp dependency problems in Sid

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:11:53 -0400, H. S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So looks like gimp-data is newer and gimp is not. How do I get around this problem: Downgrade gimp-data or maybe newer gimp is yet to come? I just installed gimp 2.0.2-3 from sid, and it installed gimp-data 2.0.2-3 also. I

Re: gimp dependency problems in Sid

--- Ricky Clarkson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:11:53 -0400, H. S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So looks like gimp-data is newer and gimp is not. How do I get around this problem: Downgrade gimp-data or maybe newer gimp is yet to come? I just installed gimp 2.0.2-3 from

dselect won't show newer version, apt does. (was Re: gimp dependency problems in Sid)

Apparently, _Thomas Adam_, on 07/02/04 07:42,typed: --- Ricky Clarkson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:11:53 -0400, H. S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So looks like gimp-data is newer and gimp is not. How do I get around this problem: Downgrade gimp-data or maybe newer gimp is yet

Re: dselect won't show newer version, apt does. (was Re: gimp dependency problems in Sid)

On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 12:44:30PM -0400, H. S. wrote: dselect shows gimp-2.0.2-2, but apt-get -s install gimp shows that 2.0.2-3 version will be installed. I added a couple of other apt sourced (one in Germany and one in Neatherlands), and dselect and apt-get still show the same

gimp dependency problems in Sid

On Sid, I am having this problem with gimp since a couple of days when I did the usual upgrade. Gimp was removed and not I cannot install it. It says it needs gimp-data. I uninstalled gimp-data, and then tried to install gimp(2.0.2-2) and gimp-data(2.0.2-3) (using deslect), and it still gives

Re: apt dependency problems

'user' implies noexec, otherwise exec is the default. If var does have 'user', I'd just remove it[so the options' field is just 'defaults'], there is no reason for it. The reason I want to have 'user' or 'users' is because I want to allow non-priveleged users to mount/unmount it.

Re: apt dependency problems

Incoming from Lee Hanxue: 'user' implies noexec, otherwise exec is the default. If var does have 'user', I'd just remove it[so the options' field is just 'defaults'], there is no reason for it. The reason I want to have 'user' or 'users' is because I want to allow

Re: apt dependency problems

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:03:05 -0400 Lee Hanxue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason I want to have 'user' or 'users' is because I want to allow non-priveleged users to mount/unmount it. Actually, it is more of a convenience for me, since it is primarily my workstation. The system needs /var to

Re: apt dependency problems

This seems similar to a problem I ran into on a server that I installed here and (without thinking) set the noexec option on /var. You might try and see if that is the problem. Thanks a million! I checked /etc/fstab, and I found out I did not set the 'exec' option for the /var partition

Re: apt dependency problems

Lee Hanxue wrote: This seems similar to a problem I ran into on a server that I installed here and (without thinking) set the noexec option on /var. You might try and see if that is the problem. Thanks a million! I checked /etc/fstab, and I found out I did not set the 'exec' option for the /var

Re: apt dependency problems

On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 17:43, Lee Hanxue wrote: Preparing to replace apache 1.3.29.0.2-4 (using .../apache_1.3.29.0.2-4_i386.deb) ... dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute new pre-installation script: Permission denied dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/apache_1.3.29.0.2-4_i386.deb

apt dependency problems

Hi, Recently apache 1.3.29 (testing branch) refuse to start. I wanted to remove it, and use apache 2 instead. It seems that earlier dependency problems caused apache to be not cleanly uninstalled. I tried using apt-get remove apache apt-get remove --purge apache dpkg -r apache

Re: apt dependency problems

Lee Hanxue escribió: Hi, Recently apache 1.3.29 (testing branch) refuse to start. I wanted to remove it, and use apache 2 instead. It seems that earlier dependency problems caused apache to be not cleanly uninstalled. I tried using apt-get remove apache apt-get remove --purge apache dpkg -r

[newbie] Dependency problems installing libssl0.9.7

Hi all. I'm new to Debian, so if I'm asking any questions that's covered in the docs just point me in the right direction. I'm trying to upgrade from libssl0.9.6 that's in stable to libssl0.9.7 that's in testing. To do so, I added the followinglines to /etc/apt/sources.list: deb

Re: [newbie] Dependency problems installing libssl0.9.7

Mark Woon wrote: I'm trying to upgrade from libssl0.9.6 that's in stable to libssl0.9.7 that's in testing. Unfortunately, libssl0.9.7 has a dependency on libc6 v2.3.2, and stable comes with libc6 v2.2.5. Why do you need a newer version of libssl? Have you checked backports.org? Adam --

Re: [newbie] Dependency problems installing libssl0.9.7

Adam Aube wrote: Mark Woon wrote: I'm trying to upgrade from libssl0.9.6 that's in stable to libssl0.9.7 that's in testing. Unfortunately, libssl0.9.7 has a dependency on libc6 v2.3.2, and stable comes with libc6 v2.2.5. Why do you need a newer version of libssl? Trying to compile apache

Fixing dependency problems with some sort of alias?

With gaim being broken indefinitely, I thought I'd give ymessenger a try. I'm running unstable so there's a dependency issue with the install (libssl0.9.6 is required but I have libssl0.9.7). I used --ignore-depends on the dpkg install command to get ymessenger installed and it works fine. But

Re: Fixing dependency problems with some sort of alias?

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:26:08 -0500 Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With gaim being broken indefinitely, I thought I'd give ymessenger a try. I'm running unstable so there's a dependency issue with the install(libssl0.9.6 is required but I have libssl0.9.7). I used --ignore-depends on

Re: Fixing dependency problems with some sort of alias?

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:26:08AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: With gaim being broken indefinitely, I thought I'd give ymessenger a try. I'm running unstable so there's a dependency issue with the install (libssl0.9.6 is required but I have libssl0.9.7). I used --ignore-depends on the dpkg

Re: dependency problems

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Martin Wegmann said hello, I have some dependency problems - broken packages and tried to fix them with apt-get -f install/remove but that does not work, any advice how to proceed? using testing

dependency problems

hello, I have some dependency problems - broken packages and tried to fix them with apt-get -f install/remove but that does not work, any advice how to proceed? using testing/unstable Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/baliola# dpkg --configure -a dpkg: dependency problems prevent

Re: dependency problems

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Martin Wegmann said hello, I have some dependency problems - broken packages and tried to fix them with apt-get -f install/remove but that does not work, any advice how to proceed? using testing/unstable Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home

Weird dependency problems installing mplayer...

upgradeable from 1.0rc3-1 to 1.0.0-2 end output so it looks to be like audiolibs IS installed, while strangely it thinks that libavcodec0 is installed while having no version in archive. I should also note that apt-get check does not report any dependency problems. The whole problem seems

Re: Kmail(kde 3.1) dependency problems

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:42:23PM +0200, Tinus Kotze wrote: I am currently running Debian Unstable. I use a official local mirror that is constantly being updated. We also have a kde mirror. I have the following problem installing kmail. Can somebody please help me. If you wanted to use

Kmail(kde 3.1) dependency problems

I am currently running Debian Unstable. I use a official local mirror that is constantly being updated. We also have a kde mirror. I have the following problem installing kmail. Can somebody please help me. [/home/jmak]# apt-get install kmail Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency

Re: Kmail(kde 3.1) dependency problems

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:42:23PM +0200, Tinus Kotze wrote: I have the following problem installing kmail. Can somebody please help me. kdenetwork (including kmail) has not yet been updated to KDE 3 in unstable. The KDE 2 version isn't simultaneously installable with it (largely by mistake,

Dependency problems with the g++ package

Hi =) this is my problem: Enterprise:~# apt-get install g++ [cut] Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: g++: Depends: g++-3.2 (= 1:3.2.2-0pre2) but it is not going to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages Enterprise:~# ok so let's see what's wrong: Enterprise:~#

Re: Dependency problems with the g++ package

On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 03:23:49PM +0100, Peppe wrote: Enterprise:~# apt-get install libstdc++5-dev [cut] Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: libstdc++5-dev: Depends: libc12-dev but it is not installable Please check the bug tracking system's records for

Re: dependency problems

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:46:11AM +, Dave Selby wrote: | I run debian woody, This same driver works flawlessly on redhat 7.2, | If I do the following on debian, it actually works but I have persistent | dependency issues which I cannot solve ?? | | My debian is standard, I have upgraded the

dependency problems

I run debian woody, This same driver works flawlessly on redhat 7.2, If I do the following on debian, it actually works but I have persistent dependency issues which I cannot solve ?? My debian is standard, I have upgraded the kernel to 2.4.19, apart from that everything is standard. Any ideas

Re: serious dependency problems

On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 09:52:10PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:40:06PM -0500, sam rosenfeld wrote: I have tried unsuccessfully to install many packages and programs -- from math programs to pine, sawfish and libc6.2. In most cases the problem is one in which the

Re: serious dependency problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 20 January 2002 4:25 pm, sam rosenfeld wrote: I confess that I know next to nothing about the distinction between runtime and development versions of the libraries. libx contains the library binary that a binary application that uses

Re: serious dependency problems

On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:25:07AM -0500, sam rosenfeld wrote: On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 09:52:10PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: You'll have to be more specific. It's possible that you only have runtime versions of libraries involved, while you need development (-dev) versions in order to build

Re: serious dependency problems

Give examples: What did you try to install? Debian package (apt-get) or source (make)? What error message did you get? -- Joachim Fahnenmüller Lehrer für Mathematik und Physik Herder-Gymnasium Kattowitzer Straße 52 51065 Köln

Re: serious dependency problems

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:40:06PM -0500, sam rosenfeld wrote: I have tried unsuccessfully to install many packages and programs -- from math programs to pine, sawfish and libc6.2. In most cases the problem is one in which the 'make' closes with errors that list dependencies it could not

serious dependency problems

I have tried unsuccessfully to install many packages and programs -- from math programs to pine, sawfish and libc6.2. In most cases the problem is one in which the 'make' closes with errors that list dependencies it could not find. Occasionally, and perhaps unrelated, the error message reads

Re: serious dependency problems

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:40:06 -0500 sam rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have tried unsuccessfully to install many packages and programs -- from math programs to pine, sawfish and libc6.2. In most cases the problem is one in which the 'make' closes with errors that list dependencies it

Re: serious dependency problems

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:50:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:40:06 -0500 sam rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have tried unsuccessfully to install many packages and programs -- from math programs to pine, sawfish and libc6.2. In most cases the problem is one

dependency problems

identity of mkinitrd; possible dependency problems with woody

The instructions for 2.4 kernels say that mkinitrd should be upgraded; debian has no package by that name; is this the same as mkinitrd-cd or is it something different? Thinking it might be the same as mkinitrd-cd, I tried to install it and was told some packages could not install. There is

Re: identity of mkinitrd; possible dependency problems with woody

The instructions for 2.4 kernels say that mkinitrd should be upgraded; debian has no package by that name; is this the same as mkinitrd-cd or is it something different? As far as I can tell, mkinitrd != mkinitrd-cd. packages.debian.org shows that mkinitrd is supplied by initrd-tools.

Python and python-base dependency problems

Hi All ! Since yesterday I'm having dependency problems with python and python-base. Dselect wants me to remove Koffice. Can somebody give me a clue ?? Thanks all ! Daniel -- There is no spoon... - The Matrix

Re: Python and python-base dependency problems

On 22-Nov-2001 Daniel Toffetti wrote: Hi All ! Since yesterday I'm having dependency problems with python and python-base. Dselect wants me to remove Koffice. Can somebody give me a clue ?? python-base (which was python 1.5) went away. Debian still has python 1.5 hwoever the default

Re: Python and python-base dependency problems

Sean == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sean On 22-Nov-2001 Daniel Toffetti wrote: Daniel Since yesterday I'm having dependency problems with python and Daniel python-base. Dselect wants me to remove Koffice. Can somebody Daniel give me a clue ?? Put the python-base package

Re: Xfree 4.1 with potato and dependency problems

Marcel Figuerola Estrada said: What do you suggest me to do? Are potato and Xfree 4.1 really compatible? depends where you get the packages..the ones i got a while back (don't have them anymore i don't think..) worked ok in potato seems you got the wrong package for libfreetype, which depended

Xfree 4.1 with potato and dependency problems

not included in the potato CDs. When I try to install this package other conflict and dependency problems occur, so I wonder if it will become a never ending chain. I've thought about upgrading to Woody to get rid of those dependency problems, but I would prefer to stay with potato as I'm still novice

Re: Xfree 4.1 with potato and dependency problems

not included in the potato CDs. When I try to install this package other conflict and dependency problems occur, so I wonder if it will become a never ending chain. I've thought about upgrading to Woody to get rid of those dependency problems, but I would prefer to stay with potato as I'm still

Re: Xfree 4.1 with potato and dependency problems

on libc=2.2. which I downlooaded too because it's not included in the potato CDs. When I try to install this package other conflict and dependency problems occur, so I wonder if it will become a never ending chain. I've thought about upgrading to Woody to get rid of those dependency

Dependency problems with ddd

I'm trying to upgrade ddd 3.2.1-3 to 3.2.1-4 in woody. In the package information for ddd I see it recommends gdb = 4.17, but when checking dependencies, dselect complains about ddd recommending gdb = 5.0. Current version of gbd in woody is 4.18.199909. Should I post it to the

Re: Dependency problems with ddd

I'm trying to upgrade ddd 3.2.1-3 to 3.2.1-4 in woody. In the package information for ddd I see it recommends gdb = 4.17, but when checking dependencies, dselect complains about ddd recommending gdb = 5.0. Current version of gbd in woody is 4.18.199909. Should I post it to the

Dependency Problems with Ximiam-GNOME Install

Hi Everyone- I'm trying to install Ximian GNOME with apt, but I am having some problems. I've added the following line to my sources.list file: deb http://red-carpet.ximian.com/debian stable main and then updated the package lists. I follow that up with: apt-get install

dependency problems when installing apps from original sources

Hi everybody, I'm trying to install glib 1.2.8 from it's original source file obtained from gnome.org The problem is, that old debian package libglib1.2 (1.2.7-2) is still present. I tried dpkg -r --force-depends libglib1.2which removed the old package, but left mess in dependencies

  1   2   >