John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
Then that should be:
$ patch --gen-diff
$ patch --apply-diff
The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in
System III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application
by patch, which was written by Larry
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:10:15 +0200, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James A. Donald wrote:
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:52:47 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/10/08 22:22, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
...
(If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the
UN [besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they
[the UN
On 09/10/08 22:17, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:31:51 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right,
On 09/10/08 18:49, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
Then that should be:
$ patch --gen-diff
$ patch --apply-diff
The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in System
III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application by
patch, which was
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work any more, I acquired the habit of
Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
I have reply to mailing list 0.3.1 and it works ok with Icedove here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
It is considered experimental on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
never had a problem with it.
Thanks. It doesn't work
Ron Johnson wrote:
(If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the UN
[besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they [the UN
and the EU...] spew lots of pretty words, but don't have the testicles
to enforce them.)
In the UN's case it was specifically
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
I have reply to mailing list 0.3.1 and it works ok with Icedove here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
It is considered experimental on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
never had a problem with it.
Thanks! It works here,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:08:40AM +0200, Tim Edwards wrote:
..., or Australia armed with nuclear powered Kangaroos
and sharks with laser beams :) (we could do it you know - don't try and
stop us!)
I thought the Kiwis did all the development stuff
Dave
--
... (I tried to get
On 09/11/08 02:53, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
I have reply to mailing list 0.3.1 and it works ok with Icedove here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
It is considered experimental on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
never had
On 2008-Sep-11, at 5:08 AM, Tim Edwards wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
(If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the
UN [besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they
[the UN and the EU...] spew lots of pretty words, but don't have
the testicles to
Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
the author's prejudice, but...
We don't like the EU because
of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived of and
implemented by socialists. It's that simple.
Socialists?
You mean the kind of people
On 09/11/08 12:19, Jeff Soules wrote:
Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
the author's prejudice, but...
We don't like the EU because
of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived of and
implemented by socialists. It's that simple.
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/11/08 12:19, Jeff Soules wrote:
Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
the author's prejudice, but...
We don't like the EU because
of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived
of and
implemented by socialists.
Ron Johnson wrote:
This works for me:
http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson/replytolist-0.2.1.xpi
v0.3.0 fails, since I use IMAP.
I think that you need to install the Mnenhy add-on.
Yes, downgrading to 0.2.1 works for me also. I don't think Icedove needs Mnenhy
(but stock Thunderbird 2.x
If all rights descend from the government (whether that be an absolute
monarchy or a parliament), then I'd posit that no, you don't have a right to
defend home and hearth.
That doesn't follow.
If rights descend from the government, then you have a right to defend
home and hearth if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thveillon.debian wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
the two versions side by side, with the differences
highlighted by color
git-gui, however gives me a diff where I see a single
stream annotated with + and -
I find the single stream display really obscure, ugly,
and confusing.
So if I
I recommend meld package
See you later !
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM, James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
the two versions side by side, with the differences
highlighted by color
git-gui, however gives me a diff where I see
On Wed,10.Sep.08, 17:52:49, James A. Donald wrote:
[...]
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the way they do in
windows?
I'm almost sure it can be done by combining git with a tool like vimdiff
(vim actually, but I'm sure emacs has something similar).
Regards,
Andrei
--
Le Mer 10 septembre 2008 09:52, James A. Donald a écrit :
[...]
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
I use Mercurial instead of GIT, but it is very close. I use it under Unix
(Solaris and Linux) and Windows. And I use KDiff3 under Unix and Windows
too.
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
the two versions side by side, with the differences
highlighted by color
git-gui, however gives me a diff where I see a single
stream annotated with + and -
I find the single stream
On 09/10/08 04:04, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
[snip]
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
/rhetorical question
If you insist that things in linux should be just like in windows, why
bother using linux?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:52:49PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
You can also look ast colordiff
(http://freshmeat.net/projects/colordiff/). I have not used it though.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies
On 2008-09-10 11:18, Johann Spies wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:52:49PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
You can also look ast colordiff
(http://freshmeat.net/projects/colordiff/). I have not used it though.
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
http://www.jim.com/ James A. Donald
I am happy that
On 2008-Sep-10, at 7:31 AM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
On 09/10/08 09:39, Rob McBroom wrote:
On 2008-Sep-10, at 7:31 AM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary
James A. Donald wrote:
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file. The output
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
James A. Donald wrote:
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
snip
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called patch, not diff.
See man patch. diff consists of differences
On 09/10/08 18:28, gary turner wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
snip
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be
used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called patch, not diff.
See man
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 18:28, gary turner wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
snip
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be
used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called patch,
Ron Johnson writes:
Then that should be:
$ patch --gen-diff
$ patch --apply-diff
The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in System
III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application by
patch, which was written by Larry Wall in 1984.
--
John Hasler
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:31:51 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The one place where I might disagree with the Declaration of
Independence is where Rights come from, since I want to think that
rights come from the barrel of a gun.
You do?
Or, maybe, that those unalienable
On 09/10/08 22:22, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The one place where I might disagree with the Declaration of
Independence is where Rights come from, since I want to think that
rights come from the barrel of a gun.
You do?
Or,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:52:47AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
There was a time when he commanded a huge army...
Not just (a) huge army, but LOTS of huge armies. He commanded kings.
Regards,
Dave
--
Thasai, Ampoe Meuang | Linux - Das System fuer schlaue
Nonthaburi |
40 matches
Mail list logo
