On 2007-08-30 18:40:26 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:46:05PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2007-08-29 21:38:44 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Reading /usr/share/doc/tex4ht/html/index.html, says that:
>
> Usage is simplified via the Perl script mk4ht whi
On 8/30/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:46:05PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2007-08-29 21:38:44 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > Try tex4ht. Makes html, docbook, +?
> >
> [snip slew of errors when using tex4ht directly from the command line
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:46:05PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-08-29 21:38:44 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Try tex4ht. Makes html, docbook, +?
>
[snip slew of errors when using tex4ht directly from the command line]
Reading /usr/share/doc/tex4ht/html/index.html, says that:
On 2007-08-29 21:38:44 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Try tex4ht. Makes html, docbook, +?
On the same file:
vin:~/wd/tex> tex4ht wcinverse.tex
tex4ht.c (2007-04-21-21:07 kpathsea)
tex4ht wcinverse.tex
--- warning --- Problem with command line
--- error --- Can't f
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:06:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-08-27 20:35:36 -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > After trying every converter I could find, I discovered HeVeA. HeVeA
> > takes LaTeX files and produces beautiful HTML, with much less hassle
> > than any of the other solu
On 2007-08-28 13:28:34 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Docbook also seems to have been designed by masochists it's so
> horribly verbose that I can't imagine how people put up with maintaining
> documents written using it. It's as if the creators got so carried away
> adding features that they com
On 2007-08-27 20:35:36 -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> After trying every converter I could find, I discovered HeVeA. HeVeA
> takes LaTeX files and produces beautiful HTML, with much less hassle
> than any of the other solutions which I found. HeVeA handles LaTeX
> documents with complex format
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:15:01 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> I want to write big document (say reports) ( sometimes with math
>> symboles and functions, not always).
>> Which is better and in which cases, I have to use docbook or latex??
>
> Considering that this i
abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to write big document (say reports) ( sometimes with math
> symboles and functions, not always).
> Which is better and in which cases, I have to use docbook or latex??
>
> thanks for help
>
>
>
Have a look at LyX [1] whi
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAIK, docbook is designed for creating manuals that can be
> turned into ps, pdf, text, or html without using external packages or
> requiring a huge meta-package install.
Docbook also seems to have been designed by masochists it's so
horribly
abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to write big document (say reports) ( sometimes with math
> symboles and functions, not always).
> Which is better and in which cases, I have to use docbook or latex??
>
These days I am using texmacs for anything that I previously
* Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070827 20:28]:
>On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> On 2007-08-27 13:15:01 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>> ... Since there are readily
>>> available (as debian packages) ways to turn latex into html, I use latex
>>> for ever
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-08-27 13:15:01 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Considering that this is exactly what latex was designed for, I would
> > use latex. AFAIK, docbook is designed for creating manuals that can be
> > turned into ps, pdf, tex
On 2007-08-27 13:15:01 +, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Considering that this is exactly what latex was designed for, I would
> use latex. AFAIK, docbook is designed for creating manuals that can be
> turned into ps, pdf, text, or html without using external packages or
> requiring a huge meta-pac
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:29:38AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> I want to write big document (say reports) ( sometimes with math
> symboles and functions, not always).
> Which is better and in which cases, I have to use docbook or latex??
>
Considering that this is exactl
Hi,
I want to write big document (say reports) ( sometimes with math
symboles and functions, not always).
Which is better and in which cases, I have to use docbook or latex??
thanks for help
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
16 matches
Mail list logo
