Matteo Riva schrieb:
> Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
>
> How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
> driver was working fine?
> What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
> versions?
>
>
Hi all!
I have two questions reg
Matteo Riva schrieb:
> Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
>
> How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
> driver was working fine?
> What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
> versions?
>
>
Hi all!
I have two questions reg
Matteo Riva wrote:
Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
driver was working fine?
What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
versions?
1.7 is a major headache for me:
http://bugs.debi
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:25 +0100, Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:40 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
>
> Thanks! I had looked at the log but I guess I missed the error line
> mentioning dri module not being loaded do to an error.
>
> Installing the firmware-linux package
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:40 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> A good starting point would be to look at your /var/log/Xorg.0.log for
> errors (EE) and warnings (WW). Nowadays X his supposed to handle dri or
> compositing alone, but sometime it helps to show him the way. On the
> contrary by
Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Wolodja Wentland
> wrote:
>
>> I use the radeonhd driver and am very happy with its performance. I ran
>> into the same behaviour you described some time ago and fixed it by using EXA
>> as acceleration method. The applicable part from my xor
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Wolodja Wentland
wrote:
> I use the radeonhd driver and am very happy with its performance. I ran
> into the same behaviour you described some time ago and fixed it by using EXA
> as acceleration method. The applicable part from my xorg.conf is:
>
> --- snip ---
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:04 +0100, Matteo Riva wrote:
> 2010/1/30 Johan Grönqvist :
> > Have you tried both the radeon and the radeonhd
> Yes I have tried both drivers and couldn't see any appreciable
> difference.
I use the radeonhd driver and am very happy with its performance. I ran
into th
2010/1/30 Johan Grönqvist :
> Have you tried both the radeon and the radeonhd
> drivers? As I understand it, they should be similar in feature set, but I
> had issues (slow scrolling, among others) with the radeon driver that I do
> not experience with the radeonhd driver.
Yes I have tried both
Matteo Riva skrev:
Yes I am using the free driver now but the performance is poor. Actually
I get a strange behavior:
Have you tried both the radeon and the radeonhd
drivers? As I understand it, they should be similar in feature set,
but I had issues (slow scrolling, among others) with the
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:00 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before going the (hard) downgrade way, did you try using the free
> "radeon" driver (or whichever is relevant for your card). I "fixed" a
> computer crippled by the same problem yesterday, running an Ati
> HD2600XT, and t
Stefaan Himpe wrote:
>
>> I found snapshot.debian.net but it seems its last update was on 2008 or
>> am I looking in the wrong place
> Sorry I should have checked before pointing you there.
> Make sure to backup any important files (like configuration stuff in /etc)
> before you start to fiddle wi
I found snapshot.debian.net but it seems its last update was on 2008 or
am I looking in the wrong place
Sorry I should have checked before pointing you there.
Make sure to backup any important files (like configuration stuff in /etc)
before you start to fiddle with these things.
Disclaimer: I'
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
> I also needed to downgrade when the nvidia driver was broken a few weeks
> ago. I managed to do so as root using dpkg with the -i option.
> Note that apt-get from that moment on complained about some broken packages
> on my system (until I d
I also needed to downgrade when the nvidia driver was broken a few weeks
ago. I managed to do so as root using dpkg with the -i option.
Note that apt-get from that moment on complained about some broken
packages on my system (until I did a dist-upgrade when the nvidia driver
was fixed).
For do
On Friday 29 January 2010 09:51:02 Matteo Riva wrote:
> Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
>
> How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
> driver was working fine?
> What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
> versions?
Packag
Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
driver was working fine?
What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
versions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
;>> to the lenny xorg? i'm thinking about forcing dpkg to remove all the
>>>>> xserver-xorg* packages despite deps, and then just using apt to isntall
>>>>> the testing ones, then apt-get check?
>>>>> Good idea, bad idea, suicide?
>>>
On Mon March 10 2008 22:24:50 Rich Healey wrote:
> But wouldn't that also remove every X application i haven't built from
> source as well, due to dependencies?
Your X applications depend on the X client, not the X server.
The X client is a whole bunch of libraries such as libx11-6.
--Mike Bird
On Mon March 10 2008 21:54:26 Rich Healey wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 03/10/08 19:37, Rich Healey wrote:
> >> This is my work machine so my usual tolerance for breaking stuff in the
> >> persuit of knowledge is suspended.
>
> i was asking whether do
> Good idea, bad idea, suicide?
>>> That's what I'd do...
>>>> This is my work machine so my usual tolerance for breaking stuff in the
>>>> persuit of knowledge is suspended.
>> i was asking whether downgrading xorg *was* suicide, not offerin
despite deps, and then just using apt to isntall
>>> the testing ones, then apt-get check?
>>> Good idea, bad idea, suicide?
>> That's what I'd do...
>
>>> This is my work machine so my usual tolerance for breaking stuff in the
>>> persuit of knowledg
pt-get check?
>
>> Good idea, bad idea, suicide?
>
> That's what I'd do...
>
>> This is my work machine so my usual tolerance for breaking stuff in the
>> persuit of knowledge is suspended.
>
i was asking whether downgrading xorg *was* suicide, not o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/08 19:37, Rich Healey wrote:
> Last night while bored and reading this list I saw that many use the
> unstable version of Xorg on testing systems, and so I decided to do this
> as well.
>
> Works fine, well in fact, except that if i try to re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Last night while bored and reading this list I saw that many use the
unstable version of Xorg on testing systems, and so I decided to do this
as well.
Works fine, well in fact, except that if i try to resize a VM in
VirtualBox it mangles my display, b
So, obviously the source for my version of XOrg (6.9.0) not there. I
tried through ATI web page
(https://support.ati.com/ics/support/default.asp?deptID=894&task=knowledge&folderID=300),
but it has only version for X.Org 6.8. So Flavio's installer is
downloading .rpm packages preconfigured for d
Jonathan Kaye wrote:
Ivan Glushkov wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to downgrade my Xorg version, since I need that for
installing the ATI drivers (fglrx). The problem is that they need
version < 6.8.9, and I have currently 6.9.0. I tried to change my
sources.list to point to testing, and I was thinkin
Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to downgrade my Xorg version, since I need that for
> installing the ATI drivers (fglrx). The problem is that they need
> version < 6.8.9, and I have currently 6.9.0. I tried to change my
> sources.list to point to testing, and I was thinking that simple
Hi,
I am trying to downgrade my Xorg version, since I need that for
installing the ATI drivers (fglrx). The problem is that they need
version < 6.8.9, and I have currently 6.9.0. I tried to change my
sources.list to point to testing, and I was thinking that simple
apt-get update
apt-get upgra
29 matches
Mail list logo
