On 2010-01-26, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
--nextPart7215540.ksqcIOTIpo
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 06:39:24 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
Now, I get why the elinks package is scheduled
In hjp7pj$k1...@ger.gmane.org, Jeffrey Cao wrote:
On 2010-01-26, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 06:39:24 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
Now, I get why the elinks package is scheduled to be removed. The
dependency must be wrong for elinks-data package as
elinks.
Anyone know why elinks will be removed from squeeze? Or this is just
a mistake?
Jeffrey
Package elinks
* etch (oldstable) (web): advanced text-mode WWW browser
0.11.1-1.2etch2 [security]: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mipsel
powerpc s390 sparc
0.11.1-1.2etch1: mips
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 06:39:24 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
Now, I get why the elinks package is scheduled to be removed. The
dependency must be wrong for elinks-data package as follows.
Conflicts: elinks ( 0.11.3-1), elinks-lite
Replaces: elinks ( 0.11.3-1)
That looks correct, for the case when
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:32:26PM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:09:40PM EST, Freeman wrote:
[..]
Is there really even a point to filing a bug report against something
when the fix is upstream?
What makes you think the bug is upstream?
Literally speaking, the
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 03:43:42AM EST, Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:32:26PM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:09:40PM EST, Freeman wrote:
[..]
I hadn't thought much of it and scarfed libtre5 from sid. Will it not
install to lenny?
Probably would, but I'm
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:21:24PM +, Jeffrey Cao wrote:
sure elinks has not been updated for a long time. So, what is changed
to make elinks depends on libtre5?
I don't know about this particular case, but in general, one of two
things probably happened:
- The upstream author changed
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 03:24:43PM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:21:24PM +, Jeffrey Cao wrote:
sure elinks has not been updated for a long time. So, what is changed
to make elinks depends on libtre5?
I don't know about this particular case, but in general,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:09:40PM EST, Freeman wrote:
[..]
Is there really even a point to filing a bug report against something
when the fix is upstream?
What makes you think the bug is upstream?
I recently installed the 0.13 git version of ELinks to resolve an
unrelated issue and since
On 2010-01-20, Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote:
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 14:44:20 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
On 2010-01-20, Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote:
Ouppsss, sorry
And libtre5 is in squeeze, so you to wait for it to move to sdueeze
I mean
And libtre5 is in sid,
Today when I ran sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade,
I got the message that the package elinks will be removed. I cancelled
this upgrade, since that I'm now using elinks.
Anyone know why elinks will be removed from squeeze? Or this is just
a mistake?
Jeffrey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 13:50:58 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
Today when I ran sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade,
I got the message that the package elinks will be removed. I cancelled
this upgrade, since that I'm now using elinks.
Anyone know why elinks will be removed from squeeze
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 13:50:58 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
Today when I ran sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade,
I got the message that the package elinks will be removed. I cancelled
this upgrade, since that I'm now using elinks.
Anyone know why elinks will be removed from squeeze
Ouppsss, sorry
And libtre5 is in squeeze, so you to wait for it to move to sdueeze
I mean
And libtre5 is in sid, so you to wait for it to move to squeeze
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 2010-01-20, Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote:
Ouppsss, sorry
And libtre5 is in squeeze, so you to wait for it to move to sdueeze
I mean
And libtre5 is in sid, so you to wait for it to move to squeeze
Thierry
But I installed elinks one year ago without dependency problem.
I
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 14:44:20 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
On 2010-01-20, Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote:
Ouppsss, sorry
And libtre5 is in squeeze, so you to wait for it to move to sdueeze
I mean
And libtre5 is in sid, so you to wait for it to move to squeeze
Thierry
But
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:30:52PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 14:44:20 Jeffrey Cao wrote:
On 2010-01-20, Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote:
Ouppsss, sorry
And libtre5 is in squeeze, so you to wait for it to move to sdueeze
I mean
And
17 matches
Mail list logo
