Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> On Friday 31 July 2015 19:59:40 David Wright wrote:
> > Ironically, your suggestion yesterday (ifconfig)
> > was not so potentially useful for a different reason (ifconfig might
> > not be there), but of course you didn't have the context.
>
> I was sug
Le 31/07/2015 21:26, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> On Friday 31 July 2015 19:59:40 David Wright wrote:
>> Ironically, your suggestion yesterday (ifconfig)
>> was not so potentially useful for a different reason (ifconfig might
>> not be there), but of course you didn't have the context.
> I was suggesti
Le 31/07/2015 17:55, David Wright a écrit :
> Quoting Diogene Laerce (me_buss...@yahoo.fr):
...
> I was reluctant to make any comment on your first post because, at the
> end of it, I wasn't sure how many computers you were using and what
> was and wasn't running on them.
>
> Having in the past p
On Friday 31 July 2015 19:59:40 David Wright wrote:
> Ironically, your suggestion yesterday (ifconfig)
> was not so potentially useful for a different reason (ifconfig might
> not be there), but of course you didn't have the context.
I was suggesting it in a very specific context, and did know tha
On Friday 31 July 2015 10:00:06 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 31 July 2015 14:50:18 Bob Bernstein wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > To use my fixed address methods, which are officialy
> > > discouraged by the list police...
> >
> > And what, exactly, pray tell, do those au
On Friday 31 July 2015 09:50:18 Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > To use my fixed address methods, which are officialy
> > discouraged by the list police...
>
> And what, exactly, pray tell, do those august
> personages ("the list police") preach?
They have been
Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> On Friday 31 July 2015 18:15:14 The Wanderer wrote:
> > I usually interpret "parse" in this sort of context to refer to machine
> > parsing, not reading by humans
>
> Ah! I'll certainly accept that. I took it to mean:
> 1. (linguistics) To resolve int
On Friday 31 July 2015 18:15:14 The Wanderer wrote:
> I usually interpret "parse" in this sort of context to refer to machine
> parsing, not reading by humans
Ah! I'll certainly accept that. I took it to mean:
1. (linguistics) To resolve into its elements, as a sentence, pointing out the
severa
On 07/31/2015 at 12:37 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> And no, ip is not easier to parse. It may be for you, and even for
> most people - but I find it so difficult to read that it is hard to
> get anything out of it. (And I do mean read - physically read). But
> ip clearly gives more information - _if
On Friday 31 July 2015 16:55:45 David Wright wrote:
> Yes, ifconfig's indentation
> is prettier when you just want a quick summary, but ip is more
> flexible and the output is much easier /to parse/. Emphasis directed
> at Lisi :)
:-) I wanted to be able to read it - and the OP had said that he h
Quoting Diogene Laerce (me_buss...@yahoo.fr):
> Le 30/07/2015 18:35, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 29 July 2015 18:09:36 Diogene Laerce wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have big issues recently with debian that I don't understand, maybe
> >> someone could help on the matter ?
> >>
> >> First, de
On Friday 31 July 2015 14:50:18 Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > To use my fixed address methods, which are officialy
> > discouraged by the list police...
>
> And what, exactly, pray tell, do those august
> personages ("the list police") preach? Something tells
>
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Gene Heskett wrote:
To use my fixed address methods, which are officialy
discouraged by the list police...
And what, exactly, pray tell, do those august
personages ("the list police") preach? Something tells
me that what you jocularly term "my fixed address
methods" are
On Friday 31 July 2015 05:58:28 Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Le 30/07/2015 18:35, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 29 July 2015 18:09:36 Diogene Laerce wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have big issues recently with debian that I don't understand,
> >> maybe someone could help on the matter ?
> >>
> >>
Le 30/07/2015 18:35, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> On Wednesday 29 July 2015 18:09:36 Diogene Laerce wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have big issues recently with debian that I don't understand, maybe
>> someone could help on the matter ?
>>
>> First, debian does not want to give me any network. I really say debi
Le 30/07/2015 15:29, Diogene Laerce a écrit :
Hi,
Le 29/07/2015 20:37, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe a écrit :
Hi,
What's the result of dmesg? In particular: dmesg|grep .fw?
You can find the results here :
dmesg -> http://pastebin.com/YPdmfkyG
lspci -n -> http://pastebin.com/y6xEUfiL
hmmm
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:29:01PM +0200, Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 29/07/2015 20:37, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe a écrit :
...snip...
>
> > Eave you checked from lspci -n if the module of the kernel is the
> > correct one?
>
> I think it is but I don't fully understand what y
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 18:09:36 Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have big issues recently with debian that I don't understand, maybe
> someone could help on the matter ?
>
> First, debian does not want to give me any network. I really say debian
> because I have 3 possibilities to run the OS :
Hi,
Le 29/07/2015 20:37, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> What's the result of dmesg? In particular: dmesg|grep .fw?
You can find the results here :
dmesg -> http://pastebin.com/YPdmfkyG
lspci -n -> http://pastebin.com/y6xEUfiL
And I put /sudo lspci -vvv /as well as I didn't
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:37:31PM +0200, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the result of dmesg? In particular: dmesg|grep .fw? Maybe you need
> some firmware?
>
> Eave you checked from lspci -n if the module of the kernel is the correct
> one?
Also, I don't believe the OP states whi
Hi,
What's the result of dmesg? In particular: dmesg|grep .fw? Maybe you
need some firmware?
Eave you checked from lspci -n if the module of the kernel is the
correct one?
Regards,
Le 29/07/2015 19:09, Diogene Laerce a écrit :
Hi,
I have big issues recently with debian that I don't under
Hi,
I have big issues recently with debian that I don't understand, maybe
someone could help on the matter ?
First, debian does not want to give me any network. I really say debian
because I have 3 possibilities to run the OS : 2 USB sticks and a PC
tower, all
on wheezy, which worked fine til the
ver.
>
> But everything I do gives me this error: "eth0 no such device". I'm sure
> I'm missing something obvious but I just don't know what.
>
> I did look at /dev/MAKEDEV and it tells me network devices are in
> /proc/net/dev. But that file is empty.
> I believe
> I have correct driver.
> Thanks for any advice.
Start by telling uss what card it is, and what chipset it uses. If it is a PCI
device, you should with almost complete certanty _not_ add anything to
lilo.conf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hi,
Can anyone give me any clues on how to get my ethernet card working. It
works on W2K on other partition so I know card is fine. I've added
append parameters to lilo.conf which I think are correct. And I believe
I have correct driver.
But everything I do gives me this error: "et
25 matches
Mail list logo
