Re: exim: too many connections?

2008-03-17 Thread Monique Y. Mudama
On 2008-03-13, Paul Johnson penned: Are you already using greylisting? If not, the easiest way to set this up is to install the greylistd package and follow the easy instructions in /usr/share/doc/greylistd. The whole process should take download time+5 *dropping in after a long absence*

Re: exim: too many connections?

2008-03-15 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:03:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thursday 13 March 2008 03:03:01 pm Andrew Sackville-West wrote: also, fail2ban's later versions (sid at least) include support for exim and it will install cleanly on etch. fail2ban looks interesting. Is there any way to

exim: too many connections?

2008-03-13 Thread will trillich
hey debianistas, long time no chat! debian cruises along rock solid so nicely... :) but recently we're seeing a TON of these -- 2008-03-13 10:32:36 Connection from [67.55.80.182] refused: too many connections 2008-03-13 10:32:37 Connection from [75.146.102.69] refused: too many connections

Re: exim: too many connections?

2008-03-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thursday 13 March 2008 09:49:27 am will trillich wrote: hey debianistas, long time no chat! debian cruises along rock solid so nicely... :) You're always welcome to pipe up when you see a topic you know about, too. :o) but recently we're seeing a TON of these -- 2008-03-13 10:32:36

Re: exim: too many connections?

2008-03-13 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:41:59AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thursday 13 March 2008 09:49:27 am will trillich wrote: hey debianistas, long time no chat! debian cruises along rock solid so nicely... :) You're always welcome to pipe up when you see a topic you know about, too. :o)

Re: exim: too many connections?

2008-03-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thursday 13 March 2008 03:03:01 pm Andrew Sackville-West wrote: also, fail2ban's later versions (sid at least) include support for exim and it will install cleanly on etch. fail2ban looks interesting. Is there any way to have it use exim's ACLs instead of doing it at the packet level? --