Hi,
have a similar situation in the office. According to the Exim docs, Exim was
not made to handle this problem. The work arounds are:
1. to use two machines (the method I use) one as a smart host and the other for
local delivery of network mail
2. to use to installs of Exim on one machine,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:51:28AM -0400, William Cooper wrote:
Hi,
have a similar situation in the office. According to the Exim docs, Exim
was
not made to handle this problem. The work arounds are:
Things have changed, newer exim versions (at least newer then potato's),
allow to
Hi!
Could anybody help me with configering exim correctly?
I have installed exim on a machine with a dialup connection to my isp.
This machine, named meister.kosmos, should relay emails from other
machines on my local network (*.komsos) and should send them per smtp
when connecting to my isp. I
What version of exim are you using? I'm going to have to upgrade to
this, because this behavior is what I want. Currently, I use a
patched exim to get exactly this behavior. If exim now does this by
default (that is, local mail _doesn't_ get rewritten) I can stop using
my hacked together
SL == Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SL And say I am on your machine and want to make a report and have it
SL comes back to my machine (rpglink.com). Are you going to insert
SL another rewrite rule?
Yes. If I don't, the default rewrite would apply.
SL Now apply that to, say, an ISP
DE == Daniel Elenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DE So, I use exim to do a rewrite on the 'from' and 'reply-to' fields
DE of outgoing mail sent by me. The problem is, like I've pointed out
DE before, that local mail isn't affected by this. I don't understand
DE why not!?
I don't know exim, but
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 01:50:37AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
SL And say I am on your machine and want to make a report and have it
SL comes back to my machine (rpglink.com). Are you going to insert
SL another rewrite rule?
Yes. If I don't, the default rewrite would apply.
Which
SL == Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SL Says who? We have two shell machines. web1.calweb.com and
SL web2.calweb.com. But we'd prefer mail go to mx.calweb.com or
SL mail.calweb.com. We could put in a rewrite rule but that would,
SL as you say above, screw up any user level
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 02:59:42AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
Of cause it is up to them. The script runs as a gid who can change the
file. They may only change their own entry (realuid), so there is no
problem with this.
Erm, no.
SL If it cannot put in the proper address, that is a
I have a line in my exim.conf that rewrites my from and reply-to
addresses,
like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fr
danel698... is my 'real' mail address, on my POP3 mail-server. I don't
want people to get my [EMAIL PROTECTED], since I don't have my computer turned
on all the time.
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fr
Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus| employer's. They hired me for my
SL == Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SL [1 text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)]
SL On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fr
SL Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
Because you don't always use a MUA when you send mails. Take the bug
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 04:03:37PM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
SL Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
Because you don't always use a MUA when you send mails. Take the bug
package for example, which will help in sending a bug report. Without
such a rewrite, it will send the bug, using a bogus
SL == Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SL Then that is a bug with the software that is submitting the
SL incorrect header to the MTA and should be fixed.
This is no bug in the software. It sends the mail as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a valid address in my own
net. Clearly, this is not a
Steve Lamb writes:
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 04:03:37PM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
SL Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
Because you don't always use a MUA when you send mails. Take the bug
package for example, which will help in sending a bug report. Without
such a rewrite, it will send the
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 11:42:50PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
This is no bug in the software. It sends the mail as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a valid address in my own
net. Clearly, this is not a valid address, when the mails leaves my
net through my dialup link.
There is no reason for
16 matches
Mail list logo
