Hello.
In addition to the usual Unix permissions, the ext2 and ext3
filesystems offer a set of specific attributes that give you more
control over the files on your system.
What about ext4 and others?
Now that the capability has been removed from the system, an intruder
cannot change any
From: Kevin Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:30:11AM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After mounting, run
# chown storage.storage /home/storage/store
Hi Rajkiran,
it should be noted that when you give an instruction that is
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:30:11AM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using debian 4.0r1. I have an ext2 partition at /dev/hda1 and want to
mount
it at /home/storage/store. The /etc/fstab record I use is as follows:
/dev/hda1 /home/storage/storeext2
Hello,
I'm using debian 4.0r1. I have an ext2 partition at /dev/hda1 and want to mount
it at /home/storage/store. The /etc/fstab record I use is as follows:
/dev/hda1 /home/storage/storeext2 defaults 0 4
Before I mount it, the command ls -al /home/storage yields:
drwxr-xr-x 2
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:15:49PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drwxr-xr-x 2 storage storage 4096 2007-09-19 17:42 store
Which is of course empty. After the mount, which is successfull, the command
ls -al /home/storage yields:
drwxrwsr-x 10505505 4096 2007-09-21 16:03 store
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using debian 4.0r1. I have an ext2 partition at /dev/hda1 and
want to mount it at /home/storage/store. The /etc/fstab record I use
is as follows:
/dev/hda1 /home/storage/storeext2 defaults 0 4
@lists.debian.org
Subject: Mounting an ext2 filesystem at mount point with specific uid, gid
Hello,
I'm using debian 4.0r1. I have an ext2 partition at /dev/hda1 and want to mount
it at /home/storage/store. The /etc/fstab record I use is as follows:
/dev/hda1 /home/storage/storeext2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using debian 4.0r1. I have an ext2 partition at /dev/hda1 and want to mount
it at /home/storage/store. The /etc/fstab record I use is as follows:
/dev/hda1 /home/storage/storeext2 defaults 0 4
Before I mount it, the command ls -al /home/storage
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
modprobe pktcdvd
pktsetup /dev/pktcdvd0 /dev/hdd
ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Can anyone advise me on this?
Make sure that your kernel has pktcdvd support. Then try:
pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd
If you use udev, the device file /dev/pktcdvd/0 should
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
IIRC, you can only use iso9660 or udf filesystems on DVD or CD media.
Except for DVD-Ram media. I successfully use ext2 on DVD-Ram. :-)
Johannes
Me too :)
Wackojacko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
IIRC, you can only use iso9660 or udf filesystems on DVD or CD media.
Except for DVD-Ram media. I successfully use ext2 on DVD-Ram. :-)
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using Sarge with the 2.6.17 kernel from backports.org.
According to tidbits I have read on the Internet, DVD+RW
support was added to the kernel in 2.6.10, and I should be
able to make an file system on a DVD+RW with mke2fs.
However, it doesn't work:
mke2fs /dev/hdd
mke2fs 1.37
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:34:57PM -0500, Jack Dodds wrote:
I am using Sarge with the 2.6.17 kernel from backports.org.
According to tidbits I have read on the Internet, DVD+RW
support was added to the kernel in 2.6.10, and I should be
able to make an file system on a DVD+RW with mke2fs.
D On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:06:27PM -0500, Andrew Dixon wrote:
D | Hi All,
D | I'm looking for a filesystem to put on a some-what embedded system. I
D | was considering ext2 but IIRC there is a minimum 4K file size. Does
D I think that is a hardcoded block size that can be changed, if you are
the sectors on an ext2 filesystem but I don't know if these two
are connected).
Also if anyone has recommendations for a RAM based filesystem I'd love
to hear them too.
You can make the ext2 filesystem use 1k block sizes and that will knock the
minimum file size down too. The JFFS2
Hi All,
I'm looking for a filesystem to put on a some-what embedded system. I
was considering ext2 but IIRC there is a minimum 4K file size. Does
anyone know if that really is the limit (I also remember that you can
resize the sectors on an ext2 filesystem but I don't know if these two
/compiling the code. I could be wrong though.
| anyone know if that really is the limit (I also remember that you can
| resize the sectors on an ext2 filesystem but I don't know if these two
| are connected).
|
| Also if anyone has recommendations for a RAM based filesystem I'd love
| to hear them
filesystem but I don't know if these two
are connected).
Also if anyone has recommendations for a RAM based filesystem I'd love
to hear them too.
You can make the ext2 filesystem use 1k block sizes and that will knock the
minimum file size down too. The JFFS2 filesystem might be more what you
(I also remember that you can
resize the sectors on an ext2 filesystem but I don't know if these two
are connected).
4k is just the default blocksize - it can be set to be as small as 1k.
mke2fs -b 1024 other parameters
See man mke2fs for more information on other parameters.
Also if anyone
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
D-Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:06:27PM -0500, Andrew Dixon wrote:
| Hi All,
| I'm looking for a filesystem to put on a some-what embedded system. I
| was considering ext2 but IIRC there is a minimum 4K file size. Does
I think that is a
Hi all,
I'm gathering together 15 sparse 1GB files distributed in 5 PCs with
3 files each to get a 15GB block device. I'm using nbd 1.4 and raidtools
0.42 in linear mode. Kernel is 2.2.15
I intend to use the block device as a debian archive mirror but after
some amount of successful downloading
21 matches
Mail list logo
