On 01.07.09 21:59, lee wrote:
Well, I could live with that. But I just went with ext4 for the new
disks and made a new FS on /tmp to convert it to ext4. At some time
I might convert /var to ext4.
Unless I needed a really big /tmp, I've been using /tmp on tmpfs for years
(mfs on FreeBSD, tmpfs
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:53:43PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-06-30 20:40 +0200, lee wrote:
Anyway, getting the new disks brings up the question which file system
to use. It seems you can convert ext3 to ext4 later, so I'm thinking
of using ext3 for now and maybe converting later.
Hi,
is ext4 in kernel 2.6.30 stable enough to entrust it with data, or
should I better wait and stick with ext3?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:10, leel...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Hi,
is ext4 in kernel 2.6.30 stable enough to entrust it with data, or
should I better wait and stick with ext3?
It should be, that is why they marked it stable in .29. I don't know
that I would use it for business yet, but for
Am Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:10:58 -0600
schrieb lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de:
Hi,
is ext4 in kernel 2.6.30 stable enough to entrust it with data, or
should I better wait and stick with ext3?
I'm using ext4 since 2.6.28 and didn't have any problems with it.
Backups are always a good idea, not only
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:53, Andreas Juchdebian-u...@juch.cc wrote:
disks can fail too...
Yes, yes they can.
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:53:04PM +0200, Andreas Juch wrote:
Am Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:10:58 -0600
schrieb lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de:
Hi,
is ext4 in kernel 2.6.30 stable enough to entrust it with data, or
should I better wait and stick with ext3?
I'm using ext4 since 2.6.28 and didn't
On 2009-06-30 20:40 +0200, lee wrote:
Anyway, getting the new disks brings up the question which file system
to use. It seems you can convert ext3 to ext4 later, so I'm thinking
of using ext3 for now and maybe converting later. On the first glance,
there doesn't seem to be a disadvantage with
Am Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:53:43 +0200
schrieb Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de:
On 2009-06-30 20:40 +0200, lee wrote:
Anyway, getting the new disks brings up the question which file
system to use. It seems you can convert ext3 to ext4 later, so I'm
thinking of using ext3 for now and maybe
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:26, Andreas Juchdebian-u...@juch.cc wrote:
Am Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:53:43 +0200
schrieb Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de:
On 2009-06-30 20:40 +0200, lee wrote:
Anyway, getting the new disks brings up the question which file
system to use. It seems you can convert ext3
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, leel...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
It seems you can convert ext3 to ext4 later, so I'm thinking
of using ext3 for now and maybe converting later.
If you go this route, be sure you use a later kernel, .28+. .26 has
known issues with mixing extent/non-extent files
Am Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:40:56 -0700
schrieb Mike Castle dalgoda+deb...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, leel...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
It seems you can convert ext3 to ext4 later, so I'm thinking
of using ext3 for now and maybe converting later.
If you go this route, be sure
12 matches
Mail list logo
