Re: fetchmail troubles

2000-07-22 Thread Manoj Victor Mathew
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 02:48:05PM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote: As a normal user I type: fetchmail -v 21 | tee /tmp/fm.log [snip1] fetchmail: POP3 +OK [EMAIL PROTECTED] fetchmail: POP3 USER ciccio fetchmail: POP3 +OK ciccio gets mail here fetchmail: POP3 PASS * [snip2]

Re: fetchmail troubles

2000-07-22 Thread Christoph Simon
fetchmail: SMTP DATA fetchmail: SMTP 354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself Well, I think, it is the POP server that is to be blamed. A POP3 server is supposed to return the message followed by a CRLF and '.' when a TOP n or a RETR n is given. It that does not happen,

Re: fetchmail troubles

2000-07-22 Thread Manoj Victor Mathew
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 08:17:43AM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote: Well, I think, it is the POP server that is to be blamed. A POP3 server is supposed to return the message followed by a CRLF and '.' when a TOP n or a RETR n is given. It that does not happen, then a situation

fetchmail troubles

2000-07-21 Thread Christoph Simon
I'm experiencing odd problems retrieving my mail using fetchmail on debian frozen. No matter what options I give, the last message always hangs. The size of the message is correctly displayed, and I can see the message in /var/spool/mqueue, but it never ends, continuing sending just spaces, megas

Re: fetchmail troubles

2000-07-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:02:35AM -0500, Christopher Tessone wrote: Could you perhaps provide a little more information about your fetchmail setup and sendmail configuration? As for me, I've never had A trace of the session (ie, the output of fetchmail -v) would probably also be useful. I'm

Re: fetchmail troubles

2000-07-21 Thread Christoph Simon
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:02:35AM -0500, Christopher Tessone wrote: Could you perhaps provide a little more information about your fetchmail setup and sendmail configuration? As for me, I've never had A trace of the session (ie, the output of fetchmail -v) would probably also be

Re: fetchmail troubles

2000-07-21 Thread Chris Tessone
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 06:12:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: A trace of the session (ie, the output of fetchmail -v) would probably also be useful. I'm a bit concerned that you say that the SMTP server keeps your mailbox locked when things fail - it shouldn't be touching the mailbox until

Re: fetchmail troubles

2000-07-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 12:48:37PM -0500, Chris Tessone wrote: It seemed to me he meant that the server from which he's grabbing the mail is locking the file (on the remote server), not sendmail under Linux. Yeah - the POP server rather than the SMTP server. -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL

fetchmail troubles?

1997-05-10 Thread Ciccio
Hi, This afternoon I lost lots of mail messages. My ISP says this is due to my fetchmail and/or DNS and/or sendmail configuration. They told me some really strange stories, so I'd like to know if someone could help me understand. Until a week ago I was using popclient, specifying `arrakis.es' as

Re: fetchmail troubles?

1997-05-10 Thread Francis Swasey
On Sat, 10 May 1997, Ciccio wrote: pop.arrakis.es, which now is another box. So I touched my .fetchmailrc leaving it as this: poll pop.arrakis.es proto pop3 user ciccio pass * If that was your real

Re: fetchmail troubles?

1997-05-10 Thread Rick Jones
On Sat, 10 May 1997, Francis Swasey wrote: They explained me that---because of 37,000 users--- they had decided to use 1 RAID disk system with 2 computers which balance load, so that each time I call, pop.arrakis.es may point to another IP address. The confusion and data loss, according

Re: fetchmail troubles?

1997-05-10 Thread Ciccio
* If that was your real password, change it immediately. :-) `ni-Chufa' is spanish and means more or less like `nothing;' so it is not. Thanks to all replys; didn't expect anything else, but if somebody repeats so often the same thing, one starts to believe... The host names

Re: fetchmail troubles?

1997-05-10 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On Sat, 10 May 1997, Ciccio wrote: :-) `ni-Chufa' is spanish and means more or less like `nothing;' so it is not. Thanks to all replys; didn't expect anything else, but if somebody repeats so often the same thing, one starts to believe... The host names where real, 'cause maybe something