Re: fiddled with gcc/libc, now can't find stddef.h

1997-06-24 Thread Galen Hazelwood
Emilio Lopes wrote: The problem is that you have a version of cpp that's incompatible with gcc. They have to have the *same* version number. This is a *known* bug in the gcc package (it should have the right dependencies), but the gcc maintainer does not seem to think it's important

fiddled with gcc/libc, now can't find stddef.h

1997-06-23 Thread Tim Bell
Hi, I installed the latest gcc/libc5 (and other compiling tools) from unstable, had problems, so I've reinstalled the stable versions. But now I get: /usr/include/string.h:33: stddef.h: No such file or directory etc, despite the fact that /usr/include/linux/stddef.h exists. I'm sure

Re: fiddled with gcc/libc, now can't find stddef.h

1997-06-23 Thread Emilio Lopes
TB == Tim Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TB I installed the latest gcc/libc5 (and other compiling tools) from TB unstable, had problems, so I've reinstalled the stable TB versions. But now I get: TB /usr/include/string.h:33: stddef.h: No such file or directory TB etc, despite the fact that

Re: fiddled with gcc/libc, now can't find stddef.h

1997-06-23 Thread Tim Bell
Emilio Lopes wrote: TB == Tim Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TB I'm sure I've done something really stupid and obvious: can anyone TB point it out to me please? The problem is that you have a version of cpp that's incompatible with gcc. They have to have the *same* version number. I

Re: fiddled with gcc/libc, now can't find stddef.h

1997-06-23 Thread James Troup
Emilio Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is a *known* bug in the gcc package (it should have the right dependencies), but the gcc maintainer does not seem to think it's important enough to do a fix in stable. Look at the bug list for gcc at http://www.debian.org. Actually Galen fixed this

Re: fiddled with gcc/libc, now can't find stddef.h

1997-06-23 Thread Emilio Lopes
JT == James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think he should at least watch this list. JT I think it's unfair for you to demand (by implication) that every JT developer read debian.user, it's not low-volume and people only JT have a limited amount of time. Normally yes. But if you know there

Re: fiddled with gcc/libc, now can't find stddef.h

1997-06-23 Thread Emilio Lopes
TB == Tim Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem is that you have a version of cpp that's incompatible with gcc. They have to have the *same* version number. TB I don't think that's the problem. (I've been trying gcc/cpp TB 2.7.2.1-8 and gcc/cpp 2.7.2.2-5.) Exactly: cpp 2.7.2.*2* looks