On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 14:50:43 -0800, G. Crimp wrote:
The egcs versions of gcc and g++ are not both yet ready for prime
time. I may get corrected on this,
Indeed.
but I think it is gcc that still has some bugs,
Wrong. To quote /usr/doc/gcc/README.Debian:
:- FSF gcc 2.7.2.x provides
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 02:49:17PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
another gcc.
Do the 2.2 kernels compile with egcs?
As of somewhere in the 2.1 series Linux
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 02:49:17PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
another gcc.
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Debian uses eg++ for our g++ because 2.7 is effectively useless (it
encourages code that will not work on other C++ compilers) and we use 2.7
for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
another gcc. Effectively 2.7.* is dead and all development is
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:16:32 +0100, Conrado Badenas wrote:
What egcs means?
It used to mean Experimental GCC Compiler Suite, though AFAIK it's not
expanded anywhere on the EGCS website (http://egcs.cygnus.com) anymore.
If both gcc and egcs are developed by GNU, why they are missynchronized
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, fantumn (Steven Baker) wrote:
First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
It is mostly a matter of version
Somewhere in /usr/doc/gcc (sorry, don't remember exactly where) I
found a recommendation about
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 04:54:19PM -0500, fantumn Steven Baker wrote:
Hi Steve,
Glad to see you are still amongst the ranks of Debian users. I am
not the most knowledgable person on this subject, but when I say the name
fantumn, I couldn't resist answering. You might get a better
Okay, I don't want to start a holy war or anything here, but I have some
questions about egcs and gcc.
First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
(Note: when I say gcc, I mean gcc _and_ g++)
Compatibility: First, can egcs compile everything that gcc can? IE:
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, fantumn (Steven Baker) wrote:
Okay, I don't want to start a holy war or anything here, but I have some
questions about egcs and gcc.
First, was wondering _what_ the differences between gcc and egcs were.
It is mostly a matter of version
gcc 2.7.* has been used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:58:29 -0700 (MST), Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
for our gcc because nobody has patched the 2.0 kernels to work with
another gcc.
Do the 2.2 kernels compile with egcs?
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm
binWATVpeuW5K.bin
Description: Binary data
11 matches
Mail list logo
