Am 2007-03-24 10:46:15, schrieb Paul E Condon:
I've been following this thread precisely because I don't know how to
gain control over the email aspects of my Etch system.
Prior posts in this thread, indicated that getmail could be used as a
replacement for fetchmail. But, I have come to
Am 2007-03-27 07:26:20, schrieb Owen Heisler:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Paul Stolp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point ... can spam and viruses
be rejected at SMTP time with fetchmail?
SMTP? fetchmail is using POP3 to
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails
through an MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some filtering.
Getmail can do this on its own just fine (well not the actual
filtering, but then neither does exim/postfix), no need for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/07 10:06, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails
through an MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some filtering.
Getmail can do this on its own just fine
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/07 10:06, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails
through an MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some
Paul Stolp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
virus checking (I actually don't have that going
through exim.)
Perhaps I'm missing the point ... can spam and viruses
be rejected at SMTP time with fetchmail?
SMTP? fetchmail is using POP3 to
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Paul Stolp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
virus checking (I actually don't have that going
through exim.)
Perhaps I'm missing the point ... can spam and viruses
be rejected at
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Paul Stolp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
virus checking (I actually don't have that going
through exim.)
Perhaps I'm missing the
Benedict Verheyen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Andrei Popescu schreef:
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
Or does fetchmail
On 2007-03-26 17:49:38 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
Also, I was unconvinced by the reasoning of several posters that
they use fetchmail and have never been bothered by losing email: If
I were losing email, how would I know? [...]
If you don't receive anything, this may be an indication. FYI,
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 18:15 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:06 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Paul Stolp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that this would then use exim's spam and
virus checking (I actually don't have
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point you've been trying to make all through this thread is I
think starting to become clear to me (everyone cheer now), because I
didn't realize think about mail being scanned for spam before a full
message is received. Is it true that in the case
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 02:08 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point you've been trying to make all through this thread is I
think starting to become clear to me (everyone cheer now), because I
didn't realize think about mail being scanned for spam before
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Paul Stolp wrote:
[options]
verbose=1
unnecessary, default *is* 1
readall=1
That should be read_all and the default *is* true
delete=1
message_log=~/.getmail/getmail.log
[retriever]
type=SimplePOP3Retriever
server=.xxx
username=x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/07 18:08, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[snip]
What I don't think is optimal is to redirect *all* your mails through an
MTA like exim/postfix/... just to do some filtering. Getmail can do
this on its own just fine (well not the actual filtering,
* Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-27 18:45]:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:28:47PM -0500, Paul Stolp wrote:
[options]
verbose=1
unnecessary, default *is* 1
readall=1
That should be read_all and the default *is* true
Thanks, I'll try removing these lines.
I would think
Andrei Popescu schreef:
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
Or does fetchmail also do reinjection in a mail queue?
As I understand it, the
Benedict Verheyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrei Popescu schreef:
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how
this differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an
example case? Or does fetchmail also do reinjection in
* Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-26 17:00]:
Benedict Verheyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrei Popescu schreef:
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how
this differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:54:11AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
Andrei Popescu schreef:
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
Or does
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
Or does fetchmail also do reinjection in a mail queue?
As I understand it, the pop3/imap protocols were created to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/25/07 14:01, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) What is 'reinjection in a mail queue'? Where can I learn how this
differs from whatever is being done by fetchmail as an example case?
Or does fetchmail also do
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived to by
postfix. How can I configure getmail to deliver mail through postfix
or dovecot? I don't know what fetchmail does, but I don't think it
delivers directly to ~/.Maildir. Also, I haven't
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived to by
postfix. How can I configure getmail to deliver mail through postfix
or dovecot? I don't know what fetchmail does, but
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived to by
postfix. How can I configure getmail to deliver mail through
postfix or
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:03:22PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Owen Heisler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail is in ~/.Maildir, accessed by dovecot-imapd, delived to by
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 09:38 -0400, Celejar wrote:
I'm not much of an expert, but here's an excerpt from the getmail FAQ:
Why did you write getmail? Why not just use fetchmail?
Short answer: ... well, the short answer is mostly unprintable. The long
answer is ... well, long:
27 matches
Mail list logo
