At 2003-10-17T02:38:58Z, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's kinda cool. I use mysql for sympa and really don't want to have to
> convert that, nor do I have the patience to adapt it right now. It looks
> very promising though.
Thanks. I've had it running on production systems fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:04:29PM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I released this today; you may be interested:
>
> http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/NewTrino
That's kinda cool. I use mysql for sympa and really don't want to
have t
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:29:25AM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:18PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> | Hallo!
> |
> | * Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | [swen]
> | > Please report these just like spam (just remember you have to do it by
> | > hand and n
At 2003-10-16T10:28:07Z, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm glad you asked. Feel free to make a cron script to grab this handy,
> dandy net-lsearch-able list of relays I've found to have virus infected
> users behind them and put it in /etc/exim4/infected-hosts.txt
Paul,
I released
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Michael A. Miller wrote:
> > "Amal" == Amal Phadke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am currently using combination of Spamassassin and access
> > control via /etc/mail/access (I use sendmail) with good
> > success. Now "MS Patches" are d
My main work system is Windows 2000 Pro and I check my email with
Outlook XP through a corporate Exchange server.
There is no SPAM filtering being done on the Exchange servers as the
Messaging Group is horribly understaffed and has trouble keeping a
manager and they can't be bothered with extra pr
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:51, Michael A. Miller wrote:
> > "Amal" == Amal Phadke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am currently using combination of Spamassassin and access
> > control via /etc/mail/access (I use sendmail) with good
> > success. Now "MS Patches" are down to one or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:29:25AM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Paul is welcome to keep reporting the stuff he gets (say, if you want
> I'll redirect all the copies I get to you instead of the bit bucket)
No thanks, I get enough on my own.
>
> "Amal" == Amal Phadke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am currently using combination of Spamassassin and access
> control via /etc/mail/access (I use sendmail) with good
> success. Now "MS Patches" are down to one or two per
> day. Before I used to get about 80 or more in a d
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Eliot Stock wrote:
| After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning
| to find 40 helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
|
| How are other people dealing with this?
Join the club. My answer is in the archives and various parts of
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:18PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
| Hallo!
|
| * Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| [swen]
| > Please report these just like spam (just remember you have to do it by
| > hand and not via spamcop). I've been approaching 75% kill rate thanks
| > to cooperative ISPs.
Hallo!
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[swen]
> Please report these just like spam (just remember you have to do it by
> hand and not via spamcop). I've been approaching 75% kill rate thanks
> to cooperative ISPs.
Not everybody is online all the time. I've disabled my 'non local' SA
te
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:21:56PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 03:22:34 -0700
> Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I don't understand is, once I accidentally posted with my "real
> > email". Immediately, spam.
> >
> > I used to post with tb.nospam@, and didn't get any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:59:55PM +1000, James Mills wrote:
> And this often works ?
Amazingly enough, yes.
> I have myself tried to report infected users but gave up when I recieved
> no replies from the ISPs.
Report every instance. ISPs seem to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:21:56PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> I've wondered if it is the same for everyone, and that whoever is behind
> swen has access to MSs' mailing list?
No idea, there. But I'm amazed the Fed hasn't stuck it to Microsoft
for
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:30:10PM +1000, James Mills wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Eliot Stock wrote:
> > After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning
> > to find 40 helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
> >
> > How are other people dealing with th
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 03:22:34 -0700
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Eliot Stock wrote:
> > After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning
> > to find 40 helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
> >
> > How are other people dealing w
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Eliot Stock wrote:
> After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning to find 40
> helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
>
> How are other people dealing with this? Does the list consider this a problem,
> or is it just up to me to
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:35:15AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:30:10PM +1000, James Mills wrote:
> > What can we do besides spoof our email address ? Obviously it's already
> > too late for me :(
>
> Report virus propagators to the offending ISP. Take the last header
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:30:10PM +1000, James Mills wrote:
> What can we do besides spoof our email address ? Obviously it's already
> too late for me :(
Report virus propagators to the offending ISP. Take the last header
before it reaches your ISP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:58:36PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Unfortnatelly this will not prevent any 'real' spammer to get your
> emailadress. Both get caught by spamassassin, but real spammer at
> least don't sent 140kb...
Please report these just l
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Eliot Stock wrote:
> After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning to find 40
> helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
>
> How are other people dealing with this? Does the list consider this a problem,
> or is it just up to me to
Hi Eliot,
after posting the first time with a newly created email the day after I
received ~100 virus emails. I saw a least three different virus types.
Since I don't want to download all these mails (got a slow connection) I
installed a filter at GMX (my email provider) which says 'Delete ever
Hallo!
* Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I don't understand is, once I accidentally posted with my "real
> email". Immediately, spam.
Me too :( Another mailadress burned. F**k
> I used to post with tb.nospam@, and didn't get any spam for a
> couple months. Then, one. So I switched, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please adjust your word wrap to 72 columns to allow for quoting.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Eliot Stock wrote:
> After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning
> to find 40 helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Eliot Stock wrote:
> After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning to find 40
> helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
>
> How are other people dealing with this? Does the list consider this a problem,
> or is it just up to me to
After my first post to this list last night, I woke up this morning to find 40
helpful "MS security updates" in my inbox.
How are other people dealing with this? Does the list consider this a problem,
or is it just up to me to fight this at my server? If so a pointer to any URLs
that lay out all t
27 matches
Mail list logo
