>
> Hi debian-user readers,
>
> I'm running testing, which I believe is based on glibc2.2. Is this
> backwards compatible with glibc2.1? If a program says it requires 2.1,
> should I expect that it will work?
most of the time..sometimes it wont..depends how the program
was coded, and compiled
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 06:20:02PM -0700, David Steinberg wrote:
>
> Hi debian-user readers,
>
> Something I've been wondering for a while, and now I really need to
> know: how do glibc versions relate?
>
> I'm running testing, which I believe is based on glibc2.2. Is this
> backwards compatibl
Hi debian-user readers,
Something I've been wondering for a while, and now I really need to
know: how do glibc versions relate?
I'm running testing, which I believe is based on glibc2.2. Is this
backwards compatible with glibc2.1? If a program says it requires 2.1,
should I expect that it will
3 matches
Mail list logo
