On Mon 11 May 2020 at 15:26:11 (-0400), Default User wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:20 AM David Wright
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. I hadn't realised the d-i would do that by default. (I've
> > never used it to actually partition a disk, but only to allow the
> > partitioner to rewrite the
On Sat, May 09, 2020, at 22:34:30, Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
> UUID is the preferred method for automating such stuff[1], because they
> are (for all practical purposes) unique, so it ensures there won't be
> conflicts even when swapping drives between systems.
>
> Labels are more convenient for
On Fri 08 May 2020 at 22:34:30 (-0400), Default User wrote:
> On 2020-05-08, David Wright (deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk) wrote:
>
> > But I'm surprised: which partitioner did you use, and which installer?
>
> David, I Originally installed Debian as Stable using the Debian 9
> netinst installer, a
On Vi, 08 mai 20, 22:34:30, Default User wrote:
>
> Anyway, are labels even needed anymore? These days everyone and
> everything wants to use UUID numbers for partitions, to the seeming
> exclusion of all else.
UUID is the preferred method for automating such stuff[1], because they
are (for
On 2020-05-08, Cindy Sue Causey (butterflyby...@gmail.com) wrote:
> My question is: Is that the only hard drive with partitions named like
> that? Just ruling out that maybe there's some kind of conflict if two
> hard drives have the same layout..
Cindy, there is only one drive in the computer,
On Fri 08 May 2020 at 16:48:52 (-0400), Default User wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020, 12:34 Tixy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 09:59 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, I made the labels for the partitions during the original
> > > installation:
> > >
> > > /dev/sda1 = / (primary
On Fri, May 8, 2020, 12:34 Tixy wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 09:59 -0400, Default User wrote:
> > Hi David.
> >
> > Yes, I made the labels for the partitions during the original
> > installation:
> >
> > /dev/sda1 = / (primary partition)
> > /dev/sda2 = (extended partition)
> > /dev/sda5
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 09:59 -0400, Default User wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> Yes, I made the labels for the partitions during the original
> installation:
>
> /dev/sda1 = / (primary partition)
> /dev/sda2 = (extended partition)
> /dev/sda5 = swap (logical partition)
> /dev/sda6 = /home (logical
On 5/8/20, Default User wrote:
> Yes, I made the labels for the partitions during the original
> installation:
>
> /dev/sda1 = / (primary partition)
> /dev/sda2 = (extended partition)
> /dev/sda5 = swap (logical partition)
> /dev/sda6 = /home (logical partition)
>
> So /dev/sda2 has no
Hi David.
Yes, I made the labels for the partitions during the original installation:
/dev/sda1 = / (primary partition)
/dev/sda2 = (extended partition)
/dev/sda5 = swap (logical partition)
/dev/sda6 = /home (logical partition)
So /dev/sda2 has no label, as it is just an extended
Not using a DE, I might not be much help, sorry.
But you aroused my curiosity…
On Thu 07 May 2020 at 20:46:32 (-0400), Default User wrote:
> blkid output:
>
> /dev/sda1: LABEL="/" UUID="1af49d67-02c1-4601-b020-ca70e78e6da8"
> BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="cff3c8f8-01"
> /dev/sda5:
Hi.
I am using Debian Unstable (64-bit), Cinnamon desktop environment.
---
lsblk output:
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:00 111.8G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1028G 0 part /
├─sda2 8:20 1K 0
12 matches
Mail list logo
