Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port)

On Friday 09 June 2017 10:47:29 Nicolas George wrote: > Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit : > > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to > > All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are > > answering. > > This recommendation is

Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port)

UTC Time: June 9, 2017 2:47 PM From: geo...@nsup.org To: Charlie Kravetz debian-user@lists.debian.org Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit : > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to > All", since that sends individual

Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port)

Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit : > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to > All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are > answering. This recommendation is unsustainable and should be eliminated from the guidelines. It only

Re: https_port

my apologies if it is so. > >I'm not talking about NTP, in fact I do not know what it is. > >Yesterday I sent my question hbaia with the subject https_port but >when I answered I did not know how it was to respond again and what I did >was create an email and send it to

Re: https_port

esterday I sent my question hbaia with the subject https_port but > when I answered I did not know how it was to respond again and what I > did was create an email and send it to the list with the subject Re: > https_port. > This was the one that wanted to respond > Http://lists.s

Re: https_port

I just do not understand how to respond in the list, maybe I did wrong and that's why they are confused, I beg my apologies if it is so. I'm not talking about NTP, in fact I do not know what it is. Yesterday I sent my question hbaia with the subject https_port but when I answered I did

Re: https_port

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:34:20AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:18:16AM -0700, Adiel Plasencia Herrera wrote: > Hello, > I do not look for security, is that having no real internet ip in my > company I

Re: https_port

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:18:16AM -0700, Adiel Plasencia Herrera wrote: > > Hello, > > I do not look for security, is that having no real internet ip in my > > company I need certain programs to go to the internet and for that I >

Re: https_port

will be able to give better advice. A friend told me that for https_port to work I needed validated certificates, not self-generated ones. I do not know to what extent this has to be so because the configuration I need is customized for me only and would be internal to my company that does

Re: https_port

need to pass my squid to use HTTPS authentication for the program (proxycap) to work well. A friend told me that for https_port to work I needed validated certificates, not self-generated ones. I do not know to what extent this has to be so because the configuration I need is customized for me

Re: https_port

On Thu, 08 Jun 2017, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 08:41:14AM -0700, Adiel Plasencia Herrera wrote: > >How to generate the certificate and the key to make a very > >basic configuration of the https connection. > > NTP doesn't use HTTPS. It uses its own port, it's own protocol and

Re: https_port

applications are you wanting to use this proxy connection? The normal configuration is simply to add an https_port line with cert= parameter to your squid.conf. More details on that below. > > > This is my current configuration: > acl trabajadores src 10.5.7.3 10.5.7.5 > > &g

Re: https_port

re you wanting to use this proxy connection? The normal configuration is simply to add an https_port line with cert= parameter to your squid.conf. More details on that below. >>>This is my current configuration:>acl trabajadores src 10.5.7.3 10.5.7.5> >>http_access allow trabajadore