Am 23.03.2011 14:31, schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.:
I recommend a complex pinning setup like mine so you can pull individual
packages from backports/testing/unstable/experimental and keep them up to
date
while having as many packages as possible sourced from stable.
Or just make usage of
Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:52:08AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:01 AM, Brad Alexander wrote:
Too soon?
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I
On 03/29/2011 08:49 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:52:08AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:01 AM, Brad Alexander wrote:
Too soon?
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but
decided
against that for a squeeze system.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:58:47AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/29/2011 08:49 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Freeman wrote:
I missed that. But I wonder if the industry listened...
MSFT sure didn't. But they still use it as a FUD bludgeon against
switching away from Windows.
Ah yes,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:52:08AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:01 AM, Brad Alexander wrote:
Too soon?
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge
On 26/03/11 13:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/25/2011 06:19 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 26/03/11 08:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 08:41 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 25/03/11 03:10, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 10:21 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Fri 25 Mar 2011 at 19:10:47 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
'Edit, Preferences, General' doesn't offer you a startup option Show
my windows and tabs from last time? Mine does.
It does and I've now set it to that. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sat 26 Mar 2011 at 10:34:36 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Both Iceweasel4 and Firefox4, on both Lenny and Squeeze do for me. I run
KDE (3x and 4x respectively).
It was my misunderstanding of the Startup options which perplexed me a
little. Everything is sorted now. Thanks.
--
To
Ron Johnson wrote:
I *found* it, but it had moved for no reason. Like a wife that
rearranges the furniture for no reason except I was bored.
Gotta agree with that one! The same problems arose with MS Office
updates, the earlier versions were easy to work with, the newer
updated versions
On 26/03/11 14:37, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
I *found* it, but it had moved for no reason. Like a wife that
rearranges the furniture for no reason except I was bored.
Gotta agree with that one! The same problems arose with MS Office
updates, the earlier versions were easy to
On 03/26/2011 07:18 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 26/03/11 13:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
Most probably. A similar addon (Old Location Bar) makes FF3.x tolerable.
Do you mean it puts location bar above tabs?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/old-location-bar/
Causes
On 27/03/11 07:56, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/26/2011 07:18 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 26/03/11 13:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
Most probably. A similar addon (Old Location Bar) makes FF3.x
tolerable.
Do you mean it puts location bar above tabs?
On 03/26/2011 08:20 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
I was referring to the most obvious UI change between 3x and 4x - that
the tabs now appear above the location bar (which means the addons tab
obscures the location bar).
Right click on the tabs bar and mark tabs on bottom.
--
The Illiterati
On 27/03/11 10:50, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On 03/26/2011 08:20 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
I was referring to the most obvious UI change between 3x and 4x - that
the tabs now appear above the location bar (which means the addons tab
obscures the location bar).
Right click on the tabs bar
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 10:21 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge that you
install FF 4.0 to /usr/local/bin or ~/bin, since you or your wife might
(as I do) dislike the way that v4 works.
I've been using it for a couple of weeks now, and I don't have a problem
with it. The only issue, as with all ffx releases is the lag in my favorite
add-ons catching up.
I believe that she will be happy being able to do slideshows and mmedia
without having to open another browser...
--b
On
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 10:21 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge that you
install FF 4.0 to /usr/local/bin or ~/bin, since you or your wife might
(as I do) dislike the way that v4 works.
On 03/24/2011 08:41 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 25/03/11 03:10, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 10:21 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge that you
install FF 4.0 to /usr/local/bin or ~/bin, since you
On Fri 25 Mar 2011 at 14:45:52 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
and it does not offer to save my setup anymore, so after I quit I have
to start all over gain... POC
Mine doesn't offer to save open tabs either but on restarting it does
present a Google search field and the option to restore the
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Fri 25 Mar 2011 at 14:45:52 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
and it does not offer to save my setup anymore, so after I quit I have
to start all over gain... POC
Mine doesn't offer to save open tabs either but on restarting
On 26/03/11 08:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 08:41 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 25/03/11 03:10, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 10:21 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge that you
install FF 4.0
On 26/03/11 09:41, Brian wrote:
On Fri 25 Mar 2011 at 14:45:52 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
and it does not offer to save my setup anymore, so after I quit I have
to start all over gain... POC
Mine doesn't offer to save open tabs either but on restarting it does
present a Google search
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 02:57:38 pm Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:44 +
Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and
upgraded, but
On 03/25/2011 06:19 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 26/03/11 08:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 08:41 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 25/03/11 03:10, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/24/2011 10:21 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
Because of the radical changes in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Sciame wrote:
This is confusing. There is 'backports.debian.org' and 'mozilla.debian.net'.
Both
use squeeze-backports in sources.list.
apt-get install -t squeeze-backports iceweasel, on my box, points to
backports.debian.net, I
On 2011-03-23, Andreas Rönnquist gus...@gusnan.se wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:44 +
Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and upgraded,
but got
On 2011-03-24, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
--20cf30291d1a343b4f049f2f83f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't think it would give you the already at the newest version error if
it was a server load issue. It looks like
On 2011-03-24 04:03:27 Ken Heard wrote:
Steven Sciame wrote:
This is confusing. There is 'backports.debian.org' and
'mozilla.debian.net'. Both use squeeze-backports in sources.list.
apt-get install -t squeeze-backports iceweasel, on my box, points to
backports.debian.net, I haven't added
On 03/23/2011 07:01 AM, Brad Alexander wrote:
Too soon?
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge that you
install FF 4.0 to /usr/local/bin or ~/bin, since you or
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge that you
install FF 4.0 to /usr/local/bin or ~/bin, since you or your wife might
(as I do) dislike the way that v4 works.
Care to elaborate on what you dislike about it?
--
Tony van der Hoff
On 20110324_160327, Ken Heard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Sciame wrote:
This is confusing. There is 'backports.debian.org' and
'mozilla.debian.net'. Both
use squeeze-backports in sources.list.
apt-get install -t squeeze-backports iceweasel, on
On 03/24/2011 10:21 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 24/03/11 14:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
Because of the radical changes in v4.0, I *strongly* urge that you
install FF 4.0 to /usr/local/bin or ~/bin, since you or your wife might
(as I do) dislike the way that v4 works.
Care to elaborate on
On 2011-03-24 11:04:02 Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20110324_160327, Ken Heard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Sciame wrote:
This is confusing. There is 'backports.debian.org' and
'mozilla.debian.net'. Both use squeeze-backports in sources.list.
apt-get
.
I'm not sure what was broken in earlier versions (from my perspective).
While the UI has some small changes - and it seems to run quicker, I'm
yet to see any reason to migrate from 3.x to 4.x.
Note: I'm referring above to Iceweasel 4 on Squeeze, and Firefox 4 on
Lenny - I run a number of add-ons
Too soon?
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
--b
On 2011-03-23 07:01:21 Brad Alexander wrote:
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
Squeeze is released, which mean it will no longer receive new upstream
versions. Updates will be limited to security issues and important
On 23 March 2011 13:31, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On 2011-03-23 07:01:21 Brad Alexander wrote:
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
You may want to try http://mozilla.debian.net/
Peter
--
On 23.3.2011 14:01, Brad Alexander wrote:
Too soon?
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
--b
I've used the original package from Mozilla and installed it in /opt. Works
fine...
--
Juha Tuuna
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I've tried «apt-get install -t experimental iceweasel» first, but
sounded better to me as «aptitude install --with-recommends -t
experimental iceweasel-l10n-pt-br»!
Atenciosamente,
Leonardo Ruoso (CE1921JP)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
Peter Tynan wrote:
On 23 March 2011 13:31, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On 2011-03-23 07:01:21 Brad Alexander wrote:
I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided
against that for a squeeze system.
You may want to try
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and upgraded,
but got
[root@galaxy sources.list.d]# apt-get install -t squeeze-backports iceweasel
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
iceweasel is already the newest version.
0
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and upgraded,
but got
[root@galaxy sources.list.d]# apt-get install -t squeeze-backports iceweasel
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and
upgraded,
but got
[root@galaxy sources.list.d]# apt-get install -t
I did.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and
It's my wife's workstation, I may just go straight to wheezy or sid.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
I did.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Peter Tynan
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 09:01:45 am Peter Tynan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and
upgraded,
but got
This is confusing. There is 'backports.debian.org' and 'mozilla.debian.net'.
Both
use squeeze-backports in sources.list.
apt-get install -t squeeze-backports iceweasel, on my box, points to
backports.debian.net, I haven't added the mozilla.debian.net to my sources yet
as
this would be
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:44 +
Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and upgraded,
but got
[root@galaxy sources.list.d]# apt-get install -t
On 23 March 2011 22:57, Andreas Rönnquist gus...@gusnan.se wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:44 +
Peter Tynan peter.ty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and upgraded,
but got
I don't think it would give you the already at the newest version error if
it was a server load issue. It looks like it's not even going out to the
site, its checking its version and leaving satisfied.
I thought it might be that the version was called something like iceweasel-4
but that wasn't to
50 matches
Mail list logo
