Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew

Am 08.01.2024 um 13:01:38 Uhr schrieb Andreas B: > I haven't checked thoroughly (yet), but the only immediate difference > I can see, is that the router lifetime is 600 seconds (RA). My ISP's > router used a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24h), I think. That affect when the old addresses must be

Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew

A follow up on this. I recently swapped my ISP's router with my own. New temp-addresses are now generated when old ones become deprecated, as expected. I haven't checked thoroughly (yet), but the only immediate difference I can see, is that the router lifetime is 600 seconds (RA). My ISP's

Re: Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew

Arno, Thank you so much for your prompt response. Very interesting that it's working as expected for you. At least I can isolate the problem to being local for my network. I asked about this in #debian on irc, and it was suggested that I check if I use dhcpv6 or dhcpv6-pd. I'm not 100% into

Re: ipv6: temp address does not renew

Hi Andreas, Am 26.06.2023 um 11:13 schrieb Andreas B: Hi, I'm very puzzled by the behaviour of ipv6 temp addresses on Debian 12. Expected behaviour: as soon as a temp address becomes deprecated, a new one is generated. This is the behaviour on Debian 11. Reasonable expectation, I think.

ipv6: temp address does not renew

Hi, I'm very puzzled by the behaviour of ipv6 temp addresses on Debian 12. Expected behaviour: as soon as a temp address becomes deprecated, a new one is generated. This is the behaviour on Debian 11. What actually happens: When the (first) temp address becomes deprecated (in my case, this