on the differences between the
various kernel source packages in the repository,
kernel-source-* are for sarge and below
linux-source-* are for etch and beyond
Then do
apt-cache show $PACKAGE
and read the Description:
(for example, difference between linux-source-2.6.18 and linux-tree-2.6.18
also sprach Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.04.14.0252 +0200]:
The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
but I can't find a 'kernel-source-anything'..
Try linux-source-*. The kernel packaging has changed substantially
since my book was
Can anyone shed any light on the differences between the
various kernel source packages in the repository, and which is
the best choice for just being able to reproduce the running kernel?
The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
but I can't find
Can anyone shed any light on the differences between
the various kernel source packages in the
repository,
and which is the best choice for just being able to
reproduce the running kernel?
The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
but I
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:52:41AM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
Can anyone shed any light on the differences between the
various kernel source packages in the repository,
kernel-source-* are for sarge and below
linux-source-* are for etch and beyond
Then do
apt-cache show $PACKAGE
and read
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when
building a custom kernel?
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would one
need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when building a
custom kernel?
It's already
Quoting Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch it with all of the included debian patches when
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:15:08 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
On 08/28/2007 02:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 08/28/2007 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there is a source package for the kernel and a package of
debian patches. Has the kernel source already been patched or would
one need to patch it
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the mirror
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:08:28 -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror
On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:41, Florian Kulzer wrote:
If your package manager lists these packages as upgradable then you
either have not run update in a while or the progeny mirror is
seriously broken or you have found a bug in the package manager.
I had the same problem in Etch a few days
On Monday 16 October 2006 02:08, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Robert Baldwin wrote:
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org
http://us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and
nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the
mirror). however the
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:05:39PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the
On Mon October 16 2006 06:47 am, David Baron wrote:
Yes, they are closed but the drivers are apparently the same. The glx
maybe not. I get much better results with those on Nvidia's site than those
on Sid. I keep the Sid nvidia-kernel-source package around because when
this is upgrades, so is
Robert Baldwin wrote:
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org
http://us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and
nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the
mirror). however the nvidia-glx-legacy and nvidia-kernel-legacy-source
packages are
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the mirror pulse to finish. You
On Monday 16 October 2006 01:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the mirror). however the nvidia-glx-legacy and nvidia-kernel-legacy-source packages are there. when i viewed this mirror with firefox, sarge
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 01:15, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Olle Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
that is some discussion from 1997 concluding
Hi
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no difference except
that the debian packages handles the /usr/src/linux symlink for you.
Sorry
Hello Olle!
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Olle Eriksson wrote:
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
The README.Debian lists several changes, including additions, patches
Olle Eriksson wrote:
Hi
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
difference except that the debian packages handles the /usr/src
Olle Eriksson wrote:
Hi
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no difference except
that the debian packages handles the /usr/src/linux
Hello
Olle Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
difference except that the debian packages
On 2004-02-19, Olle Eriksson penned:
Hi
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
difference except that the debian packages handles
The differance between vanilla kernels and debian kernels is that Debian
a) removes stuff it believes to not be sufficiently free - something
about patches to eeproms
b) adds some patches - e.g. some additional network card drivers
Also in my experiance they don't create the /usr/src/linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul J. Keenan) wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
What am I missing?
No,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
What am I missing?
No, kernel-source doesn't provide kernel headers. However, if
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
What am I missing?
No, kernel-source doesn't provide kernel headers.
It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides kernel-headers.
Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
What am I missing?
--
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An elephant is a mouse with an operating system.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
What am I missing?
No, kernel-source doesn't provide kernel headers. However, if you
install kernel-package you'll be able to use
I know this is documented somewhere. I've seen it. Unfortunately, I
can't figure out where I've seen it.
What patches are applied to the pristine kernel source to make the
distributed Debian kernel-source packages? And where do they come
from? And where is this documented?
--
I get my monkeys
38 matches
Mail list logo
