> I was confused about libs. Now I think I understand. For instance, if I
> use
> gcc, I must use libc5 or libc6 depending upon whether gcc was compiled using
> libc5 or libc6 respectively. Is this correct?
Well, it's correct in the sence that it is happens to be true for most of
the Debian
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm afraid I don't quite understand your question. The kernel
> does nothing special for libc6 dependent stuff. As long as you have
> the shared library installed, the executables that depend on them
> will work, even with older kernels.
>
> The
Hi,
I'm afraid I don't quite understand your question. The kernel
does nothing special for libc6 dependent stuff. As long as you have
the shared library installed, the executables that depend on them
will work, even with older kernels.
The kernel has nothing to do with the loca
Hello,
How does one compile a kernel that supports libc6 dependent packages using
kernel-package v-3.5 ?
Or else if not using kernel-package, how does one do this?
I'm using packages with libc6 dependencies now and for the most part they seem
to work OK except for the locales package which choke
4 matches
Mail list logo
