Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:So what is the ksmbfs pkg for anyway?
:
: I think that the ksmbfs stuff got merged in samba a few versions
: back. Perhaps the ksmbfs package will disappear eventually.
To summarize:
Package samba: it allows to convert your Linux box in a SMB server
. Thanks. Linux box reaches out across the Ethernet and
grabs files from the windoze95 machines just fine.
I was under the (apparently false) impression that ksmbfs was sufficient
if all you wanted was a smb client on the Linux box, that Samba was
necessary only if you wanted a smb server.
So what
That works great. Thanks. Linux box reaches out across the Ethernet and
grabs files from the windoze95 machines just fine.
I was under the (apparently false) impression that ksmbfs was sufficient
if all you wanted was a smb client on the Linux box, that Samba was
necessary only
and talked accross the Ethernet just fine. Thanks.
Now, I had the impression that ksmbfs was all you needed if you just
wanted a smb client, not a server, on a Linux box. What is the purpose of
the ksmbfs pkg?
Richard B. Talley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The power of the Web is in its universality.
Access
Howdy,
I wanted to add a Linux box to my home network so I dragged out an old 386
and downloaded the latest stable Debian release.
I enabled smb support when I installed the kernal.
Installation and smoke test went fine.
I used dselect to install the ksmbfs pkg. (I want to mount some of my
On Sat, 14 Feb 1998, Richard B. Talley wrote:
: I can't find smbclient or smbmount anywhere on the system. I've been
: through all the FAQ's and HOWTO's.
Try the samba package:
hamm/hamm/binary-i386/net/samba_1.9.18p2-1.deb
bye,
Remco
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the
On Mon, Dec 15, 1997 at 04:16:17PM +, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
I started to maintain ksmbfs that is now called smbfs. Last week I
uploaded the libc6 version.
However, I don't know anything about the 2.1 kernels. For me, it is
too bloody to be in the bleeding edge of kernel development. I
[I am Cc'ing Bill Hawes just in case he is interested]
At 05:26 PM 12/16/97 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Thanks for your reply Eloy.
No problem. I like to know and keep up with any problems with the packages
I maintain.
Who is changing the kernel driver and not keeping the userland utilities
Eloy A. Paris wrote:
Who is changing the kernel driver and not keeping the userland utilities
up to date? Unfortunately this happens all too often with Linux.
I think it is Bill Hawes. I know he has been dealing with the userland
utilities but development is so fast that is hard to keep
Has anyone else had kernel SMB fs support working
with recent 2.1 kernels and the ksmbfs package (2.0.1-2)?
It says
smb_read_super: need mount version 6
and gives up for me.
thanks,
Hamish
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble
Hi,
I started to maintain ksmbfs that is now called smbfs. Last week I
uploaded the libc6 version.
However, I don't know anything about the 2.1 kernels. For me, it is
too bloody to be in the bleeding edge of kernel development. I know
that Volcker Lendecke is too busy these days to take a look
On Sat, 28 Sep 1996, Jim Pick wrote:
smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
is there a way to fix this problem
You can compile the kernel to use long file names. This is an
experimental feature. One problem though - it doesn't work!!
There are some major bugs
smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
is there a way to fix this problem
-thanks
Oz
--
NAME Oz Dror, Santa Monica, California
EMAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux since 8/15/94
PHONE Fax (310) 396-5798
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
is there a way to fix this problem
-thanks
Oz
You can compile the kernel to use long file names. This is an
experimental feature. One problem though - it doesn't work!!
There are some major bugs in the implementation.
14 matches
Mail list logo
