Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-08 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Rob van der Putten wrote: More weirdness: I can start inputattach as root, but not as a normal user using a suid script. The thing to do is to write a start script and start the mouse just _after_ XDM. This works both with and without .legacy-bootordering. I'll put more info on

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-05 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Rob van der Putten wrote: asterisk is not in /etc/init.d/.depend.* 'insserv /etc/init.d/asterisk' fixed this One would expect this to run on install. Regards, Rob -- Alphabet soup sux. Specify your charset; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojibake#Example -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-05 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Andrei POPESCU wrote: Yes it is. Why do you expect this to be a problem? More weirdness: I can start inputattach as root, but not as a normal user using a suid script. Regards, Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-04 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Rob van der Putten wrote: Tom H wrote: Do the logs say why? Nothing. If not, check how the scripts are numbered with and without legacy ordering to figure out what asterisk's Required-Start and Should-Start might be missing. I'll try. asterisk is not in

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-04 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Tom H wrote: AFAIUI, $remote_fs being Required-Start for bind9 means that nfs volumes have to be mounted for bind9 to be started not that nfs-kernel-server's shares have to be exported. This box does both. Regards, Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-04 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Rob van der Putten r...@sput.nl wrote: Tom H wrote: AFAIUI, $remote_fs being Required-Start for bind9 means that nfs volumes have to be mounted for bind9 to be started not that nfs-kernel-server's shares have to be exported. This box does both. It dosn't

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-03 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Andrei POPESCU wrote: ~/.xsessionrc If I understand correctly this stuff is sourced, not run. Regards, Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-03 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Rob van der Putten wrote: Tom H wrote: Why a circular dependency? You're adding it to nfs-kernel-server not to bind9. '$remote_fs' confused me. '/etc/insserv.conf' cleared things up. Actually I'm still confused. From /etc/insserv.conf; # # All remote filesystems are mounted

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-03 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Tom H wrote: Do the logs say why? Nothing. If not, check how the scripts are numbered with and without legacy ordering to figure out what asterisk's Required-Start and Should-Start might be missing. I'll try. Regards, Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-03 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-12-03 16:47 +0100, Rob van der Putten wrote: Rob van der Putten wrote: Tom H wrote: Why a circular dependency? You're adding it to nfs-kernel-server not to bind9. '$remote_fs' confused me. '/etc/insserv.conf' cleared things up. Actually I'm still confused. From

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-03 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 03 dec 12, 16:39:33, Rob van der Putten wrote: Andrei POPESCU wrote: ~/.xsessionrc If I understand correctly this stuff is sourced, not run. Yes it is. Why do you expect this to be a problem? Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-03 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Rob van der Putten r...@sput.nl wrote: Rob van der Putten wrote: Tom H wrote: Why a circular dependency? You're adding it to nfs-kernel-server not to bind9. '$remote_fs' confused me. '/etc/insserv.conf' cleared things up. Actually I'm still confused.

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-02 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Tom H wrote: You can use an insserv override to add Should-Start: $named Should-Stop: $named to the nfs-kernel-server LSB headers to ensure that bind starts before nfs. The bind9 script says: Provides: bind9 I assume this is somehow translated into: Provides:

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-02 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Rob van der Putten wrote: The bind9 script says: Provides: bind9 I assume this is somehow translated into: Provides: named. Where can I find more on this subject. How do I check that adding 'Should-Start: $named' and 'Should-Stop: $named' won't introduce a circular dependency?

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-02 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Rob van der Putten r...@sput.nl wrote: Tom H wrote: You can use an insserv override to add Should-Start: $named Should-Stop: $named to the nfs-kernel-server LSB headers to ensure that bind starts before nfs. The bind9 script says: Provides: bind9

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-02 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Rob van der Putten r...@sput.nl wrote: Rob van der Putten wrote: I just found out: Without .legacy-bootordering asterisk won't start. Do the logs say why? If not, check how the scripts are numbered with and without legacy ordering to figure out what asterisk's

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-02 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there Tom H wrote: Why a circular dependency? You're adding it to nfs-kernel-server not to bind9. '$remote_fs' confused me. '/etc/insserv.conf' cleared things up. Provides: bind9 means that the bind9 init script provides the bind9 boot facility. bind9 is one of the facilities that

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-12-02 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 02 dec 12, 16:26:46, Rob van der Putten wrote: This still leaves me with my X + mouse problem. Is there a (standard) way to run a script when starting X? ~/.xsessionrc Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Re: legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-11-30 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Rob van der Putten r...@sput.nl wrote: When Upgrading from Lenny to Squeeze I run into trouble because NFS wanted to mount before Bind was running. legacy-bootordering fixed this for me. You can use an insserv override to add Should-Start: $named Should-Stop:

legacy-bootordering in Wheezy?

2012-11-29 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi Does wheezy support /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering? When Upgrading from Lenny to Squeeze I run into trouble because NFS wanted to mount before Bind was running. legacy-bootordering fixed this for me. I also use legacy-bootordering on my GUI box: I use /etc/rc.local to start