Re: libraries have no symbols

1998-09-21 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
On Sat, Sep 19, 1998 at 05:31:31PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 01:14:30AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: Why do the system libraries not have symbols? They do have some symbols in them. Try e.g. nm --dynamic --defined-only /lib/libc.so.6 Hmmm, okay. So

Re: libraries have no symbols

1998-09-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Sep 19, 1998 at 05:31:31PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 01:14:30AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: Why do the system libraries not have symbols? They do have some symbols in them. Try e.g. nm --dynamic --defined-only /lib/libc.so.6 Hmmm, okay. So why

libraries have no symbols

1998-09-19 Thread Hamish Moffatt
some Motif stuff. Why do the system libraries not have symbols? /lib/libc.so.1 on Solaris 2.6 certainly has symbols! And gdb uses them too. thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP

Re: libraries have no symbols

1998-09-19 Thread jdassen
On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 01:14:30AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: Why do the system libraries not have symbols? They do have some symbols in them. Try e.g. nm --dynamic --defined-only /lib/libc.so.6 Ray -- ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old. I'd