You wouldn't happend to have built the same drivers against 2.4.18bf kernel?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* mixo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040519 01:54]:
> You wouldn't happend to have built the same drivers against 2.4.18bf kernel?
No, but afaik there are working official packages for 2.4 kernels. You
might have to "upgrade" to a standard kernel (rather than the bf kernel,
I mean). I'd bet they're all b
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 12:42:44AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
} Gregory Seidman wrote:
[...]
} > I believe the linux-wlan-ng stuff has been orphaned. If you felt like
} > taking it over, I'm sure you would help a lot of people.
}
} It was orphaned, but Bradley Bell tool it over recently.
Oh, excelle
Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:24:48PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> } I built a linux-wlan-ng modules package against the stock Debian
> } 2.6.6-1-686 kernel package. I used the 0.2.1pre21 source package from
> } the linux-wlan-ng project and the debian build directory from Bra
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:24:48PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
} I built a linux-wlan-ng modules package against the stock Debian
} 2.6.6-1-686 kernel package. I used the 0.2.1pre21 source package from
} the linux-wlan-ng project and the debian build directory from Bradley
} Bell's official linux-wl
Hey everyone,
I built a linux-wlan-ng modules package against the stock Debian
2.6.6-1-686 kernel package. I used the 0.2.1pre21 source package from
the linux-wlan-ng project and the debian build directory from Bradley
Bell's official linux-wlan-ng 0.2.0-15 source package. There was some
minor twe
6 matches
Mail list logo
