On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:21:14PM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Saunders wrote:
> On 9/26/06, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >It's a non-issue.
>
> I agree. However much you might wish it, list policy is not determined
> by plebiscite.
Hi Andrew:
Thanks for your comments.
It should be,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:35:27AM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Saunders wrote:
> On 9/24/06, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Why don't such things ever get submitted for a vote, to see exactly
> >where the membership stands on this ?
>
> I would guess that the vast majority of those who
On Monday, September 25, 2006 8:08 PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> IIRC, the Debian lists are powered by mailman. Have they just
> disabled this functionality, or is it a technical/political issue?
If they use Mailman, there is a feature to allow users to determine
whether they r
On 9/24/06, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why don't such things ever get submitted for a vote, to see exactly
where the membership stands on this ?
I would guess that the vast majority of those who post without being
subscribed don't follow the list except to monitor follow-ups to their
o
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:53:21PM -0500 or thereabouts, Seth Goodman wrote:
> I think the following would make Debian lists better for everyone:
>
> 1) allow users to subscribe for posting only,
>
> 2) require users to subscribe before posting and
>
> 3) allow users to
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:53:21PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
>
> I think the following would make Debian lists better for everyone:
>
> 1) allow users to subscribe for posting only,
>
IIRC, the Debian lists are powered by mailman. Have they just disabled
this functional
ndrei pointed in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg01837.html that for an
occasional poster to a high volume list, it is a burden to require them
to receive all list traffic. It's not a problem when the list allows
subscribing for posting only (i.e. majordomo 'nomail', Mailm
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 09:34 -0400, Stephen wrote:
> One can endlessly debate the issue, but at the end of the day, if the
> majority wish this to be implemented, then it should be done. The views of a
> few, should never outweigh those of the majority, and it doesn't in the
> slightest prevent pe
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 01:22:30PM -0500 or thereabouts, Seth Goodman wrote:
> You are right in saying there is no apparent way to subscribe without
> getting all the list traffic. Without this feature, it is impractical
> to require that posters first confirm their email address.
Why ? I don't
On Friday, September 22, 2006 12:15 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150
> > > mails/day just for a simple answer.
On 9/22/06, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> > It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150 mails/day
> > just for a simple answer.
>
> There's no reason you h
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> > It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150 mails/day
> > just for a simple answer.
>
> There's no reason you have to receive list traffic. You can already do
> thi
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:38 PM -0500, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> It's not nice to require *everybody* to receive 100-150 mails/day
> just for a simple answer.
There's no reason you have to receive list traffic. You can already do
this if you subscribe via email. There is no reason the web
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:44 PM -0500, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think that closing mailing lists is the right way to fight
> against spam.
>
> The question is whether requirin
On Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:44 PM -0500, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> I don't think that closing mailing lists is the right way to fight
against spam.
The question is whether requiring a user to answer one confirmation
message before posting is any real burden. You have to send
t; > without needing to do that step. I don't buy the argument that it's too
> > much of a hurdle to expect a newbie to debian to subscribe --
> > Subscribing to e-mail lists is done pretty much everywhere, so it's an
> > expected task, by pretty much anyone usi
urdle to expect a newbie to debian to subscribe --
> Subscribing to e-mail lists is done pretty much everywhere, so it's an
> expected task, by pretty much anyone using them.
I have already seen spammer subscribed to the mailing list just to push the
spam into it. We may expect more, as
Kevin Buhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The final alternative is to employ ugly per-MUA hacks, like the
> "use_from" Mutt option that Andrew mentioned.
Whoops... It looks like Andrew's descriptions were a little mixed up.
According to the Mutt manual, it isn't "use_from" that does this, it's
"
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> When I send from thunderbird from any machine, it works as it is
> connecting directly to santiago. If I use mutt on santiago, it works
> fine there as well since it is running an instance of Postfix which can
> be reached from the public intern
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:06:04PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> what does your "From" header look like? Is it supposed to show a
> return address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would assume not, that it
> should show a return address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The point is, are
> you setting your Fro
antiago (smarthost) -> Internet
>
> Now, miami runs postfix, but it is not accessible from the outside.
> Now, when I am using mutt on miami, sending a message to the Sourceforge
> mailing lists generates a reply like this to santiago (which acts as the
> smarthost) since the Re
om the outside.
Now, when I am using mutt on miami, sending a message to the Sourceforge
mailing lists generates a reply like this to santiago (which acts as the
smarthost) since the Return-Path is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aug 7 20:28:50 santiago postfix/smtp[11711]: 778272403E:
to=,
relay=extern
. Currently I am not having any
problems with d-u. But I am having problems with other mailing lists like vim
where I had to approve the new "from addresses" manually. More details at
http://forums.bluebottle.com/index.php?showtopic=221
But this inconvenience is minor compared to going t
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:40:12PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> But not everyone has the resources to run a dedicated mail server and
> maintain
> it. Many people use webmail such as gmail, yahoo, hotmail etc., What about
> them? They should suffer by exposing their email address to the p
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:39:47 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> Different mail to news gateways. The gmane.* heirarchy is generally
>>> the best mail to news gateways.
>
> T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> 2nd to that.
>
> Sorry, what do you mean with `2nd to that'? (My
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> In my experience, it is possible to read and send messages to debian lists
> in at least three ways: e.g., the present one:
> via `debian-user' mailing list; through `linux.debian.user' newsgroup;
> through `gmane.linux.debian.user' newsgrou
On Sun, 21 May 2006 10:11:28 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 21 May 2006 09:18, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>> Now, I realised that `gmane.linux.debian.user' preserves the message's
>> original headers, whereas `linux.debian.user' changes the Message ID
>> into a different value.
>
> Differen
On Sunday 21 May 2006 09:18, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Now, I realised that `gmane.linux.debian.user' preserves the message's
> original headers, whereas `linux.debian.user' changes the Message ID
> into a different value.
Different mail to news gateways. The gmane.* heirarchy is generally the bes
Hi, all.
In my experience, it is possible to read and send messages to debian lists
in at least three ways: e.g., the present one:
via `debian-user' mailing list; through `linux.debian.user' newsgroup;
through `gmane.linux.debian.user' newsgroup.
Now, I realised that `gmane.li
> I'm pretty sure you can post via news, at least on gmane.org, and am
> testing it with this very message.
>
> --
> Christopher Nelson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
> Thanks,
> I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
> Here is a smaller sig... sorry... I didn't mean to annoy anyone...
> Most sincerely,
>
> "For GOD so LOVED the world that he gave his only begotten son, that
> whosoever should believe in him should not perish but have everlasting li
3:16 GOD's Holy BIBLE
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Sackville-West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 4:32 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: View Debian mailing lists in a news reader
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Da
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
> Thanks,
> I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
> lists.debian.org or linux.debian.user...
> I'll keep trying...
If you're doing gmane.org, it's gmane.linux.debian.user
Once you attempt your first p
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:34:33PM +0200, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >with all due respect, you must not send such lengthy signatures in
> >your emails to this list.
>
> Andrew, you should also quote and trim properly when replying to list
> email ;)
point well take
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
with all due respect, you must not send such lengthy signatures in
your emails to this list.
Andrew, you should also quote and trim properly when replying to list
email ;)
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam & anti-virus
Consultant
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:20:08PM -0500, Daniel L. McGrew wrote:
> Thanks,
> I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
> lists.debian.org or linux.debian.user...
> I'll keep trying...
> Most sincerely,
with all due respect, you m
Thanks,
I appreciate the help, but that didn't work... it's not
lists.debian.org or linux.debian.user...
I'll keep trying...
Most sincerely,
Love is very patient and kind, never jealous or envious, never boastful or
proud, never haughty or
Hi all
My actual problem is to forward the messages that appear in news groups
http://groups.google.com/group/cornell.marketplace/
http://groups.google.com/group/ithaca.marketplace/
http://groups.google.com/group/ithaca.general/
etc., to a mailing list http://groups.google.com/group/cornell-baz
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
[...]
generated garbage addresses. I recall seeing quite sophisticated
implementations of this, in which an "invisible" (for normal users) link
on a webpage leads email harvesting robots into a maze of dynamically
generated bogus pages full of t
ress as the
> forged sender, my email address will end up on public display on one
> more web page, your "Poison The Well" project page. This in turn
I should say here that, as my personal philosophy on spam goes,
"munging", or otherwise hiding your email address, is essen
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
s. keeling wrote:
[...]
Consider joining my (ad hoc) "Poison The Well" project:
http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html
Maybe I misunderstand what you are doing, but aren't you increasing the
spam load for people whose real email addres
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:51:20PM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Thirdly, it also hides the email addresses from which I receive the
> email. I always have to click on "More options" to see brief headers.
> For some reason I like to see the email addresses (brief headers) from
> which I re
Hi,
> On forums.debian.net, people should be redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> when they don't get an answer there, because debian-user has more
> 'powerusers' than forums.debian.net. The audiences of both support
> resources are reasonably separate, because people tend to either swear
> by forums
Incoming from Kelly Clowers:
> [?]:
> > 3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
>
> Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's interface?
Based on your reply, it apparently encourages one to lose attributions.
--
Any technology distinguis
Incoming from kamaraju kusumanchi:
> Kelly Clowers wrote:
> >
> >>3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
> >
> >Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's
> >interface?
> >For me, gmail is the best interface I have found for reading d-u.
>
On 3/18/06, kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Q: what's wrong with Gmail?]
> For starters, it encourages the use of top posting by placing the cursor
> at the begining of the message instead of placing the cursor at the end
> of the message - like thunderbird does. Ideally they can gi
Incoming from Willie Wonka:
>
Please trim extraneous text next time.
> subscribing to it, thinking it was necessary to join/post on this list
> (linux.debian.user)
>
> This is the list -->> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<--
They are the gatekeepers of the Usenet _newsgroups_ linux.debian.*
(and perhaps o
Incoming from Håkon Alstadheim:
> s. keeling wrote:
> >Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
> >>s. keeling wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Consider joining my (ad hoc) "Poison The Well" project:
> >>>
> >>>http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html
> >>
> >>sender address by the spammers? How do you make sure not to i
net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for
example.
> > [...]
> > This could be a real problem in the long run if the procedure is
> > adopted by many. For example, a user searching the archives in
> > forums.debian.net might not find the answer even though
Kelly Clowers wrote:
3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
high volume mailing list such as d-u, pop the emails into your favorite
client such as thunderbird
Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's interface?
For me, gmail is th
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
s. keeling wrote:
Consider joining my (ad hoc) "Poison The Well" project:
http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html
Maybe I misunderstand what you are doing, but aren't you increasing the
spam load for people whose real email a
> 3) But since gmail's conversation view is not very convenient to read a
> high volume mailing list such as d-u, pop the emails into your favorite
> client such as thunderbird
Just out of curiosity, what do you find inconvenient about gmail's interface?
For me, gmail is the best interface I have
Incoming from Florian Kulzer:
> s. keeling wrote:
> >Incoming from Hex Star:
> >
> >>[snip]
> >>contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other
> >>lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like
>
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Hex Star:
[snip]
contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other
lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like
user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully displayed in its
original f
y email address gets harvested by even more spam bots...and btw, how could people not like gmails conversation model? :P I love it, especially for mailing lists because it makes following the postings really easy, just click the first post in the mailing list "thread" in the gmail webmail i
Incoming from Hex Star:
> [snip]
> contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other
> lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like
> user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully displayed in its
> original form
Hex Star wrote:
Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made
publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated
like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive
to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc)
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:13:44AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that
> users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
> forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user fo
all
> > > I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to> > > feel that> > > users are getting confused between multiple forms of support> > > available -
> > > forums.debian.net <http://forums.debian.net> and other mailing&
/17/06, *kamaraju kusumanchi* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all
> > > I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to
> > > feel that
> > > users are getting c
IL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:>> Hi all> I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to> feel that> users are getting confused between multiple forms of support> available -
> forums.debian.net <http://forums.debian.net> and other m
sts I made> > publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated
> > like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive> > to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's> > fully displayed in its original form
Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:40:14 -0800:
> Hex Star wrote:
>
> > Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made
> > publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated
> > like on
Hex Star wrote:
Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made
publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated
like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive
to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc)
ED]>> wrote:
Hi all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to
feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support
available -
forums.debian.net <http://forums.debian.net> and other mailing
lists such as debian-user for exam
Hi, I've noticed that in the archive of this list, the posts I made publicly contain my full email address instead of it being obfuscated like on other lists (e.g. they change email addresses in the archive to something like user[at]domain[dot]com or user domain com, etc) it's fully di
re but I am starting to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.For example, recently a post is made to debian-user
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/03/msg01447.htmland the same
allI might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel thatusers are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
For example, recently a post is made to debian-userhttp://lists.debian.org/de
Hi all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
For example, recently a post is made to debian-user
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:12:29 +0530
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to subscribe to debian-* mailing lists with mail
> delivery turned off?
No, but you can post if you're not subscribed.
HTH,
Jacob
-BE
Hi,
Is there a way to subscribe to debian-* mailing lists with mail
delivery turned off?
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention"
"Stealing logics from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is
researchut"
i certainly hope so
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, 17 January 2006 at 15:22:25 -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:46:48PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[...]
> >
> > I'm not too big a fan of too many surveys... but that's my personal
> > opinion.
> >
> > Johannes
> >
>
> Actually, prior to OP message showi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:46:48PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> >SkSowe wrote:
> >
> >>Dear participant,
> >>
> >>We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing
> >>lists (Kde, Mentor
Title: E-mail message content
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing lists (Kde, Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these lists during the
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
SkSowe wrote:
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing
lists (Kde, Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives
http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these
lists
SkSowe wrote:
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing lists (Kde,
Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these lists
during the period January 2001
Title: E-mail message content
Dear participant,
We have completed a study which utilized data from 3 Debian mailing lists (Kde, Mentors, Users) located at Debian list archives http://lists.debian.org/.
Our data extraction and analysis shows that you participated in these lists during the
> Mitch Wiedemann wanted us to know:
>On the topic mentioned above, I find HTML e-mail useful sometimes, but I
>wouldn't send it to an e-mail list unless it was a generally accepted
>practice on the specific list.
Some people use text based MUAs that do not support html. Thus I think
we should be
Jon Dowland wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:29:23PM +0100, privacy.at Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>
>
>>And it has no place on this (or any other) mailing list.
>>E-mail should be sent in plain text only.
>>
>>
>
>I don't agree, entirely. Email is a convenient transport mechanism for
>many
ation, which is what I always prefer for high
volume lists anyway, since I prefer to Google Group such lists. I had a
quick try to find out how to do it in a Smartlist before vacation, but
my only results were: Smartlist uses X-Commands (simple additions to the
mail headers I supose) to interact
2005/9/18, linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
> i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
> responses to other questions that i don't understand
> are mailing lists meant to work like this? how do i get
Mailing lists are an inefficient way to get an answer to a single question
because you will get loads (I'm on 1,000 since I signed on here) of responses
to things that don't even remotely relate to your question. However, it is
also a GREAT way to really get into a subject. And, to
On Sunday 18 September 2005 09:21 pm, linux wrote:
> is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
It's you.
> i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
> responses to other questions that i don't understand are mailing lists meant
> to work l
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:21:16PM +1000, linux wrote:
> is it just me or is this mailing list useless? i posted my question
> ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of responses to other
> questions that i don't understand are mailing lists meant to work like
> this? ho
linux:
>
> is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
It's probably not just you, but for the majority of subscribers it is
not useless. :)
> i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
> responses to other questions that i don't understand
>
--- linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
> i posted my question ages ago and have recieved
> nothing but heaps of
> responses to other questions that i don't understand
> are mailing lists meant to work like this? how
is it just me or is this mailing list useless?
i posted my question ages ago and have recieved nothing but heaps of
responses to other questions that i don't understand
are mailing lists meant to work like this? how do i get better results
out of this mailing list?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 13:03 +, J.A. de Vries wrote:
> On 2005-07-22 @ 00:13:38 (week 29) michael wrote:
>
> > I think it's a question of interpretation of the man pages. To me it
> > seems that '-x' *also* gives the runlevel info; and that '-t' gives all
> > entries *up to* a date (as opposed
On 2005-07-22 @ 00:13:38 (week 29) michael wrote:
> I think it's a question of interpretation of the man pages. To me it
> seems that '-x' *also* gives the runlevel info; and that '-t' gives all
> entries *up to* a date (as opposed to since or on that date)
Here's the two relevant excerpts fr
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 23:03 +, J.A. de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For a monitor script I thought I'd use the -t switch of the last command
> hoping to get only the latest entries from wtmp. Seems there's something
> wrong there, since it will return all entries in wtmp regardless. Before
> I submi
Strake:
>
> Thx, it worked. I think I'll go download sarge now :D
You don't need to download an installation CD and reinstall from
scratch. Just edit your /etc/apt/sources.list and change entries with
'woody' to 'sarge'. Then run 'aptitude update && aptitude dist-upgrade'.
You might want to read
,
and it gave me this error:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occurred while processing pkcipe (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_stable_main_binary-1386_Packages
E: The package lists or status file could not
Thx, it worked. I think I'll go download sarge now :D
On 6/11/05, Maurits van Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 09:52:28AM -0400, Strake wrote:
> > E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
>
> That should be solved by specifying the 'Cache-Limit' for
> apt in /etc/apt/apt.conf, e.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 09:52:28AM -0400, Strake wrote:
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
That should be solved by specifying the 'Cache-Limit' for
apt in /etc/apt/apt.conf, e.g. like this:
echo 'APT::Cache-Limit "2000";' >> /etc/apt/apt.conf
(Or edit that file manually.)
> I'm running 3.0
this error:
Reading Package Lists... Error!
E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
E: Error occurred while processing pkcipe (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_stable_main_binary-1386_Packages
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or
ad was about the reject messages I didn't get. If the
> > Peoria Inter-Denominational College of Neo-Tibetan Goldfish Juggling
> > received thirty of my dollops of spam, who else was getting them and
> > was I being put on blacklists by, well, "clueless mail
d bandwidth.
> The worry I had was about the reject messages I didn't get. If the
> Peoria Inter-Denominational College of Neo-Tibetan Goldfish Juggling
> received thirty of my dollops of spam, who else was getting them and
> was I being put on blacklists by, well, "clueles
Incoming from Larry Felton Johnson:
> keep the folks in my work group
> amused with a "Spam of the Week" posting, often involving the stream
I recently stumbled across a thread on my local user group list where
victims were holding "dick wars" over the highest SA scores they've
seen ("mine's bigg
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 04:43:43PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from David Jardine:
> >
> > What worries me is the spam that is sent out under my name. Just
>
> I get bounces from clueless mail admins all the time. If they'd spend
> two seconds scanning the original's Received: headers,
601 - 700 of 1296 matches
Mail list logo
