Hi,
I am trying to setup lm_sensors for an older Zotac IONITX-U-E mainboard.
The values I get from the w83667hg-isa-0a10 are all looking good and are in
line with what I see in the BIOS. But the values I get from
coretemp-isa- are way off. They are around +9/+10°C for both cores
while
Bonjour,
After the last upgrade of my debien sid, lm_sensors reports in logwatch
(first time I see that! I didn't change anything in my config). Here is
the last report:
- lm_sensors output Begin
acpitz-virtual-0
Adapter: Virtual device
temp1
Patrick Zaloum wrote:
Final Thought - Addendum to step 6... DO remove lm-sensors package, or
change the Makefile to install to /usr. It will otherwise install to
/usr/local and you will have duplicates.
On Feb 12, 2008 11:26 PM, Patrick Zaloum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a modern motherboard (Asus p5kc) running Etch-r2. I know it has the
devices necessary to provide sensor data but the kernel version that etch is
built on (2.6.18) is not recent enough for the required module (w83627ehf)
to support it:
# modprobe w83627ehf
FATAL: Error inserting w83627ehf
Problem SOLVED!
So for anyone using a new motherboard with Etch facing the same error many
people were:
FATAL: Error inserting w83627ehf
(/lib/modules/2.6.18-6-686/kernel/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.ko): No such
device
The steps i took to successfully get it to work:
1. Upgrade to kernel 2.6.22
Actually that's precicely what I just did, i'm running 2.6.22-3 from
backports now, but so far i'm not any better for trying. Now when i run
sensors i get the following error:
w83627dhg-i2c-9191-290
ERROR: Can't get adapter or algorithm?!?
So new question: What do i do now? :/
On Feb 12,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:21:26PM -0500, Patrick Zaloum wrote:
I have a modern motherboard (Asus p5kc) running Etch-r2. I know it has the
devices necessary to provide sensor data but the kernel version that etch is
built on (2.6.18) is not recent enough for the required module (w83627ehf)
to
Final Thought - Addendum to step 6... DO remove lm-sensors package, or
change the Makefile to install to /usr. It will otherwise install to
/usr/local and you will have duplicates.
On Feb 12, 2008 11:26 PM, Patrick Zaloum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem SOLVED!
So for anyone using a new
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:00:24 -0500
Patrick Zaloum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually that's precicely what I just did, i'm running 2.6.22-3 from
backports now, but so far i'm not any better for trying. Now when i run
sensors i get the following error:
w83627dhg-i2c-9191-290
ERROR: Can't
I am having the same problem that you have/had. I have 127C for all of
my temp values and can't find the error. By any chance have you figured
anything out?
Thanks,
Shawn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you need to
load to use lm_sensors most effectively. You need to have i2c and
lm_sensors installed before running this program.
Also, you need to be `root', or at least have access to the /dev/i2c-*
files, for most things.
If you have patched your kernel and have some drivers built in, you can
Lubos Vrbka wrote:
#cut here
# I2C adapter drivers
i2c-i801
# I2C chip drivers
# no driver for Smart Battery Charger yet
#cut here
It seems your card is not supported by lm-sensors. Check
http://www.lm-sensors.nu, specifically the supported devices section to
Lubos Vrbka wrote:
$ sensors
Can't access procfs/sysfs file
Unable to find i2c bus information;
For 2.6 kernels, make sure you have mounted sysfs and libsensors
was compiled with sysfs support!
For older kernels, make sure you have done 'modprobe i2c-proc'!
This happens on my system when I
Felipe Sateler wrote:
This happens on my system when I unload w83627hf (which is the module I need
for my chipset). Have you loaded the modules sensors-detect said you should
load? Adding the lines in /etc/modules doesn't automatically load them
(actually, yes, they are loaded automatically, but
Lubos Vrbka wrote:
Felipe Sateler wrote:
This happens on my system when I unload w83627hf (which is the module I
need for my chipset). Have you loaded the modules sensors-detect said you
should load? Adding the lines in /etc/modules doesn't automatically load
them (actually, yes, they are
hi guys,
there has recently been a discussion on amd64 list about the lm_sensors.
when trying it on my i386 box i seem to have the same problem, however
solution was not given on amd64. maybe someone can provide me with some
hints?
$ sensors
Can't access procfs/sysfs file
Unable to find i2c
phyrster on 31/07/05 11:45, wrote:
On 19:38 Sat 30 Jul 2005, Adam Hardy wrote:
When I installed the new kernel with the debian package, I configured it
with make xconfig, but I didn't see any choices for i2c_i801 in the i2c
section. Now I see it, but it is greyed out and I cannot select it.
On 19:38 Sat 30 Jul 2005, Adam Hardy wrote:
When I installed the new kernel with the debian package, I configured it
with make xconfig, but I didn't see any choices for i2c_i801 in the i2c
section. Now I see it, but it is greyed out and I cannot select it.
Not sure what's wrong. try 'make
I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.12 last week and during rebooting, I saw an
error saying:
lm_sensors Module i2c_i801 not found
or something similar - I cannot find any boot log now.
So my gKrellM monitor can't show any CPU temperature.
When I installed the new kernel with the debian package, I
Hi,
Has anybody had any experiences programming the lm_sensors daemon? It
allows you to read the disk temps via a port.
They have an example of it in their contrib section crash.c. That
works OK but after a while connect complains that the filedescriptor is bad.
Leaves me at a loss, sort
lm_sensors y i2c, ambos se pueden encontrar en
http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/download.html
Para poder ejecutar la configuración por medio de LM_SENSORS se necesita
tener activo o habilitar en el kernel para manejar i2c, y es exactamente lo
que no sé hacer, cómo instalarlo o cómo
Instalé Debian Sarge en mi computadora Sony de escritorio, en el caso de mi
computadora se necesita hacer una configuración para controlar la velocidad de
los ventiladores, esta configuración se hace mediante los programas lm_sensors
y i2c, ambos se pueden encontrar en
http
lm_sensors har börjar strula av nån anledning och fått burken att pipa och
jag lyckas inte få stopp på ljudet... :-(
Har satt ignore på allt i /etc/sensors.conf som gör att alarmet går på men
ljudet slutar inte låta Hjälper inte ens med /etc/init.d/lm_sensors
stop eller nått !!
Nån som
timebandit:
lm_sensors har börjar strula av nån anledning och fått burken att pipa
och jag lyckas inte få stopp på ljudet... :-(
Har satt ignore på allt i /etc/sensors.conf som gör att alarmet går på
men ljudet slutar inte låta Hjälper inte ens med
/etc/init.d/lm_sensors stop eller
Hej, jag vet inte vad lm_sensors är..
Tipset om aumix du fick kanske hjälper..
Sedan har jag inte testat det.. men i katalogen /etc/default finns en
massa filer, i /etc/default/aumix kanske man kan göra så att dess
värden sparas mellan omstarterna av datorn. Men kanske ska man inte röra
denna
Per Blomqvist:
Sedan har jag inte testat det.. men i katalogen /etc/default finns en
massa filer, i /etc/default/aumix kanske man kan göra så att dess
värden sparas mellan omstarterna av datorn. Men kanske ska man inte röra
denna katalogen, någon som stött på den?
Skriptet
Chris,
I didn't include any more information as I was not expecting any more help
at that time. But thanks anyway.
I have followed the links you gave me and I think I understand how it all
fits together now , and I of course found the it87.c source file too.
At the moment I have an unresolved
looking for.
Cheers Brian
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2004 21:41:32 +0200
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to get lm_sensors installed. Sensors-detect seemed
to go OK. In fact all seems to be going OK until the IT87 modules should
be loaded. There I get module not found
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 11:50:21 +0200
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
thanks for your answer, I spent most of yesterday googling and looking
at the lm-sensors website. I found various module packages, but never
did actually find one for my Kernel, but I also never ever found
anything that
Hi,
I am currently trying to get lm_sensors installed. Sensors-detect seemed to
go OK. In fact all seems to be going OK until the IT87 modules should be
loaded. There I get module not found. And sure enough the module is not there.
Reading much of the lm_sensors stuff did not tell me where
On Mon, 31 May 2004 21:41:32 +0200
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to get lm_sensors installed. Sensors-detect seemed
to go OK. In fact all seems to be going OK until the IT87 modules should
be loaded. There I get module not found. And sure enough the module
Moin!
Am Samstag, 17. April 2004 17:40 schrieb Frank Schiebel:
Schau mal da: http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/kernel26.html
Das Problem: Es sind noch nicht alle sensors Module in den neuen Kernel
gewandert, da hilft wohl vor allem Geduld.
Das Leben kann so einfach sein :-). Vielleicht sollte
Moin!
Ich versuche seit einiger Zeit, lm_sensors zum laufen zu bekommen:
Schau mal da: http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/kernel26.html
Das Problem: Es sind noch nicht alle sensors Module in den neuen Kernel gewandert, da
hilft wohl vor allem Geduld.
Mit checkinstall kann man sich auch
Moin!
Ich versuche seit einiger Zeit, lm_sensors zum laufen zu bekommen:
- installieren der Pakete lm-sensors-source und i2c-source
- entpacken in /usr/src/modules/lm-senors bzw. i2c
- Aufruf in /usr/src/linux: make-kpkg --revision=irgendwas modules_image.
Da kommt dann das:
for module in /usr
, lm_sensors zum laufen zu bekommen:
- installieren der Pakete lm-sensors-source und i2c-source
- entpacken in /usr/src/modules/lm-senors bzw. i2c
- Aufruf in /usr/src/linux: make-kpkg --revision=irgendwas modules_image.
Da kommt dann das:
for module in /usr/src/modules/lm-sensors /usr/src/modules/i2c ; do
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:25:20PM +0100, Lionel Draghi wrote:
Salut,
Est-ce le passage au 2.6 implique pour l'instant le renoncement à
lm_sensors?
Il semble que beaucoup de choses aient étés intégrées dans le kernel,
mais ce qui ne l'est pas doit être en 2.8.2 (?) mini.
Hors je ne voit
Philippe Marzouk a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:25:20PM +0100, Lionel Draghi wrote:
Salut,
Est-ce le passage au 2.6 implique pour l'instant le renoncement à
lm_sensors?
Il semble que beaucoup de choses aient étés intégrées dans le kernel,
mais ce qui ne l'est pas doit être en 2.8.2
Salut,
Est-ce le passage au 2.6 implique pour l'instant le renoncement à
lm_sensors?
Il semble que beaucoup de choses aient étés intégrées dans le kernel,
mais ce qui ne l'est pas doit être en 2.8.2 (?) mini.
Hors je ne voit pas de paquet supérieur à 2.6.5 (sensord, lm_sensors,
libsensors
Salut à tous,
Je recherche une personne utilisant une carte mère ASUS P4PE avec
chipset i845, afin de connaitre la valeur que renvoie la commande :
setpci -d 8086:24c0 f2.w
et :
setpci -d 8086:24c3 f2.w
merci d'avance,
et excusez moi pour ce message par forcément en rapport direct à debian.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 05:05:27AM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
where there isn't a convenient command like
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg.
My particular case is X 4.2.0, which I
...snip...
Thanks to all and George,David,Jsen and Hugo
Let me explain somewhat better what's my pb:
My MB is a ASUS P4T533-R with an ASB100 - Bach chip ( w83781d ??)
And have kernels 2.4.20-bf24, 2.4.18-bf24, 2.4.686 and my own
2.4.20 installed. Yes by old-way I mean bzImage, etc... ( all
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:52:18PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
3) get the woody backport of X4.2 from
http://people.debian.org/~blade/woody/ :)
Nah, just looked there. His is the testing version (4.2.1), I have
4.2.0. But thanks anyway.
Pigeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg.
My particular case is X 4.2.0, which I downloaded the source of and
compiled for slink, then for woody when I
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:09:04AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:57PM +, Pigeon wrote:
It would be useful to know how to do this in the more general case,
where there isn't a convenient command like make-kpkg.
My particular case is X 4.2.0, which I
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:42:38AM +0800, Jsen wrote:
* Hugo Graumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sorry, this error messages appaers on the install of this i2c package :
dpkg: dependency problems prevent
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:01:25PM -0700, Hugo Graumann wrote:
* On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:00:17AM +0100, mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sorry, this error messages appaers on the install of this i2c package :
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of i2c-2.4.20:
i2c-2.4.20
here is my
| intended post now...
|
|
| I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under
| debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting this
| started but none the less, if someone could give me a bit of a
| walk-through to getting things running
aware I sent it as a reply to
| another post. Sorry about that, so without further adue here is my
| intended post now...
|
|
| I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under
| debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting this
| started
:
|
| I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to
| another post. Sorry about that, so without further adue here is my
| intended post now...
|
|
| I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under
| debian. I am pretty sure
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:42:11AM -0700, Hugo Graumann wrote:
Got hardware sensors working on a few motherboards here and even
took notes on how it was done. Perhaps these notes might be useful to you.
Thanks Hugo!
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
lm_sensors to work under
debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting this
started but none the less, if someone could give me a bit of a
walk-through to getting things running I would appreciate it. My
intention is mostly to monitor my hardware temp's etc, being that I am
adue here is my
intended post now...
I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under
debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting this
started but none the less, if someone could give me a bit of a
walk-through to getting things running I
karrottop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Although I am sure I have about 75% of what I need to do complete, could
somebody give me a walkthrough of getting lm-sensors up and running on
debian? The goal being getting some sort of information with the
command sensors or with gkrellm's sensor plugin,
I am re-posting this because I was made aware I sent it as a reply to
another post. Sorry about that, so without further adue here is my
intended post now...
I am having a great deal of trouble getting lm_sensors to work under
debian. I am pretty sure that I am about 75% on the way to getting
Although I am sure I have about 75% of what I need to do complete, could
somebody give me a walkthrough of getting lm-sensors up and running on
debian? The goal being getting some sort of information with the
command sensors or with gkrellm's sensor plugin, thanksif it matters
I am using
karrottop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to get im_sensors running on my debian box, but I am getting
some opposition. First of all, I do have my kernel source, and it is
symlinked to /usr/src/linux. but for some reason when I go to where i2c
installed from apt get
I am trying to get im_sensors running on my debian box, but I am getting
some opposition. First of all, I do have my kernel source, and it is
symlinked to /usr/src/linux. but for some reason when I go to where i2c
installed from apt get /usr/src/modules/i2c (or something to that
effect) and then
hi ya
usually... ( at least for me ) its easiest to d/l the
latest/greatest lmsensors package and build it separate
from the kernel
http://www.Linux-1U.net/LCD/lm_sensors.Txt/i2c.uHowTo.txt
c ya
alvin
On 1 Feb 2003, karrottop wrote:
I am trying to get im_sensors running on my debian box,
Hallo Liste,
ich weiß das ich hier nicht ganz richtig bin, habe jedoch die Hoffnung das mir
hier jemand weiterhelfen kann.
Hat jemand hier ein Dual Athlon System mit einem Tyan Board ( S2640 ) und
LM_sensors (2.6.2 - 2.7 geht nicht) am Start?
Wenn ja, sind die angezeigten Temperaturen
Salut,
C'est exactement ça. Tu as parfaitement raison.
Il faut que les sources du package i2c-source soient présents pendant la
compilation.
Merci pour l'info
A+
Le sam 23/11/2002 à 02:06, Sébastien Person a écrit :
as tu utilisé le package i2c-source ?
dans mon cas je l'avais decompresse
Bonsoir,
J'essaye d'appliquer la méthode mais voilà ce que j'obtiens lors d'un
make-kpkg --revision custom.1.0 modules_image :
gcc -I. -Ikernel/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/src/linux/include
-O2 -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -fomit-frame-pointer -DEXPORT_SYMTAB
-DMODVERSIONS -include
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bonsoir,
Bonsoir,
[...]
kernel/busses/i2c-ali1535.c:183: `I2C_HW_SMBUS_ALI1535' undeclared here
(not in a function)
kernel/busses/i2c-ali1535.c:183: initializer element is not constant
kernel/busses/i2c-ali1535.c:183: (near initialization for
voilà ce que j'ai :
#
# I2C support
#
CONFIG_I2C=m
CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT=m
# CONFIG_I2C_PHILIPSPAR is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ELV is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_VELLEMAN is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALGOPCF is not set
CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=m
CONFIG_I2C_PROC=m
et un lsmod donne entre autres choses :
em8300
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Merci de ne pas envoyer une copie en privé]
voilà ce que j'ai :
#
# I2C support
#
CONFIG_I2C=m
Il me semble que celui-ci doit être obligatoirement à y
Christian
Le ven 22/11/2002 à 21:52, Christian Marillat a écrit :
#
# I2C support
#
CONFIG_I2C=m
Il me semble que celui-ci doit être obligatoirement à y
J'ai essayé, j'ai le même résultat.
Je ne sais plus quoi faire.
--
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as tu utilisé le package i2c-source ?
dans mon cas je l'avais decompresse mais pas compile, mais peut est
qu'il est utile lors de la génération des modules ?
[snip]
Le 22 Nov 2002 21:03:19 +0100
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED] à écrit:
Bonsoir,
J'essaye d'appliquer la méthode mais voilà ce que
Je vous remercie tous de l'aide apportée. Je vais essayer de résumer
comment j'ai procéder pour laisser une trâce sur la liste.
-
L'installation que je d'écris a été effectué sur un noyau 2.4.19 sous
sarge.
Je pense que cela devrait marcher pour tous les noyaux = 2.4.13.
Il faut activer
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:03:04 +
Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Je vous remercie tous de l'aide apportée. Je vais essayer de résumer
comment j'ai procéder pour laisser une trâce sur la liste.
Une intention si coopérative ne pouvait restée trop longtemps sans
punition ... Voici une
Désolé pour la déception, mais il va falloir gommer les erreurs.
Ci joint le diff de la page html
A+
jo
(See attached file: diff.materiel-peripheriques)
diff.materiel-peripheriques
Description: Binary data
On 2002.11.18 13:58 Georges Mariano wrote:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/debfr-faq/html/debfr-matos.html#toc61
Une petite correction:
9.2.1 Flash Drive
../..
(NB : Il faut absolument avoir un noyau 2.4.x.)
L'USB a été 'backporté' sur les derniers noyaux 2.2
* Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 17:57] :
ARTUS Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
le Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:55:21PM +0100, Christian Marillat a ecrit:
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 15:07] :
Non, nous
* Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 13:39] :
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Sinon, tu auras probablement besoin des paquets lm-sensors et sensord
(pour afficher les infos) et tu peux aller voir sur
Il y a des paquets beaucoup plus sympa genre cricket
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 13:39] :
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Il y a des paquets beaucoup plus sympa genre cricket ou mrtg pour faire
ça.
Ça dépend de l'utilisation que l'on en a : chez moi, c'est
Bonjour,
je voudrais savoir quelle est la meilleur facon d'installer lm_sensors
sous sarge ?
module ? patch du kernel ?
Il faut aussi recompiler i2c ?
Merci
--
___ __
( O O ) ( ) | ) \_/..
--oOOo--( )--oOOo/V\---
Sebastien Person
Le Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:13:54 +, Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
Bonjour,
je voudrais savoir quelle est la meilleur facon d'installer lm_sensors
sous sarge ?
module ? patch du kernel ?
lm_sensors n'est pas un patch mais un lot de modules non-officiels,
c'est-à-dire
Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
je voudrais savoir quelle est la meilleur facon d'installer lm_sensors
sous sarge ?
module ? patch du kernel ?
Il n'y a pas de meilleure façon, cela dépends de tes gouts.
Pas besoin de patcher le noyau. Déjà ce n'est pas propre
* Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 09:13] :
Bonjour,
je voudrais savoir quelle est la meilleur facon d'installer lm_sensors
sous sarge ?
module ? patch du kernel ?
En module, en utilisant, par exemple, un make-kpkg modules_image
après avoir installé le paquet lm-sensors
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Sinon, tu auras probablement besoin des paquets lm-sensors et sensord
(pour afficher les infos) et tu peux aller voir sur
Il y a des paquets beaucoup plus sympa genre cricket ou mrtg pour faire
ça.
Christian
Le Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:23:18 +0100
Frédéric BOITEUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] à écrit:
Le Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:13:54 +, Sébastien Person
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Bonjour,
je voudrais savoir quelle est la meilleur facon d'installer
lm_sensors sous sarge ?
module ? patch du kernel
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:07:23PM +, Sébastien Person wrote:
lm_sensors n'est pas un patch mais un lot de modules non-officiels,
c'est-à-dire non livrés dans le paquet standard du source linux.
Soit tu as un noyau officiel debian, et il suffit d'installer le
paquet lm-sensors-modules
* Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 15:07] :
Le Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:23:18 +0100
Frédéric BOITEUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] à écrit:
[...]
une fois que j'ai récupéré les sources lm-sensors-source je trouve un
fichier du meme nom dans /usr/src. Tu me dis ensuite de faire make-kpkg
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 15:07] :
[...]
Le truc que je comprends pas bien mais qui doit être évident, c'est ou
dois je décompresser les soources de lm-sensors ? Par ce que pour moi le
make-kpkg se fait dans les sources du
le Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:55:21PM +0100, Christian Marillat a ecrit:
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 15:07] :
Non, nous sommes sur une liste Debian pas sur une liste LFS. Il y a un
paquet Debian qui contient les sources et il faut
Le Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:55:21 +0100, Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oui, il faut commencer par décompresser le fichier .tar.gz du
répertoire /usr/src qui va placer de lui-même les fichiers dans
/usr/src/modules.
Non, nous
ARTUS Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
le Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:55:21PM +0100, Christian Marillat a ecrit:
Frédéric Bothamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Sébastien Person [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 15:07] :
Non, nous sommes sur une liste Debian pas sur une liste LFS. Il y a un
paquet
Good evening,
I've just recompiled kernel 2.4.18 a inserted all i2c* as modules.
Then installed lm_sensors deb package.
It wants i2c-viapro (my mother board is MSI Turbo with this chip)
but this module is not in kernel tree. Where can I get it a and
how to compile and install?
I'm running Woody
Mirek Dobsicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just recompiled kernel 2.4.18 a inserted all i2c* as modules.
Then installed lm_sensors deb package.
It wants i2c-viapro (my mother board is MSI Turbo with this chip)
but this module is not in kernel tree. Where can I get it a and
how to compile
Hi all,
I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody.
I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they
say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also
be updated...
So, I've got the i2c package and I'm going to compile
Hi all,
Here it comes my first problem...
I've unpacked a freshly kernel-2.4.9 sources on /usr/src, and copied my old
configuration there (.config). I've run make menuconfig and deselected the
bttv drivers and i2c. (I've reviewed all the configuration and seems ok).
So, I run:
make-kpkg
Julio Merino wrote:
Hi all,
I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody.
I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they
say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also
be updated...
So, I've got the i2c package and I'm
Julio Merino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JM I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody.
JM
JM I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they
JM say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also
JM be updated...
JM
JM So, I've got
kernel modules pretty automatically.
At 09:57 AM 9/12/01 +0200, you wrote:
Hi all,
I want to compile lm_sensors. I'm using kernel 2.4.9 on woody.
I've got my kernel and disable its i2c and bttv support. Why? Oh, they
say that i2c is needed to be updated, and I guess that bttv should also
the kernel. If you use
kernel-package it's all set up to build kernel modules pretty automatically.
With outside the kernel, I mean recompiling all extensions (i.e. i2c and
lm_sensors) as modules, but without patching the kernel.
But is it possible to do all of this in a debian way, so having
.
RB
RB I'm not sure what you mean by the phrase outside the kernel.
RB If you use kernel-package it's all set up to build kernel modules
RB pretty automatically.
JM
JM With outside the kernel, I mean recompiling all extensions (i.e. i2c and
JM lm_sensors) as modules, but without patching
Just installed lm_sensors for via-pro chipset VT82c596 and ran sensors:
max1617-i2c-0-18
Adapter: SMBus vt82c596 adapter at 5000
Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter
temp: +8.0°C (min = +4°C, max = +0°C)
In /proc/sys/dev/sensors/max1617-i2c-0-18 i get:
temp1 0 4 8
temp2 60 8 0
How do
On Thursday 17 May 2001 09:16, mikepolniak wrote:
Just installed lm_sensors for via-pro chipset VT82c596 and ran sensors:
max1617-i2c-0-18
Adapter: SMBus vt82c596 adapter at 5000
Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter
temp: +8.0°C (min = +4°C, max = +0°C)
In /proc/sys/dev/sensors/max1617
Hi folks,
I recently upgraded up system from a K6-2 350, to a K7 900, running on
an ABit KT7A Motherboard. This is all well and good and works fine and
is very stable...
Anyway, I was reading recently about using lm_sensors to display things
like the CPU temperature and stuff. So I decided to go
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Damon Muller wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently upgraded up system from a K6-2 350, to a K7 900, running on
an ABit KT7A Motherboard. This is all well and good and works fine and
is very stable...
Anyway, I was reading recently about using lm_sensors to display things
like
Hi,
I want to compile in lm_sensors for Gkrellm but can(t find a reference
to them in make xconfig... Are theya patch or buried deep within an
option?
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
Hey, I think I finally got the hang of i-
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
